Figure Technology Solutions Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Figure Technology Solutions Inc (FIGR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Figure Technology Solutions Inc vs Its Competitors
- Scale: Figure Technology Solutions Inc ranks #17 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry, holding 1.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Figure Technology Solutions Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
FIGR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Figure Technology Solutions Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry grew revenue 293.3% year over year, combined, vs 97.6% for Figure Technology Solutions Inc. Figure Technology Solutions Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.10% to 0.05%, a loss of 0.05 percentage points.
Figure Technology Solutions Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Figure Technology Solutions Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
