Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Okeanis Eco Tankers's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-0.43 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
31.40 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Okeanis Eco Tankers vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 392M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Okeanis Eco Tankers ranks #13 of 57 companies by market capitalization in the Marine Transportation industry, holding 2.4% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Okeanis Eco Tankers accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ECO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Okeanis Eco Tankers generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ECO/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ECO/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ECO/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Marine Transportation industry grew revenue 2.3% year over year, combined, vs -0.4% for Okeanis Eco Tankers. Okeanis Eco Tankers's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.90% to 0.88%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.

Okeanis Eco Tankers's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp Yes No No No
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 0% 0% 0% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 90% 50% 50% 33%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Okeanis Eco Tankers and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Okeanis Eco Tankers's full market share breakdown »

ECO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ECO Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Okeanis Eco Tankers's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 3)
90%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(9 of 10)
75%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(6 of 8)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp 170.50 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Okeanis Eco Tankers's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ECO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

ECO High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 4) Percent change over the selected range

ECO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

ECO Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

ECO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

ECO Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Okeanis Eco Tankers's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The tanker vessel shipping industry is highly fragmented and competitive, with competition arising mainly from other vessel owners, including major oil companies and independent tanker shipping companies. Competitive factors include price, location, vessel size, age, condition, and the acceptability of vessels and operators to charterers. Competitors with greater resources may consolidate to operate larger fleets, which can create challenges for companies with higher debt levels or limited access to capital. Competitors mentioned in filings include Credit Suisse, Silicon Valley Bank, and UBS.

Okeanis Eco Tankers's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Credit Suisse Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
ESGL Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Silicon Valley Bank Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Oio Group Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
UBS Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Okeanis Eco Tankers's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.