Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf (GBTC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2026
API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GBTC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GBTC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GBTC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf - - - Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 0% 0% 100% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

GBTC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

GBTC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf -24.60 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

GBTC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

GBTC High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

More than 16,000 other digital assets, as tracked by CoinMarketCap.com, have been developed since the inception of Bitcoin, currently the most developed digital asset because of the length of time it has been in existence, the investment in the infrastructure that supports it, and the network of individuals and entities that are using Bitcoin in transactions. Some industry groups are also creating private, permissioned blockchain versions of digital assets. For example, J.P. Morgan and others are developing an open source platform called Quorum, which is described as a version of Ethereum designed for use by the financial services industry. Similar events may occur with Bitcoin.
Competitor data is not yet available for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf.

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Coinbase Global Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust Etf's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.