Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cardinal Ethanol Llc (CRDE) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Cardinal Ethanol Llc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 350M vs 86,405M combined for tracked competitors (0.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+8.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Cardinal Ethanol Llc generated -29.6% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2024, vs -12.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.4% net margin compares with 1.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Cardinal Ethanol Llc ranks #45 of 83 companies by market capitalization in the Chemical Manufacturing industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Cardinal Ethanol Llc accounted for 0.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $4.38M compares with $1.99M for the peer group (2.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CRDE Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Cardinal Ethanol Llc reported revenue contraction of 29.59 % year on year in Q3 2024, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -12.44 %.
With a net margin of 6.44 %, Cardinal Ethanol Llc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (1.89 %).
Cardinal Ethanol Llc generated 0.36 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.44 % a year earlier.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Cardinal Ethanol Llc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Cardinal Ethanol Llc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Chemical Manufacturing industry grew revenue 2.6% year over year, combined, vs -29.6% for Cardinal Ethanol Llc. Cardinal Ethanol Llc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.13% to 0.09%, a loss of 0.04 percentage points.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 85.70 % (6 of 7) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CRDE Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CRDE Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CRDE Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CRDE Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alto Ingredients Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Green Plains Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Rex American Resources Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Archer daniels midland Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Futurefuel Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cardinal Ethanol Llc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Since ethanol is a commodity product, competition in the industry is predominantly based on price. We have also experienced increased competition from oil companies who have purchased ethanol production facilities. These oil companies are required to blend a certain amount of ethanol each year. Therefore, the oil companies may be able to operate their ethanol production facilities at times when it is unprofitable for us to operate. Larger ethanol producers may be able to realize economies of scale that we are unable to realize. This could put us at a competitive disadvantage to other ethanol producers. The ethanol industry is continuing to consolidate where a few larger ethanol producers are increasing their production capacities and are controlling a larger portion of the United States ethanol production. Further, some ethanol producers own multiple ethanol plants which may allow them to compete more effectively by providing them flexibility to run certain production facilities while they have other facilities shut down. This added flexibility may allow these ethanol producers to compete more effectively, especially during periods when operation margins are unfavorable in the ethanol industry.
The largest ethanol producers include Archer Daniels Midland, Flint Hill Resources LP, Green Plains Renewable Energy, POET Biorefining and Valero Renewable Fuels, each of which are capable of producing significantly more ethanol than we produce.
Ethanol plants in the Midwest produce the majority of distillers grains and primarily compete with other ethanol producers in the production and sales of distillers grains. Ethanol plants are expected to produce approximately 36 million metric tons of distillers grains in the 2015/2016 marketing year.
The primary consumers of distillers grains are dairy and beef cattle. In recent years, an increasing amount of distillers grains have been used in the swine and poultry markets. Numerous feeding trials show advantages in milk production, growth, rumen health, and palatability over other dairy cattle feeds. With the advancement of research into the feeding rations of poultry and swine, we expect these markets to expand and create additional demand for distillers grains; however, no assurance can be given that these markets will in fact expand, or if they do, that we will benefit from it. The market for distillers grains is generally confined to locations where freight costs allow it to be competitively priced against other feed ingredients. Distillers grains compete with three other feed formulations: corn gluten feed, dry brewers grain and mill feeds. The primary value of these products as animal feed is their protein content. Dry brewers grain and distillers grains have about the same protein content, and corn gluten feed and mill feeds have slightly lower protein contents.
Publicly Traded Peers of Cardinal Ethanol Llc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 350.87 | 350.34 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,509.00 | 82,099.00 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 1,409.30 | 658.58 |
| Green Plains Inc | 1,242.91 | 1,829.36 |
| Gevo inc | 315.28 | 177.51 |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | 279.77 | 920.78 |
| SUBTOTAL | 42,862.52 | 87,136.68 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
Sources: Cardinal Ethanol Llc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cardinal Ethanol Llc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Air Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cardinal | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cardinal Ethanol Llc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Ethanol 88.64 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Ag Services and Oilseeds 76.86 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Ethanol Production 88.24 % |
| Gevo inc | Gevo North Dakota Segment 88.55 % |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | Pekin Campus Production 64.99 % |
| Futurefuel Corp | Biofuels 67.17 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 351 | 4,379,203 | 409,072 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,509 | 1,978,480 | 42,872 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 1,409 | 4,989,212 | 1,040,894 |
| Green Plains Inc | 1,243 | 2,849,477 | 193,986 |
| Gevo inc | 315 | 1,175,543 | -1,398,656 |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | 280 | 2,360,972 | 62,182 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 42,512 | 1,989,645 | 44,795 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 79 companies in Cardinal Ethanol Llc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Cardinal Ethanol Llc ranks #45 of 79 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.07 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,056, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linde Plc | 220,809 | 41.79 % |
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 61,877 | 11.71 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 51,936 | 9.83 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 24,029 | 4.55 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 45 | Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 365 | 0.07 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cardinal Ethanol Llc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | Lsb Industries Inc | 708 | 19.85 % |
| 41 | Tronox Holdings Plc | 659 | 1.98 % |
| 42 | Luxfer Holdings Plc | 470 | 23.29 % |
| 43 | Valhi inc | 442 | -1.84 % |
| 44 | Standard Lithium Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 45 | Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 365 | - |
| 46 | Orion S a | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 47 | Cyber App Solutions Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 48 | Asp Isotopes Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 49 | Gevo inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 50 | Braskem Sa | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Cardinal Ethanol Llc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Chemical Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (96 companies). See the full Chemical Manufacturing industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.21 % | 30.74 % (avg) | -18.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | 8.91 % | industry median | +1.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 13.63 % | 3.22 % (avg) | +10.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.92 % | 7.98 % (avg) | -3.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Chemical Manufacturing industry average (96 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Chemical Manufacturing industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 8.9x | 27.8x | -18.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.7x | 16.1x | -10.5x |
| P/B | 1.7x | 3.9x | -2.1x |
| Return on Equity | 19.26 % | industry aggregate | 8.85 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 8.10 % | 0.90 % (avg) | 7.20 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -3.86 % | 1.29 % | 15.40 % | 5.03 % | -0.02 % | 68.12 % | 15.26 % | -17.78 % |
| Operating Margin | 8.63 % | 3.57 % | 1.55 % | -1.10 % | -1.48 % | 13.34 % | 11.51 % | 12.33 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | 1.30 % | -1.27 % | -1.83 % | 24.15 % | 19.92 % | 15.14 % |
| P/E | 10.8x | 26.4x | 41.8x | - | - | - | 3.3x | 5.2x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Cardinal Ethanol Llc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Cardinal Ethanol Llc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Cardinal Ethanol Llc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Linde Plc alone holds 42% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,056 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.92 % vs industry average 7.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Cardinal Ethanol Llc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Cardinal Ethanol Llc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 8.9 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (8.9x vs 27.8x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (40.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Linde Plc, holding 41.79 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 1.58 | 3.20 | 0.26 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 0.47 | 1.36 | 0.36 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 2.53 | 6.65 | - |
| Green Plains Inc | 0.56 | 1.83 | 0.53 |
| Gevo inc | 1.62 | 2.32 | 0.34 |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | 0.50 | 3.23 | 0.38 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Q2 2024 | -29.6 % | -62.3 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +320.3 % |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | +335.7 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Q2 2026 | -19.3 % | - |
| Gevo inc | Q2 2026 | +7.1 % | - |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.3 % | +662.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Q2 2024 | -28.2 % | -93.8 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | -10.8 % |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | -7.4 % | +6.0 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Q2 2026 | -34.8 % | -4.0 % |
| Gevo inc | Q2 2026 | +15.4 % | +138.3 % |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.3 % | +1,888.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 12.75% | 15.18% | 19.26% |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 3.33% | 5.61% | 7.77% |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 17.11% | 16.54% | 19.26% |
| Green Plains Inc | 7.84% | 9.27% | 15.53% |
| Gevo inc | - | - | - |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | 6.20% | 6.67% | 10.07% |
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Cardinal Ethanol Llc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 10.71 | 1.00 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 21.76 | 0.47 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 11.67 | 2.14 |
| Green Plains Inc | 9.31 | 0.68 |
| Gevo inc | - | 1.78 |
| Alto Ingredients Inc | 21.35 | 0.30 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.58 | 0.49 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cardinal Ethanol Llc.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.