Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Constant Contact Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Constant Contact Inc (CTCT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of 2015
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
10.02 %
2015
Net Margin
6.96 %
2015

Key Findings: Constant Contact Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 362M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Constant Contact Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CTCT Sales vs. its Competitors, 2015

Constant Contact Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CTCT/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CTCT/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CTCT/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Advertising industry grew revenue 6.1% year over year, combined, vs 10.0% for Constant Contact Inc. Constant Contact Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.31% to 0.32%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.

Constant Contact Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Constant Contact, Inc. - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 67% 33% 33% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, 2015

100%market share
  • Constant Contact Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Constant Contact Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Constant Contact Inc's full market share breakdown »

CTCT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CTCT Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Constant Contact Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 3)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Constant Contact, Inc. - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Constant Contact Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

CTCT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

CTCT High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

Constant Contact Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Ziff Davis Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Godaddy Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Thryv Holdings Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Constant Contact Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.