Global Indemnity Group Llc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Global Indemnity Group Llc (GBLI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Global Indemnity Group Llc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 456M vs 1,265,291M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+3.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Global Indemnity Group Llc generated 5.1% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 7.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 9.6% net margin compares with 15.1% for the peer group.
- Scale: Global Indemnity Group Llc ranks #57 of 65 companies by market capitalization in the Property & Casualty Insurance industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Global Indemnity Group Llc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.60M compares with $1.28M for the peer group (1.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
GBLI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Global Indemnity Group Llc reported revenue growth of 5.05 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.28 %.
With a net margin of 9.55 %, Global Indemnity Group Llc reported lower profitability than its competitors (15.09 %).
Global Indemnity Group Llc generated 0.04 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.04 % a year earlier.
Global Indemnity Group Llc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Global Indemnity Group Llc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Global Indemnity Group Llc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Property & Casualty Insurance industry grew revenue 5.6% year over year, combined, vs 5.1% for Global Indemnity Group Llc. Global Indemnity Group Llc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.04% to 0.04%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (54) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
GBLI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
GBLI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
GBLI Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Fire Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Universal Insurance Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Safety Insurance Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Siriuspoint Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Heritage Insurance Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Global Indemnity Group Llc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The Company competes with numerous domestic and international insurance and
reinsurance companies, mutual companies, specialty insurance companies, underwriting
agencies, diversified financial services companies, Lloyd’s syndicates,
risk retention groups, insurance buying groups, risk securitization products
and alternative self-insurance mechanisms. In particular, the Company competes
against insurance subsidiaries of the groups in the specialty insurance market
noted below, insurance companies, and others, including:
American International Group;
American Modern Insurance Group
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.;
Berkshire Hathaway;
Everest Re Group, Ltd.;
Foremost Insurance Group
Great American Insurance Group;
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.;
IFG Companies;
Markel Corporation;
Nationwide Insurance;
Navigators Insurance Group;
RLI Corporation;
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.;
The Travelers Companies, Inc.;
Validus Group; and
W.R. Berkley Corporation.
In addition to the companies mentioned above, the Company is facing competition from standard line companies who are continuing to write risks that traditionally had been written by excess and surplus lines carriers, Bermuda companies who are establishing relationships with wholesale brokers and purchasing carriers, and other excess and surplus lines competitors.
Competition may take the form of lower prices, broader coverage, greater product
flexibility, higher quality services, reputation and financial strength or higher
ratings by independent rating agencies. In all of the Company’s markets,
it competes by developing insurance products to satisfy well-defined market
needs and by maintaining relationships with brokers and insureds that rely on
the Company’s expertise. For its program and specialty wholesale products,
offerings and underwriting products that are not readily available is the Company’s
principal means of differentiating itself from its competition. Each of the
Company’s products has its own distinct competitive environment. The Company
seeks to compete through innovative products, appropriate pricing, niche underwriting
expertise, and quality service to policyholders, general agencies and brokers.
Publicly Traded Peers of Global Indemnity Group Llc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | 350.40 | 456.21 |
| Progressive Corp | 122,985.78 | 91,055.00 |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | 82,142.44 | 27,968.00 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 77,581.66 | 48,979.00 |
| The Cigna Group | 72,658.18 | 282,382.00 |
| Metlife Inc | 61,584.88 | 79,403.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 928,183.47 | 1,307,381.40 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Global Indemnity Group Llc.
Sources: Global Indemnity Group Llc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Global Indemnity Group Llc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Foremost Insurance Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| RLI Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| American Modern Insurance Group Argo Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Markel Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| W.R. Berkley Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Great American Insurance Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Selective Insurance Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Everest Re Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Navigators Insurance Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| American International Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| HCC Insurance Holdings | Named by the company | 85% |
| Validus Group | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Global Indemnity Group Llc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | Marsh Insurance Group 55.79 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Business Insurance 45.68 % |
| The Cigna Group | Evernorth 85.32 % |
| Metlife Inc | Group Benefits 36.13 % |
| Aon Plc | Risk Capital 70.80 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | 350 | 1,595,126 | 119,951 |
| Progressive Corp | 122,986 | 1,821,100 | 233,900 |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | 82,142 | 294,400 | 42,821 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 77,582 | 1,440,559 | 243,765 |
| The Cigna Group | 72,658 | 4,171,078 | 103,146 |
| Metlife Inc | 61,585 | 1,726,152 | 79,543 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 927,833 | 1,276,668 | 178,264 |
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Aon Plc | Europe, Middle East, and Africa, Other Than United Kingdom and Ireland 16.91 % |
| Brown and Brown Inc | US 86.46 % |
| Ncr Atleos Corporation | United States 47.84 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 65 companies in Global Indemnity Group Llc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Global Indemnity Group Llc ranks #57 of 65 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.02 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,552, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Chubb Limited | 130,320 | 7.02 % |
| 3 | Progressive Corp | 122,285 | 6.59 % |
| 4 | Travelers Companies inc | 77,573 | 4.18 % |
| 5 | Allstate Corp | 58,619 | 3.16 % |
| 6 | American International Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Arch Capital Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | W R Berkley Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Markel Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 57 | Global Indemnity Group Llc | 353 | 0.02 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Global Indemnity Group Llc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | Tiptree Inc | 653 | -8.29 % |
| 53 | American Integrity Insurance Group Inc | 492 | 20.70 % |
| 54 | Greenlight Capital Re Ltd | 488 | 14.18 % |
| 55 | American Coastal Insurance Corporation | 458 | -14.80 % |
| 56 | Amerisafe Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 57 | Global Indemnity Group Llc | 353 | -9.31 % |
| 58 | Ni Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 59 | Kingstone Companies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 60 | Mbia Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 61 | Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 62 | James River Group Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Global Indemnity Group Llc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Property & Casualty Insurance industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (75 companies). See the full Property & Casualty Insurance industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 49.36 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.22 % | 13.82 % (avg) | -2.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 0.95 % (avg) | -0.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Property & Casualty Insurance industry average (75 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Property & Casualty Insurance industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.0x | 13.2x | -2.2x |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.1x | 6.2x | -0.1x |
| P/B | 0.5x | 1.9x | -1.4x |
| Return on Equity | 4.86 % | industry aggregate | -9.83 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 5.86 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -9.17 % | 2.76 % | 21.15 % | -3.46 % | 16.23 % | -20.23 % | -16.46 % | 2.02 % |
| Operating Margin | 16.74 % | 4.63 % | 29.02 % | 14.41 % | 17.99 % | 17.46 % | 26.34 % | 23.77 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.66 % | 1.16 % | 8.46 % | 4.15 % | 6.40 % | 3.85 % | 4.81 % | 4.42 % |
| P/E | - | - | 4.5x | - | 13.4x | 17.5x | 10.4x | 15.7x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Global Indemnity Group Llc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Global Indemnity Group Llc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 3,552 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 0.95 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Global Indemnity Group Llc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Global Indemnity Group Llc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Global Indemnity Group Llc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 9.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | 0.09 | 0.23 | - |
| Progressive Corp | 0.06 | 1.06 | 0.23 |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | 0.68 | 1.13 | 1.33 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.28 |
| The Cigna Group | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Metlife Inc | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.70 |
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | Q2 2026 | +5.1 % | +7.1 % |
| Progressive Corp | Q2 2026 | +7.3 % | +4.3 % |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | +4.9 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Q2 2026 | +0.3 % | +45.3 % |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.7 % | +22.4 % |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +6.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.1 % | +45.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Progressive Corp | Q2 2026 | +1,027.3 % | +35.3 % |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +22.0 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Q2 2026 | -0.9 % | - |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.4 % | - |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +1,959.3 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | 2.00% | 2.24% | 4.86% |
| Progressive Corp | 9.51% | 11.22% | 35.40% |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | 6.90% | 11.32% | 26.71% |
| Travelers Companies inc | 5.78% | 10.84% | 25.58% |
| The Cigna Group | 4.46% | 6.88% | 16.50% |
| Metlife Inc | 0.49% | 0.77% | 12.93% |
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Global Indemnity Group Llc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | 10.16 | 0.77 |
| Progressive Corp | 10.56 | 1.35 |
| Marsh and Mclennan Companies Inc | 20.88 | 2.94 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 9.72 | 1.58 |
| The Cigna Group | 11.41 | 0.26 |
| Metlife Inc | 18.27 | 0.78 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 5.09 | 0.71 |
Sign in to see all peers for Global Indemnity Group Llc.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.