Dine Brands Global Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dine Brands Global Inc (DIN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Dine Brands Global Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 900M vs 158,439M combined for tracked competitors (0.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Dine Brands Global Inc generated 4.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 4.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 1.7% net margin compares with 17.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Dine Brands Global Inc ranks #32 of 56 companies by market capitalization in the Restaurants industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Dine Brands Global Inc accounted for 0.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.51M compares with $0.10M for the peer group (5.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DIN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Dine Brands Global Inc reported revenue growth of 4.38 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 4.69 %.
With a net margin of 1.74 %, Dine Brands Global Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.45 %).
Dine Brands Global Inc generated 0.59 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.59 % a year earlier.
Dine Brands Global Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Dine Brands Global Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Dine Brands Global Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Restaurants industry grew revenue 8.1% year over year, combined, vs 4.4% for Dine Brands Global Inc. Dine Brands Global Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.35% to 0.33%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (39) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DIN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DIN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
DIN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Noodles and Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Bj s Restaurants Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Brinker International Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Flanigan s Enterprises Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Dine Brands Global Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Dine Brands Global inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | 353.14 | 899.84 |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | 166,212.51 | 27,702.00 |
| Starbucks Corporation | 108,575.22 | 38,338.30 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 40,149.82 | 12,423.76 |
| Yum Brands Inc | 38,273.09 | 8,722.00 |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | 32,715.20 | 9,699.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 469,935.26 | 164,009.93 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Dine Brands Global inc .
Sources: Dine Brands Global inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Dine Brands Global inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Roadhouse | Named by the company | 85% |
| Outback Steakhouse | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wild Wings | Named by the company | 85% |
| Chili's Grill & Bar | Named by the company | 85% |
| Torchy's Tacos | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rusty Taco | Named by the company | 85% |
| Olive Garden | Named by the company | 85% |
| Velvet Taco | Named by the company | 85% |
| Buffalo Wild Wings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cracker Barrel Old Country Store inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Dine Brands Global Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | Franchise 73.22 % |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | International Operated Markets 50.75 % |
| Starbucks Corporation | North America 79.32 % |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | U. S. 97.61 % |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | Tim Hortons 44.04 % |
| Darden Restaurants Inc | Olive Garden 41.64 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
Dine Brands Global Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | 353 | 514,780 | 3,629 |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | 166,213 | 184,680 | 58,580 |
| Starbucks Corporation | 108,575 | 100,625 | 5,202 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 40,150 | 95,347 | 10,893 |
| Yum Brands Inc | 38,273 | 178,000 | 90,102 |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | 32,715 | 181,290 | 31,794 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 469,582 | 100,041 | 13,389 |
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
Dine Brands Global Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Starbucks Corporation | United States 79.18 % |
| Yum Brands Inc | United States 54.40 % |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | United States 48.54 % |
| One Group Hospitality Inc | US 99.64 % |
| Fat Brands Inc | United States 97.42 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 54 companies in Dine Brands Global Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Dine Brands Global Inc ranks #32 of 54 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.06 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,555, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mcdonald s Corporation | 166,213 | 28.67 % |
| 2 | Starbucks Corporation | 108,575 | 18.73 % |
| 3 | Luckin Coffee Inc | 86,265 | 14.88 % |
| 4 | Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 40,150 | 6.93 % |
| 5 | Yum Brands Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Restaurant Brands International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Darden Restaurants Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Aramark | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Yum China Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Texas Roadhouse inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 32 | Dine Brands Global inc | 353 | 0.06 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Dine Brands Global Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | Krispy Kreme Inc | 500 | -15.45 % |
| 28 | Kura Sushi Usa Inc | 489 | -36.12 % |
| 30 | Nathan s Famous Inc | 420 | -2.82 % |
| 31 | El Pollo Loco Holdings Inc | 420 | 41.16 % |
| 32 | Dine Brands Global inc | 353 | 22.49 % |
| 33 | Anvi Global Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 34 | Portillos Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 35 | Jack In The Box Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 36 | Dave and Buster s Entertainment Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 37 | Rci Hospitality Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Dine Brands Global Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Restaurants industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (81 companies). See the full Restaurants industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.48 % | 61.55 % (avg) | -22.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.42 % | 2.98 % (avg) | +4.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 5.51 % | 6.19 % (avg) | -0.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Restaurants industry average (81 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Restaurants industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 58.0x | 33.7x | +24.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.4x | 14.2x | +7.2x |
| P/B | -1.4x | 4.0x | -5.4x |
| Return on Equity | -2.33 % | industry aggregate | -163.05 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 7.07 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -100.00 % | - | -24.27 % | 30.02 % | 1.48 % | -8.61 % | -2.26 % | 8.25 % |
| Operating Margin | - | 2.82 % | -32.02 % | 1.07 % | -0.05 % | 1.25 % | -0.36 % | 6.81 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.00 % | 1.69 % | -14.96 % | 0.73 % | -0.04 % | 0.99 % | -0.26 % | 5.16 % |
| P/E | 1,000,000,000,000.0x | 10.9x | - | 13.6x | 14.4x | 7.5x | 6.8x | 29.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Dine Brands Global Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Dine Brands Global Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Dine Brands Global Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,555 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 5.51 % vs industry average 6.19 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Dine Brands Global Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Dine Brands Global Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Dine Brands Global Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Dine Brands Global Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 163.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | 0.45 | 0.94 | - |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | 0.28 | 1.04 | - |
| Starbucks Corporation | - | 0.79 | - |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 0.31 | 1.09 | - |
| Yum Brands Inc | 0.30 | 0.86 | - |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | - | 1.01 | 2.55 |
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | Q2 2026 | +4.4 % | -68.2 % |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.7 % | +4.8 % |
| Starbucks Corporation | Q2 2026 | -1.4 % | +87.1 % |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.3 % | -7.5 % |
| Yum Brands Inc | Q2 2026 | +12.2 % | +58.8 % |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.6 % | +152.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +4.7 % | +39.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dine Brands Global Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | Q2 2026 | +6.9 % | +73.2 % |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | Q2 2026 | +4.0 % | +13.5 % |
| Starbucks Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | -48.6 % |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +35.3 % |
| Yum Brands Inc | Q2 2026 | +25.0 % | +40.8 % |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +34.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
Dine Brands Global Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | 0.36% | 0.45% | - |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | 14.64% | 16.32% | - |
| Starbucks Corporation | 6.45% | 6.70% | - |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 15.80% | 11.37% | 53.26% |
| Yum Brands Inc | 54.70% | 80.08% | - |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | 6.72% | 6.42% | 32.38% |
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Dine Brands Global Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global inc | 52.12 | 0.39 |
| Mcdonald s Corporation | 19.00 | 6.00 |
| Starbucks Corporation | 54.67 | 2.83 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc | 28.75 | 3.23 |
| Yum Brands Inc | 17.40 | 4.39 |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc | 19.12 | 3.37 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.52 | 2.87 |
Sign in to see all peers for Dine Brands Global inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.