Ocean Thermal Energy's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ocean Thermal Energy (CPWR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ocean Thermal Energy vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-50.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Ocean Thermal Energy accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CPWR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Ocean Thermal Energy generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Electric Utilities industry grew revenue 13.3% year over year, combined, vs 133.2% for Ocean Thermal Energy. Ocean Thermal Energy's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
CPWR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
Ocean Thermal Energy's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Ocean Thermal Energy's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| DCNS | Named by the company | 85% |
| Akuo Energy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Naval Energies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bardot Energy | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ocean Thermal Energy's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
