Kibush Capital's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Kibush Capital (DLCR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Kibush Capital vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 136,806M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+41.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-19.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Kibush Capital generated 25.1% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2021, vs 59.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -433.8% net margin compares with 19.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Kibush Capital accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.00M compares with $0.86M for the peer group (0.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DLCR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2021
Kibush Capital reported revenue growth of 25.08 % year on year in Q3 2021, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 59.56 %.
With a net margin of -433.81 %, Kibush Capital reported lower profitability than its competitors (19.87 %).
Kibush Capital generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Kibush Capital vs. its Competitors, Q3 2021
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Kibush Capital and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Kibush Capital's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 11.9% year over year, combined, vs 25.1% for Kibush Capital. Kibush Capital's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Kibush Capital's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | No | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (38) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DLCR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DLCR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gold Resource Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Augusta Gold Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Southern Copper Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | International Tower Hill Mines Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Kibush Capital's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Kibush Capital's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The logging industry is very competitive in Papua New Guinea. We believe that our policy of working with the landowners and providing direct employment to the local villagers appears to provide us with a competitive advantage of greater acceptance of our activities by government officials, local businesses and local Papua New Guineans.
Publicly Traded Peers of Kibush Capital Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 168,000.53 | 15,787.50 |
| Newmont Corporation | 123,825.35 | 25,767.00 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 103,780.56 | 25,868.00 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 20,439.72 | 1,547.06 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 18,485.19 | 3,171.20 |
| SUBTOTAL | 503,728.79 | 136,807.72 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Kibush Capital Corp .
Sources: Kibush Capital Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Kibush Capital Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Kibush Capital's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Southern Copper Corp | Reportable subsegments 100.00 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Rod and Refining 33.08 % |
| Royal Gold Inc | Stream interest 66.67 % |
| International Paper Company | Packaging Solutions North America 60.73 % |
| Weyerhaeuser Company | Wood Products 72.84 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
Kibush Capital's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | 0 | 2,838 | -14,077 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 168,001 | 950,081 | 341,752 |
| Newmont Corporation | 123,825 | 1,472,400 | 501,086 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 103,781 | 892,000 | 158,276 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 20,440 | 39,668,103 | 19,097,205 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 18,485 | 1,210,381 | 324,583 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 503,729 | 860,198 | 135,048 |
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
Kibush Capital's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Southern Copper Corp | Other European Countries 6.87 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Mexico 44.60 % |
| International Paper Company | EMEA 38.90 % |
| Verde Resources Inc | US 96.41 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Kibush Capital's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Construction Raw Materials industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (45 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.94 % | 29.19 % (avg) | +24.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -423.60 % | industry median | -432.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -463.39 % | 8.38 % (avg) | -471.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 12.01 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Kibush Capital's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Construction Raw Materials industry average (45 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 26.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 14.0x | - |
| P/B | -0.5x | 2.6x | -3.1x |
| Return on Equity | 21.03 % | industry aggregate | 9.73 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 8.75 % | 0.69 % (avg) | 8.06 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Kibush Capital's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -19.20 % | 12.97 % | 65.84 % | -17.04 % |
| Operating Margin | -784.68 % | -426.17 % | -298.27 % | -282.62 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 10.43 % | 6.54 % | 7.05 % | 6.27 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Kibush Capital's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Kibush Capital's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Kibush Capital is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Kibush Capital's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Kibush Capital falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Kibush Capital's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 9.7 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+41.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 432.7 points below the industry median.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (48.60 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-19.6% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Kibush Capital's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | 0.01 | 0.03 | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | 2.36 | 4.46 | 0.61 |
| Newmont Corporation | 1.44 | 2.33 | 0.15 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 0.70 | 2.29 | 0.31 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 1.77 | 3.12 | 0.10 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 1.65 | 3.07 | 0.00 |
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Kibush Capital's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | Q2 2021 | +25.1 % | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | Q2 2026 | +40.6 % | +71.5 % |
| Newmont Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.1 % | +8.5 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Q2 2026 | -7.3 % | +80.2 % |
| Royal Gold Inc | Q2 2026 | +114.9 % | +79.3 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Q2 2026 | +125.9 % | +72.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +65.0 % | +25.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Kibush Capital's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | Q2 2021 | -95.7 % | +2,700.2 % |
| Southern Copper Corp | Q2 2026 | +14.7 % | +79.4 % |
| Newmont Corporation | Q2 2026 | +4.3 % | +6.7 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.2 % | - |
| Royal Gold Inc | Q2 2026 | +148.5 % | -55.6 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Q2 2026 | +408.9 % | +106.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
Kibush Capital's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | - | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | 25.88% | 28.19% | 49.18% |
| Newmont Corporation | 15.44% | 17.36% | 25.42% |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 7.86% | 7.15% | 14.70% |
| Royal Gold Inc | 9.04% | 8.45% | 11.58% |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 8.57% | 10.48% | 12.49% |
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Kibush Capital's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Kibush Capital Corp | - | 0.35 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 30.06 | 10.64 |
| Newmont Corporation | 14.69 | 4.81 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 35.25 | 4.01 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 25.70 | 13.21 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 14.53 | 5.83 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 23.45 | 3.68 |
Sign in to see all peers for Kibush Capital Corp .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.