Comsovereign Holding's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Comsovereign Holding (COMS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Comsovereign Holding vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6M vs 445,570M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-83.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-25.4%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Comsovereign Holding generated -93.4% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2023, vs 1.5% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -495.6% net margin compares with 2.1% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Comsovereign Holding accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.03M compares with $0.56M for the peer group (0.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
COMS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2023
Comsovereign Holding reported revenue contraction of 93.41 % year on year in Q1 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 1.53 %.
With a net margin of -495.60 %, Comsovereign Holding reported lower profitability than its competitors (2.10 %).
Comsovereign Holding generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Comsovereign Holding vs. its Competitors, Q1 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Comsovereign Holding reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Comsovereign Holding and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Comsovereign Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Communications Equipment industry grew revenue 5.2% year over year, combined, vs -93.4% for Comsovereign Holding. Comsovereign Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.00%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Comsovereign Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | - | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (27) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
COMS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richardson Electronics Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Science applications International corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Elbit Systems Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Dover Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Comsovereign Holding's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Comsovereign Holding Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Comsovereign Holding Corp |
0.00 | 6.17 |
 Rtx Corporation |
259,295.99 | 95,987.00 |
 The Boeing Company |
137,454.18 | 94,913.00 |
 Lockheed Martin Corporation |
131,279.02 | 79,116.00 |
 General Dynamics Corporation |
96,933.84 | 56,520.00 |
 Northrop Grumman Corp |
74,761.42 | 43,591.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 903,782.08 | 449,661.08 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Comsovereign Holding Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Comsovereign Holding's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Rtx Corporation | Pratt and Whitney 36.98 % |
| The Boeing Company | Commercial Airplanes 44.32 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Aeronautics 39.66 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Marine Systems 34.05 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Aeronautics Systems 32.14 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Comsovereign Holding's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | 0 | 30,850 | -226,525 |
| Rtx Corporation | 259,296 | 533,261 | 48,344 |
| The Boeing Company | 137,454 | 521,500 | 42,137 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 131,279 | 643,220 | 52,951 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 96,934 | 483,077 | 39,803 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 74,761 | 5,812,133 | 602,667 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 903,782 | 557,605 | 48,713 |
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Comsovereign Holding's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | North America 99.79 % |
| Rtx Corporation | UNITED STATES 53.04 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | United States 69.29 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | United States 86.67 % |
| Xilinx Inc | Asia Pacific 39.96 % |
| Elbit Systems Ltd | Israel 32.20 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Comsovereign Holding's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 23 companies in Comsovereign Holding's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Comsovereign Holding ranks #0 of 23 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 4,427, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corning Inc | 92,864 | 60.82 % |
| 2 | Lumentum Holdings Inc | 40,179 | 26.31 % |
| 3 | Esco Technologies inc | 5,986 | 3.92 % |
| 4 | Iridium Communications Inc | 4,777 | 3.13 % |
| 5 | Belden Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Ihs Holding Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Napco Security Technologies inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Powerfleet Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Turtle Beach Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | George Risk Industries Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Comsovereign Holding Corp | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Comsovereign Holding's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-05.
Comsovereign Holding's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Communications Equipment industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (46 companies). See the full Communications Equipment industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.18 % | 29.37 % (avg) | +21.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 0.46 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.03 % | 3.57 % (avg) | -3.5 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Comsovereign Holding's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Communications Equipment industry average (46 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Communications Equipment industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 43.0x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 18.0x | - |
| P/B | 0.0x | 4.1x | -4.1x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -2.12 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Comsovereign Holding's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -9.32 % | 211.01 % | -102.52 % | - | 73.07 % | 100.05 % | 12.26 % | -6.66 % |
| Operating Margin | -1,900.66 % | -600.73 % | 26,761.24 % | -298.63 % | -429.79 % | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -214.33 % | -146.28 % | - | - | -36.00 % | -13.30 % | -53.58 % | -120.91 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Comsovereign Holding's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 4,427 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.03 % vs industry average 3.57 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Comsovereign Holding's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Comsovereign Holding's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-83.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Corning Inc, holding 60.82 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-25.4% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Comsovereign Holding's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | 0.08 | 0.42 | - |
| Rtx Corporation | 0.13 | 1.03 | 0.82 |
| The Boeing Company | 0.08 | 1.16 | 8.36 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 0.17 | 1.17 | 2.53 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 0.20 | 1.42 | 0.29 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 0.23 | 1.16 | 0.85 |
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Comsovereign Holding's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | Q3 2023 | -93.4 % | - |
| Rtx Corporation | Q3 2026 | +11.1 % | +28.8 % |
| The Boeing Company | Q3 2026 | +3.9 % | - |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q3 2026 | +11.3 % | +14.0 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q3 2026 | +12.9 % | +16.1 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q3 2026 | +6.7 % | +2.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.1 % | +230.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Comsovereign Holding's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | Q3 2023 | -94.2 % | - |
| Rtx Corporation | Q3 2026 | +41.0 % | +11.8 % |
| The Boeing Company | Q3 2026 | -14.1 % | +16.6 % |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | Q3 2026 | +11.6 % | +15.2 % |
| General Dynamics Corporation | Q3 2026 | +81.5 % | +126.9 % |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | Q3 2026 | +32.3 % | +1.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
Comsovereign Holding's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | - | - | - |
| Rtx Corporation | 5.03% | 6.62% | 12.70% |
| The Boeing Company | 4.58% | 12.92% | 127.18% |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 10.59% | 14.93% | 78.85% |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 7.87% | 12.53% | 17.60% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 8.83% | 10.92% | 25.70% |
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Comsovereign Holding's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Comsovereign Holding Corp | - | 0.00 |
| Rtx Corporation | 31.07 | 2.70 |
| The Boeing Company | 18.01 | 1.45 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 20.17 | 1.66 |
| General Dynamics Corporation | 20.79 | 1.72 |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 16.60 | 1.72 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 23.03 | 2.01 |
Sign in to see all peers for Comsovereign Holding Corp .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.