Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Collective Mining Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q1 2026
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q1 2026
Net Margin
9.01 %
Q1 2026

Key Findings: Collective Mining Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,174M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-38.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Collective Mining Ltd ranks #50 of 74 companies by market capitalization in the Electric Utilities industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Collective Mining Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CNL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026

Collective Mining Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CNL/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CNL/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CNL/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Collective Mining Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Collective Mining Ltd - - - No
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 63% 75% 38% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2026

100%market share
  • Collective Mining Ltd100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Collective Mining Ltd and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Collective Mining Ltd's full market share breakdown »

CNL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CNL Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Collective Mining Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
10%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 10)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Collective Mining Ltd -13.80 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Collective Mining Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

CNL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

CNL Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Collective Mining Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the mineral exploration and mining industry, which is highly competitive. Competition centers on acquiring economically viable mineral properties, technical expertise, labor, and capital. The company competes with other mining firms, some of which possess greater financial resources and technical capabilities.
Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License