Dragon Jade International Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dragon Jade International Ltd (DGJI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Dragon Jade International Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Dragon Jade International Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DGJI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2019
Dragon Jade International Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Pharmacy Services & Retail Drugstore industry grew revenue 6.7% year over year, combined, vs 659.1% for Dragon Jade International Ltd. Dragon Jade International Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
DGJI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DGJI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Dragon Jade International Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Dragon Jade International Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
