Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc (FEPI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- Scale: Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc ranks #165 of 187 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
API endpoints for this dataset
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
FEPI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
FEPI Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Tpg Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Blackstone Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Kkr and co inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc |
37.99 | - |
 Blackstone Inc |
95,587.74 | 16,110.48 |
 Tpg Inc |
17,933.45 | 5,053.82 |
 Kkr and co inc |
- | 21,309.16 |
 Brookfield Asset Management Ltd |
- | 5,737.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 113,559.18 | 48,210.46 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Tpg Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Kkr and co inc | Company report | 85% |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Blackstone Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Kkr and co inc | Insurance 53.02 % |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | Infrastruture 20.37 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | 38 | - | - |
| Blackstone Inc | 95,588 | 3,048,341 | 1,291,521 |
| Tpg Inc | 17,933 | 2,659,907 | 304,445 |
| Kkr and co inc | - | 4,261,831 | 1,102,367 |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | - | 2,868,500 | 1,532,500 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 113,521 | 3,398,693 | 1,126,610 |
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 181 companies in Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc ranks #165 of 181 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 413, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welltower Inc | 180,807 | 12.02 % |
| 2 | Prologis Inc | 121,613 | 8.09 % |
| 3 | Equinix Inc | 100,396 | 6.67 % |
| 4 | American Tower Corporation | 88,026 | 5.85 % |
| 5 | Simon Property Group inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Digital Realty Trust Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Public Storage | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Realty Income Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ventas inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Crown Castle Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 165 | Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | 38 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 160 | Clipper Realty Inc | 53 | -15.32 % |
| 161 | Anfield Energy Inc | 46 | -59.68 % |
| 162 | Franklin Street Properties Corp | 45 | -64.29 % |
| 163 | Sachem Capital Corp | 39 | -23.58 % |
| 164 | Manhattan Bridge Capital Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 165 | Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | 38 | -23.87 % |
| 166 | Site Centers Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 167 | Health In Tech Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 168 | Bimini Capital Management Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 169 | Bluerock Homes Trust inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 170 | Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -4.81 % | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | 45.61 % | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.15 % | -4.08 % | -6.40 % | -7.22 % | -4.66 % | -5.05 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 2.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 413 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 14.4 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-50.1% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | 11.65 | 22.15 | - |
| Blackstone Inc | 1.26 | 4.17 | 0.63 |
| Tpg Inc | - | - | 0.56 |
| Kkr and co inc | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.48 |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | - | - | 0.30 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | Q3 2023 | - | - |
| Blackstone Inc | Q2 2026 | +35.9 % | +44.9 % |
| Tpg Inc | Q3 2026 | -0.2 % | -50.0 % |
| Kkr and co inc | Q2 2026 | +12.5 % | -16.7 % |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | Q2 2026 | +60.8 % | +100.7 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +23.7 % | +26.4 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | Q3 2023 | - | - |
| Blackstone Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -20.4 % |
| Tpg Inc | Q3 2026 | - | +339.6 % |
| Kkr and co inc | Q2 2026 | - | -27.9 % |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | Q2 2026 | - | - |
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | - | - | - |
| Blackstone Inc | 14.18% | 13.64% | 33.51% |
| Tpg Inc | 4.17% | 2.77% | 14.86% |
| Kkr and co inc | 1.35% | 1.82% | 7.17% |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 17.13% | 21.04% | 34.88% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Investment Holdings Group Inc | - | - |
| Blackstone Inc | 28.18 | 5.93 |
| Tpg Inc | 53.45 | 3.55 |
| Kkr and co inc | 33.92 | - |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 44.12 | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 7.11 | 2.36 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.