Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Flir Systems Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Flir Systems Inc (FLIR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2021
Competitors Tracked
53
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.35 %
vs 0.35 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
3.63 %
Peers: 2.18 %
Net Margin
8.30 %
Peers: 6.26 %

Key Findings: Flir Systems Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,940M vs 659,422M combined for tracked competitors (0.3% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-20.4%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Flir Systems Inc generated 3.6% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2021, vs 2.2% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 8.3% net margin compares with 6.3% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Flir Systems Inc accounted for 0.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.4% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.45M compares with $0.47M for the peer group (1.0x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

FLIR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2021

Flir Systems Inc reported revenue growth of 3.63 % year on year in Q1 2021, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 2.18 %.

With a net margin of 8.30 %, Flir Systems Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (6.26 %).

Flir Systems Inc generated 0.35 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.35 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FLIR/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FLIR/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FLIR/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Flir Systems Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2021

Revenue growth, year on year

Flir Systems Inc +3.6 %
Competitors combined +2.2 %

Net income growth, year on year

Flir Systems Inc +151.6 %
Competitors combined -36.0 %

Net margin

Flir Systems Inc +8.3 %
Competitors combined +6.3 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Flir Systems Inc -3.7 %
Competitors combined -20.4 %

TTM net margin

Flir Systems Inc +12.2 %
Competitors combined +7.2 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Flir Systems Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Flir Systems Inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (8) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Flir Systems Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Aerospace & Defense industry grew revenue 13.0% year over year, combined, vs 3.6% for Flir Systems Inc. Flir Systems Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.40% to 0.37%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.

Flir Systems Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Flir Systems Inc Yes Yes No No
Competitors combined (51) 79% 80% 39% 22%
High-Confidence Competitors (8) 88% 100% 50% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2021

0.4%market share
  • Flir Systems Inc0.4%
  • Competitors combined99.7%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Flir Systems Inc and its 53 tracked competitors.

See Flir Systems Inc's full market share breakdown »

FLIR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

FLIR Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Flir Systems Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
26.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(12 of 45)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(4 of 8)
14.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Flir Systems Inc - -
Competitors combined (45) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Flir Systems Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

FLIR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

FLIR High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 9) Percent change over the selected range

FLIR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

FLIR Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Sifco Industries Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Frequency Electronics Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Viasat Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Richardson Electronics Ltd 282.9% Outperformed
5 Acme United Corp 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Flir Systems Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Flir Systems Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Many of the markets that TVM addresses are emerging from the early-adopter environments to broader-based demand, which has attracted competitors. While our market share in thermography products is significant, estimated to be approximately 60 percent based on independent industry research, we view the TVM market as highly competitive, with both large and niche providers of thermal camera equipment. We believe the key drivers of success in these markets are: technological proficiency in imaging sensors, product design and functionality, product quality, product cost, ability to deliver in a timely manner, trustworthy customer service, customer training, distribution reach, brand name, and scalability of operations. We are uniquely positioned to operate in this competitive environment given our demonstrated ability to innovate high-quality sensors at low cost due to our operating model, our advanced research and development capabilities, our established and reliable distribution and service network, our diversified manufacturing operations, and our broad product offering. Our competitors vary market by market, but include divisions of Danaher (Fluke), General Dynamics, L-3 Communications, Sofradir, Axis Communications, NEC, Testo, and numerous smaller companies.

The maritime electronics markets are intensely competitive with many established brands and companies. We compete with these companies through innovation, product capabilities and perceived value, relationships with OEMs and distributors, and product availability and service. We believe we compete successfully with our strength in distribution, established brand name, engineering capabilities, and renewed financial flexibility. Our principal competitors include Furuno, Garmin, Navico, Johnson Controls, as well as numerous smaller companies.

The Surveillance segment operates in highly competitive markets. Many of our competitors in the government sector are well established contractors for various governments and have more financial and other resources than we possess. The principal competitive factors in the government markets include technical innovation, agency relationships, product quality and reliability, price, and ability to deliver. We believe we compete successfully in these markets with our best-in-class technologies, our products’ abilities to outperform customer requirements and competitors’ products, our lower priced solutions that result from our commercial operating model, and our service and support functions that exist in the field and near the customer. Our current principal competitors in the Surveillance markets include divisions of BAE Systems, DRS (a Finmeccanica company), Elbit Systems, General Dynamics, L-3 Communications, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Sagem, Sofradir, and Thales.

The markets in which Detection competes are dynamic and highly competitive. Success in these markets depends on our ability to develop new technologies to meet rapidly evolving customer needs, reduce production and development costs, integrate with third-party devices and systems, establish and foster relationships with key government and commercial customers, and recruit highly technical personnel. Detection competes in various markets with companies such as Agilent Technologies, Canberra Industries, Idaho Technologies, NUCSAFE, Safran, SAIC, Smiths Detection, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and United Technologies.

The diverse portfolio of solutions Integrated Systems is able to provide places the business in competition with a wide variety of companies in the homeland security, defense, and industrial sectors. Integrated Systems competes with diversified defense integrators, commercial security system integrators, and divisions of large technology companies, such as: Boeing, Cobham, Honeywell, L-3 Communications, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Raytheon, SAIC, Cassidian, Telephonics, and Thales.

Publicly Traded Peers of Flir Systems Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Flir Systems Inc 7,603.05 1,940.08 235.97 4,265
General Electric Company 326,967.63 50,638.00 8,982.00 57,000
Rtx Corporation 253,412.25 93,500.00 8,125.00 180,000
The Boeing Company 147,091.13 93,995.00 2,446.00 182,000
Lockheed Martin Corporation 117,687.68 77,014.00 6,287.00 123,000
Trane Technologies Plc 100,565.55 22,209.90 2,972.50 44,000
SUBTOTAL 1,575,957.35 661,362.18 47,557.28 1,421,341
48 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Flir Systems Inc .

Sources: Flir Systems Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Flir Systems Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Flir Systems Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Garmin Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Senstar Technologies Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
908 Devices inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mirion Technologies Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Agilent Technologies Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Axis Communications Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
United Technologies Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Elbit Systems Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Canberra Industries Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
BAE Systems Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Integrated Systems Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
L-3 Communications Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Idaho Technologies Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Technical Communications Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Kratos Defense and Security Solutions inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Leonardo Drs Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Iteris inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Osi Systems inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Northrop Grumman Corp Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Viasat Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Itt Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Aerovironment Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Honeywell International Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Textron Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Flir Systems Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Flir Systems Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
General Electric Company Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % Defense and Propulsion Technologies, Reportable 25.79 % -
Rtx Corporation Pratt and Whitney 35.98 % Raytheon 33.47 % Collins Aerospace 33.23 %
The Boeing Company Commercial Airplanes 47.85 % Boeing Defense Space Security 30.47 % Global Services 21.76 %
Lockheed Martin Corporation Aeronautics 40.43 % Rotary and Mission Systems 21.70 % Missiles and Fire Control 20.44 %
Johnson Controls International Plc Americas 66.79 % EMEA 21.03 % APAC 12.18 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

33 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

Flir Systems Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Flir Systems Inc 7,603 454,884 55,326
General Electric Company 326,968 888,386 157,579
Rtx Corporation 253,412 519,444 45,139
The Boeing Company 147,091 516,456 13,440
Lockheed Martin Corporation 117,688 626,130 51,114
Trane Technologies Plc 100,566 504,770 67,557
PEERS TOTAL 1,568,354 465,340 33,394
48 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

Flir Systems Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Rtx Corporation UNITED STATES 52.99 % Europe 21.65 % Asia Pacific 14.80 %
Lockheed Martin Corporation United States 70.72 % Europe 13.97 % Asia Pacific 9.88 %
Trane Technologies Plc Americas 80.46 % EMEA 12.87 % Asia Pacific 6.67 %
3m Company Americas 54.09 % Asia Pacific 28.77 % EMEA 17.14 %
Northrop Grumman Corp United States 85.81 % Europe 7.61 % Asia Pacific 4.93 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

21 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

Flir Systems Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (56 companies). See the full Aerospace & Defense industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 48.29 % 30.34 % (avg) +18.0 pp
Operating Margin 17.59 % industry median +10.1 pp
EBITDA Margin 21.67 % 4.86 % (avg) +16.8 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 3.02 % 7.10 % (avg) -4.1 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Flir Systems Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Aerospace & Defense industry average (56 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Aerospace & Defense industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E 31.3x 36.1x -4.8x
EV / EBITDA 19.2x 21.5x -2.3x
P/B 4.0x 5.2x -1.2x
Return on Equity 12.84 % industry aggregate 4.93 %
Return on Invested Capital 7.46 % 2.63 % (avg) 4.83 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Flir Systems Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20132014201520162017201820192020
Revenue Growth 6.48 %2.29 %1.73 %6.75 %8.32 %-1.37 %6.27 %1.94 %
Operating Margin 16.09 %16.94 %19.64 %17.79 %16.11 %17.94 %14.48 %16.49 %
Return on Invested Capital 6.72 %6.99 %8.47 %7.95 %6.95 %7.42 %5.90 %7.13 %
P/E 19.0x22.8x16.9x29.2x61.4x22.4x42.2x27.4x

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Flir Systems Inc's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Flir Systems Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Flir Systems Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)ADTTDYMMMFlir Systems IncRTNBRCOSISNOCCVU

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Flir Systems Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.02 % vs industry average 7.10 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Flir Systems Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Flir Systems Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Flir Systems Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective Flir Systems Inc
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Flir Systems Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Flir Systems Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 10.1 points above the industry median.

Weaknesses

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Opportunities

  • Industry revenue growing at a healthy 15.0% median pace.
  • Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (31.3x vs 36.1x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-20.4% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Flir Systems Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Flir Systems Inc 0.16 2.54 0.39 0.60
General Electric Company - 0.86 1.09 0.39
Rtx Corporation 0.12 1.03 0.70 0.55
The Boeing Company 0.08 1.17 22.01 0.58
Lockheed Martin Corporation 0.14 1.14 2.92 1.27
Trane Technologies Plc 0.06 1.15 0.54 0.99
48 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Flir Systems Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Flir Systems Inc Q1 2021+3.6 %-10.9 %+151.6 %-48.4 %
General Electric CompanyQ2 2026+21.1 %+7.7 %+16.6 %+22.8 %
Rtx CorporationQ2 2026+14.5 %+11.9 %+30.4 %+4.3 %
The Boeing CompanyQ2 2026+8.0 %+10.5 %--
Lockheed Martin CorporationQ2 2026+10.5 %+11.3 %+436.8 %+23.4 %
Trane Technologies PlcQ2 2026+10.6 %+27.9 %+6.4 %+58.7 %
PEERS TOTAL+9.6 %+8.4 %-40.8 %-42.7 %
48 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Flir Systems Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Flir Systems Inc Q1 2021+11.5 %-7.1 %+11.5 %-29.1 %
General Electric CompanyQ2 2026+540.9 %+438.0 %+2.4 %+1.2 %
Rtx CorporationQ2 2026+50.7 %+50.6 %+11.5 %+12.9 %
The Boeing CompanyQ2 2026+9.0 %+12.6 %+71.7 %-42.5 %
Lockheed Martin CorporationQ2 2026+1.1 %+10.5 %-9.4 %-37.8 %
Trane Technologies PlcQ2 2026+14.2 %+26.3 %-15.0 %-4.1 %
48 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

Flir Systems Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Flir Systems Inc 7.34%8.55%12.84%5.702.18
General Electric Company6.98%11.25%48.50%4.292.34
Rtx Corporation4.75%6.63%12.06%6.876.10
The Boeing Company1.51%4.33%105.14%28.411.05
Lockheed Martin Corporation10.40%14.74%86.24%22.9517.05
Trane Technologies Plc13.29%18.86%34.76%5.994.96
48 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Flir Systems Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Flir Systems Inc 32.033.920.34-3.98
General Electric Company36.876.461.15-18.30
Rtx Corporation32.632.710.4971.083.72
The Boeing Company67.651.56-865.2424.05
Lockheed Martin Corporation18.801.531.1047.1113.42
Trane Technologies Plc34.274.533.49184.8311.63
PEERS AVERAGE33.142.38212.506.18
48 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Flir Systems Inc .

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License