Konatel Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Konatel Inc (DALP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Konatel Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8M vs 5,855M combined for its competitors (0.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-5.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Konatel Inc generated -13.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 22.1% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -10.7% net margin compares with 70.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Konatel Inc accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.32M compares with $1.04M for the peer group (0.3x).
- Structure: Konatel Inc operates in the following segments: Hosted Services, Mobile Services, Parent Administration Support, Gain on Sale of Subsidiary.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DALP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Konatel Inc reported revenue contraction of 13.38 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 22.06 %.
With a net margin of -10.66 %, Konatel Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (70.91 %).
Konatel Inc generated 0.12 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.17 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Konatel Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Konatel Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Konatel Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Konatel Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Communications Services industry grew revenue -4.9% year over year, combined, vs -13.4% for Konatel Inc. Konatel Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Konatel Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DALP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DALP Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twilio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Paid Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Konatel Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Konatel Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Konatel Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Konatel Inc |
13.19 | 7.90 |
 Twilio Inc |
32,675.93 | 5,832.22 |
 Paid Inc |
19.82 | 22.35 |
| SUBTOTAL | 32,708.94 | 5,862.47 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Konatel Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Konatel Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Konatel Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Twilio | Company report | 85% |
| CLX Comm | Company report | 85% |
| Plivo | Company report | 85% |
| Telnyx | Company report | 85% |
| T-Mobile | Company report | 85% |
| AT&T | Company report | 85% |
| Genband Kandy | Company report | 85% |
| Sprint | Company report | 85% |
| Tropo | Company report | 85% |
| Vonage/Nexmo | Company report | 85% |
| 2600Hz | Company report | 85% |
| Coredial | Company report | 85% |
| Thinq | Company report | 85% |
| Verizon | Company report | 85% |
| Bandwidth | Company report | 85% |
| Metro PCS | Company report | 85% |
| Telestax | Company report | 85% |
| TruConnect | Company report | 85% |
| Assurance Wireless | Company report | 85% |
| Cricket Wireless | Company report | 85% |
| Signal Wire | Company report | 85% |
| TracFone Wireless | Company report | 85% |
| VoIP Innovations | Company report | 85% |
| QLink Wireless | Company report | 85% |
| Paid Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Konatel Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Konatel Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | Hosted Services 72.28 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Konatel Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | 13 | 316,017 | -41,002 |
| Twilio Inc | 32,676 | 1,043,891 | 227,788 |
| Paid Inc | 20 | 744,996 | 4,298 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 32,696 | 1,042,295 | 226,594 |
Konatel Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Twilio Inc | United States 63.95 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Konatel Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 56 companies in Konatel Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Konatel Inc ranks #0 of 56 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,137, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verizon Communications Inc | 190,573 | 18.26 % |
| 2 | T mobile Us Inc | 175,361 | 16.80 % |
| 3 | At and t Inc | 150,242 | 14.39 % |
| 4 | Veon ltd | 139,161 | 13.33 % |
| 5 | America Movil Sab De Cv | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Tim S a | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Vodafone Group Public Limited Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Echostar Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Telecom Argentina Sa | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Konatel Inc | 13 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Konatel Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2018-02-05.
Konatel Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Communications Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (121 companies). See the full Communications Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.34 % | 34.70 % (avg) | -34.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | -0.13 % | 6.36 % (avg) | -6.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 13.45 % (avg) | -13.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Konatel Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -2.57 % | 2.02 % | 37.14 % | 56.01 % | -8.99 % | -14.93 % | -45.48 % |
| Operating Margin | -15.40 % | -17.93 % | -3.85 % | 4.97 % | -12.76 % | -17.12 % | -29.28 % | -31.69 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -116.29 % | -39.11 % | -11.35 % | 15.07 % | -87.76 % | 127.66 % | -54.18 % | -123.25 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Konatel Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,137 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 13.45 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Konatel Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Konatel Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Konatel Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Konatel Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 18.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-5.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Konatel Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | 0.34 | 0.67 | - |
| Twilio Inc | 0.93 | 4.43 | 0.12 |
| Paid Inc | 0.50 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Konatel Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | Q2 2026 | -13.4 % | - |
| Twilio Inc | Q3 2026 | +20.0 % | +332.7 % |
| Paid Inc | Q2 2026 | +12.8 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +19.9 % | +351.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Konatel Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | Q2 2026 | -14.4 % | - |
| Twilio Inc | Q3 2026 | +19.6 % | +21.7 % |
| Paid Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.0 % | -54.0 % |
Konatel Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | - | - | - |
| Twilio Inc | 12.33% | 13.41% | 15.08% |
| Paid Inc | 1.54% | 2.06% | 2.34% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Konatel Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Konatel Inc | 2.97 | 1.67 |
| Twilio Inc | 25.38 | 5.60 |
| Paid Inc | - | 0.89 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 25.72 | 5.58 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.