Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd (DDI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 360M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd ranks #139 of 165 companies by market capitalization in the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DDI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 8.2% year over year, combined, vs 5.5% for Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd. Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.26% to 0.26%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DDI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DDI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
DDI Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
DDI Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings | Named by the company | 85% |
| DraftKings | Named by the company | 85% |
| Netmarble | Named by the company | 85% |
| Shanghai Giant Network Technology Co. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aristocrat | Named by the company | 85% |
| Big Fish Games | Named by the company | 85% |
| Glu Mobile | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rovio | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zynga Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Activision Blizzard | Named by the company | 85% |
| Electronic Arts | Named by the company | 85% |
| Playtika | Named by the company | 85% |
| Take-Two Interactive | Named by the company | 85% |
| DoubleU Games | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kabam | Named by the company | 85% |
| SciPlay | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kingsway Financial Services Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bet365 | Named by the company | 85% |
| Flutter Entertainment | Named by the company | 85% |
| Product Madness | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.