Data I's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Data I (DAIO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Data I vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 18M vs 845,923M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+15.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+3.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Data I generated -13.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 21.6% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -31.6% net margin compares with 67.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Data I ranks #53 of 71 companies by market capitalization in the IT Infrastructure industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Data I accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.18M compares with $2.49M for the peer group (0.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DAIO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Data I reported revenue contraction of 13.43 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 21.57 %.
With a net margin of -31.64 %, Data I reported lower profitability than its competitors (67.77 %).
Data I generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Data I vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Data I reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Data I and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Data I | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Data I's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the IT Infrastructure industry grew revenue 26.2% year over year, combined, vs -13.4% for Data I. Data I's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Data I's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data I | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (16) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DAIO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DAIO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
DAIO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
DAIO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blackberry Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Clear Secure Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Tenable Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Pitney Bowes Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Palo Alto Networks Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Data I's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Data I's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Data I
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Data I |
22.49 | 17.78 |
 Microsoft Corporation |
3,950,922.06 | 346,445.00 |
 Alphabet Inc |
3,511,646.24 | 471,097.00 |
 Palo Alto Networks Inc |
239,773.76 | 11,480.00 |
 Crowdstrike Holdings Inc |
226,545.33 | 5,395.06 |
 Cloudflare Inc |
95,227.26 | 2,512.92 |
| SUBTOTAL | 8,095,198.05 | 850,767.30 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Data I versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Data I's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Data I reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Via Optronics Ag | Company report | 85% |
| Line Corp | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Data I's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Data I's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | Agents and Infra 83.22 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Google Services 75.49 % |
| Cloudflare Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Blackberry Limited | Secure Communication 48.14 % |
| Pitney Bowes Inc | SendTech Solutions 66.92 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Data I's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data I | 22 | 183,247 | -91,866 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,950,922 | 1,553,565 | 639,601 |
| Alphabet Inc | 3,511,646 | 10,191,610 | 5,098,953 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 239,774 | 523,699 | 14,005 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 226,545 | 504,306 | 7,166 |
| Cloudflare Inc | 95,227 | 487,378 | -40,007 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 8,095,176 | 2,489,574 | 1,111,261 |
Data I's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | US 53.60 % |
| Alphabet Inc | United States 53.05 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | United States 61.76 % |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | United States 66.86 % |
| Cloudflare Inc | United States 52.13 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Data I's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 66 companies in Data I's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Data I ranks #53 of 66 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,082, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Danaher Corporation | 162,925 | 23.50 % |
| 2 | Amphenol Corporation | 96,161 | 13.87 % |
| 3 | Vertiv Holdings Co | 71,818 | 10.36 % |
| 4 | Ametek Inc | 52,561 | 7.58 % |
| 5 | Roper Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Keysight Technologies inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Teradyne Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Veralto Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hubbell Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Fortive Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 53 | Data I | 22 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Data I's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Data I's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | Nortech Systems Incorporated | 34 | 15.70 % |
| 49 | Xchg Limited | 34 | 234.90 % |
| 50 | Sypris Solutions Inc | 28 | -42.47 % |
| 51 | Microvision Inc | 26 | 8.33 % |
| 52 | Pioneer Power Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 53 | Data I | 22 | -21.02 % |
| 54 | Radnostix Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 55 | Clearsign Technologies Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 56 | Neonode Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 57 | Linkers Industries Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 58 | Quarta rad Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Data I's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Data I's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the IT Infrastructure industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (97 companies). See the full IT Infrastructure industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.59 % | 32.80 % (avg) | +17.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -43.67 % | industry median | -47.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -50.23 % | 5.03 % (avg) | -55.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.48 % | 4.57 % (avg) | -2.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Data I's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the IT Infrastructure industry average (97 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full IT Infrastructure industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 36.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 20.6x | - |
| P/B | 2.3x | 4.4x | -2.1x |
| Return on Equity | -68.76 % | industry aggregate | -82.86 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -29.56 % | 0.27 % (avg) | -29.83 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Data I's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -14.18 % | -26.20 % | -5.75 % | 27.09 % | -6.26 % | 15.89 % | -22.43 % | -1.24 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.95 % | -5.93 % | -15.14 % | -1.06 % | -3.09 % | 1.60 % | -13.96 % | -23.80 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.75 % | -2.77 % | -7.39 % | -0.67 % | -2.00 % | 1.13 % | -8.06 % | -15.89 % |
| P/E | 26.6x | - | - | - | - | 64.4x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Data I's Strategic Group Map
Data I is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Data I's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -21.8% and operating margin of -43.7% compares with an average of -16.6% growth and -25.7% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Data I sits below that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Data I's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Data I falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Data I's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,082 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.48 % vs industry average 4.57 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Data I's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Data I's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Data I falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Data I's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+15.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 47.5 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 82.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Data I's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data I | - | 2.72 | 0.00 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.16 | 1.27 | 0.10 |
| Alphabet Inc | 0.63 | 2.40 | 0.16 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.04 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.21 | 1.67 | 0.16 |
| Cloudflare Inc | 0.48 | 1.94 | 2.19 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Data I's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data I | Q2 2026 | -13.4 % | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q3 2026 | +18.8 % | +32.0 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Q3 2026 | +24.7 % | -24.3 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Q2 2026 | +34.4 % | - |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +25.9 % | - |
| Cloudflare Inc | Q2 2026 | +36.0 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +21.9 % | +0.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Data I's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data I | Q2 2026 | -25.9 % | -24.1 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q3 2026 | +23.6 % | +103.0 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Q3 2026 | +24.3 % | +114.4 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Q2 2026 | +62.9 % | +19.4 % |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +20.6 % | +222.1 % |
| Cloudflare Inc | Q2 2026 | +53.6 % | -8.0 % |
Data I's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data I | - | - | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 20.01% | 23.87% | 34.15% |
| Alphabet Inc | 29.24% | 34.26% | 42.62% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.87% | 0.81% | 1.71% |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.69% | 1.09% | 1.67% |
| Cloudflare Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Data I's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Data I | - | 1.27 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 27.71 | 11.40 |
| Alphabet Inc | 14.82 | 7.45 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 640.49 | 20.89 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,446.00 | 41.99 |
| Cloudflare Inc | - | 37.90 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.32 | 9.52 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.