Csw Industrials Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Csw Industrials Inc (CSW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Csw Industrials Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,170M vs 519,268M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+21.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Csw Industrials Inc generated 33.0% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 29.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 14.2% net margin compares with 11.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Csw Industrials Inc ranks #16 of 83 companies by market capitalization in the Chemical Manufacturing industry, holding 0.9% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Csw Industrials Inc accounted for 0.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.2% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CSW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Csw Industrials Inc reported revenue growth of 33.00 % year on year in Q1 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 29.66 %.
With a net margin of 14.20 %, Csw Industrials Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (11.51 %).
Csw Industrials Inc generated 0.22 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.22 % a year earlier.
Csw Industrials Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Csw Industrials Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Csw Industrials Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Chemical Manufacturing industry grew revenue 2.6% year over year, combined, vs 33.0% for Csw Industrials Inc. Csw Industrials Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.29% to 0.37%, a gain of 0.09 percentage points.
Csw Industrials Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (28) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 28.60 % (2 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CSW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CSW Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CSW Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CSW Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dupont De Nemours Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Ecopetrol S a | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Valaris Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Enviri Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Integral Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Csw Industrials Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Csw Industrials Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Csw Industrials Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | 4,852.71 | 1,169.55 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 678,400.22 | 368,757.00 |
| 3m Company | 88,536.35 | 25,180.00 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 80,380.50 | 24,409.20 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 78,808.33 | 16,469.00 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 34,335.20 | 30,513.17 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,112,138.14 | 619,419.29 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Csw Industrials Inc .
Sources: Csw Industrials Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Csw Industrials Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Csw Industrials Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| J.R. Smith | Named by the company | 85% |
| MM Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Stoebich | Named by the company | 85% |
| BrassCraft | Named by the company | 85% |
| DuraVent | Named by the company | 85% |
| Intermatic | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mainline | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oatey | Named by the company | 85% |
| DiversiTech | Named by the company | 85% |
| IFH | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jay R. Smith | Named by the company | 85% |
| NSI Industries | Named by the company | 85% |
| Supco | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cherne | Named by the company | 85% |
| Emseal | Named by the company | 85% |
| IPS | Named by the company | 85% |
| McKeon | Named by the company | 85% |
| RGF | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dura-Vent/Hart & Cooley | Named by the company | 85% |
| Inpro | Named by the company | 85% |
| Little Giant | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nu-Calgon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Won Door | Named by the company | 85% |
| Des-Case | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hy-Pro | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Csw Industrials Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Csw Industrials Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | 4,853 | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 678,400 | 6,357,879 | 575,414 |
| 3m Company | 88,536 | 416,198 | 49,785 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 80,381 | 379,916 | 41,840 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 78,808 | 383,000 | 74,279 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 34,335 | 1,271,382 | 153,423 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,107,285 | 1,312,629 | 98,223 |
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
Csw Industrials Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | United States 89.48 % |
| 3m Company | Americas 54.09 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Non-US 20.00 % |
| Ppg Industries Inc | North America 35.64 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | United States 44.47 % |
| Rpm International Inc | US 68.55 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
Csw Industrials Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | Contractor Solutions 74.15 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Corporate and Unallocated 0.20 % |
| 3m Company | Safety and Industrial 47.55 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Paint Stores Group 57.30 % |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | Automotive OEM 20.42 % |
| Ppg Industries Inc | Industrial Coatings 39.69 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
Csw Industrials Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 79 companies in Csw Industrials Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Csw Industrials Inc ranks #16 of 79 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.92 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,024, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linde Plc | 217,945 | 41.32 % |
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 62,697 | 11.89 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 52,519 | 9.96 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 23,742 | 4.50 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 16 | Csw Industrials Inc | 4,853 | 0.92 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Csw Industrials Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Csw Industrials Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Axalta Coating Systems Ltd | 6,899 | 15.69 % |
| 12 | Sensient Technologies Corp | 5,447 | 31.72 % |
| 13 | Balchem Corp | 5,405 | 11.82 % |
| 14 | Celanese Corporation | 5,183 | 17.71 % |
| 15 | Perimeter Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Csw Industrials Inc | 4,853 | 22.24 % |
| 17 | Methanex Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Azz Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 19 | Cabot Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Valvoline Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 21 | Ashland Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Csw Industrials Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Csw Industrials Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Chemical Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (96 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 42.38 % | 30.74 % (avg) | +11.6 pp |
| Operating Margin | 16.55 % | industry median | +13.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 13.33 % | 3.22 % (avg) | +10.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.74 % | 7.98 % (avg) | -6.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Csw Industrials Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Chemical Manufacturing industry average (96 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 38.1x | 27.8x | +10.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 31.4x | 16.1x | +15.3x |
| P/B | 4.2x | 3.9x | +0.3x |
| Return on Equity | 11.23 % | industry aggregate | 8.43 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.97 % | 0.90 % (avg) | 6.07 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Csw Industrials Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -5.02 % | 15.69 % | 1.45 % | 52.60 % | 25.41 % | 5.48 % | 10.80 % | 16.90 % |
| Operating Margin | 18.48 % | 17.69 % | 15.01 % | 14.23 % | 17.70 % | 19.92 % | 21.00 % | 17.32 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 11.01 % | 11.05 % | 7.61 % | 6.64 % | 9.40 % | 10.47 % | 9.49 % | 7.27 % |
| P/E | 20.6x | 25.7x | - | - | - | - | 46.1x | 38.2x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Csw Industrials Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Csw Industrials Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Csw Industrials Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Csw Industrials Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Csw Industrials Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Csw Industrials Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Linde Plc alone holds 41% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Csw Industrials Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,024 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.74 % vs industry average 7.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Csw Industrials Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Csw Industrials Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Csw Industrials Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Csw Industrials Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Csw Industrials Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 13.5 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 8.4 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+19.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (34.60 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Linde Plc, holding 41.32 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Csw Industrials Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | 0.44 | 2.94 | 0.42 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.13 | 1.11 | 0.17 |
| 3m Company | - | 1.57 | 3.20 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 0.03 | 0.81 | 2.67 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 0.17 | 1.24 | 2.93 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.95 |
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Csw Industrials Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | Q2 2026 | +33.0 % | +20.9 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q2 2026 | +42.3 % | +97.5 % |
| 3m Company | Q2 2026 | +2.5 % | +29.4 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Q2 2026 | +7.5 % | +11.8 % |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | +7.9 % |
| Ecopetrol S a | Q4 2025 | -10.2 % | -21.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +18.5 % | +40.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Csw Industrials Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +106.7 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | +3.9 % |
| 3m Company | Q2 2026 | +4.7 % | +7.2 % |
| The Sherwin williams Company | Q2 2026 | +8.0 % | -40.3 % |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | Q2 2026 | -10.5 % | -8.9 % |
| Ecopetrol S a | Q4 2025 | -5.1 % | +2.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
Csw Industrials Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | 6.44% | 7.14% | 11.23% |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 7.29% | 7.92% | 12.57% |
| 3m Company | 8.27% | 11.16% | 76.55% |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 10.20% | 16.38% | 62.12% |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 19.64% | 26.49% | 101.72% |
| Ecopetrol S a | 5.12% | 7.30% | 13.53% |
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Csw Industrials Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Csw Industrials Inc | 40.73 | 4.15 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 20.97 | 1.84 |
| 3m Company | 30.10 | 3.52 |
| The Sherwin williams Company | 30.17 | 3.29 |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 36.57 | 4.79 |
| Ecopetrol S a | 127.90 | 1.13 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 23.98 | 1.80 |
Sign in to see all peers for Csw Industrials Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.