Context Therapeutics Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Context Therapeutics Inc (CNTX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Context Therapeutics Inc vs Its Competitors
- Scale: Context Therapeutics Inc ranks #371 of 544 companies by market capitalization in the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
API endpoints for this dataset
Context Therapeutics Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (17) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CNTX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CNTX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CNTX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Rallybio Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Merus N v | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Kezar Life Sciences Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Context Therapeutics Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Context Therapeutics Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Context Therapeutics Inc |
17.80 | - |
 Bristol myers Squibb Company |
128,928.40 | 50,033.00 |
 Merus N v |
6,810.81 | 56.61 |
 Iovance Biotherapeutics inc |
3,683.83 | 378.98 |
 Hutchmed china Limited |
2,685.01 | 548.51 |
 Cypherpunk Technologies Inc |
462.94 | - |
| SUBTOTAL | 143,287.59 | 51,160.69 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Context Therapeutics Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Context Therapeutics Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Context Therapeutics Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| ADAPTIN BIO, INC. | Company report | 85% |
| capivasertib | Company report | 85% |
| Enhertu | Company report | 85% |
| Xencor | Company report | 85% |
| BioNTech | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Context Therapeutics Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | Single reportable segment 100.00 % |
| Hutchmed china Limited | Other Ventures segment 47.94 % |
| Rallybio Corporation | Reporting 100.00 % |
| Celularity Inc | Degenerative Disease 65.20 % |
| Dar Bioscience Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
Context Therapeutics Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | 18 | - | -2,488,364 |
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | 128,928 | 1,539,477 | 284,338 |
| Merus N v | 6,811 | 539,105 | -3,629,857 |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | 3,684 | 388,701 | -226,190 |
| Hutchmed china Limited | 2,685 | 703,221 | 586,836 |
| Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | 463 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 143,270 | 1,456,988 | 246,469 |
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
Context Therapeutics Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | United States 69.43 % |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | US 98.66 % |
| Hutchmed china Limited | CN 74.28 % |
| Integrated Biopharma Inc | US 83.83 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 491 companies in Context Therapeutics Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Context Therapeutics Inc ranks #371 of 491 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 988, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eli Lilly And Company | 1,280,038 | 23.96 % |
| 2 | Johnson and Johnson | 685,131 | 12.82 % |
| 3 | Abbvie Inc | 520,479 | 9.74 % |
| 4 | Merck and Co Inc | 365,659 | 6.84 % |
| 5 | Novartis Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Abbott Laboratories | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Novo Nordisk A | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Pfizer Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Astrazeneca Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 371 | Context Therapeutics Inc | 18 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Context Therapeutics Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-10.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 366 | Adial Pharmaceuticals Inc | 19 | - |
| 367 | Briacell Therapeutics Corp | 18 | -66.80 % |
| 368 | Pasithea Therapeutics Corp | 18 | -21.06 % |
| 369 | Marker Therapeutics inc | 18 | 17.44 % |
| 370 | Edesa Biotech Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 371 | Context Therapeutics Inc | 18 | -82.57 % |
| 372 | Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 373 | Seres Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 374 | Cellectar Biosciences Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 375 | Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 376 | Allarity Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Context Therapeutics Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-10. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry average (446 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 26.5x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 15.4x | - |
| P/B | 3.4x | 4.2x | -0.8x |
| Return on Equity | -66.65 % | industry aggregate | -83.00 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -35.50 % | -9.78 % (avg) | -25.72 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -19.24 % | -60.42 % | -20.72 % | -20.02 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Context Therapeutics Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Context Therapeutics Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 988 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Context Therapeutics Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Context Therapeutics Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Context Therapeutics Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 83.0 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of competitors (62.50 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | 8.44 | 8.84 | - |
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | 0.48 | 1.44 | 2.12 |
| Merus N v | 3.67 | 7.20 | - |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | 1.10 | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| Hutchmed china Limited | 0.23 | 4.96 | 0.10 |
| Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | 2.11 | 21.78 | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | Q3 2026 | +6.9 % | -1.5 % |
| Merus N v | Q3 2025 | +3.2 % | - |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | Q3 2026 | +80.1 % | - |
| Hutchmed china Limited | Q4 2025 | -13.0 % | +1,099.2 % |
| Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.6 % | +35.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Context Therapeutics Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | Q3 2026 | +20.7 % | +7.5 % |
| Merus N v | Q3 2025 | - | +21.0 % |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | Q3 2026 | +24.8 % | -55.4 % |
| Hutchmed china Limited | Q4 2025 | -3.6 % | -44.2 % |
| Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
Context Therapeutics Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | - | - | - |
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | 10.47% | 13.59% | 43.83% |
| Merus N v | - | - | - |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | - | - | - |
| Hutchmed china Limited | 26.11% | 30.87% | 36.98% |
| Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Context Therapeutics Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Context Therapeutics Inc | - | - |
| Bristol myers Squibb Company | 13.92 | 2.58 |
| Merus N v | - | 120.32 |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | - | 9.72 |
| Hutchmed china Limited | 5.89 | 4.90 |
| Cypherpunk Technologies Inc | 10.14 | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 16.63 | 2.80 |
Sign in to see all peers for Context Therapeutics Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.