Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Cell Source Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cell Source Inc (CLCS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2025
Competitors Tracked
43
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
-
Share of combined sales, Q1 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Peers: 7.09 %
Net Margin
-
Peers: -53.83 %
API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CLCS/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CLCS/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CLCS/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Cell Source Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Cell Source Inc - - - No
Competitors combined (42) 21% 65% 59% 40%
High-Confidence Competitors (17) 63% 69% 50% 25%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

CLCS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CLCS Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Cell Source Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
28.9%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(11 of 38)
69.2%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(9 of 13)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Cell Source Inc 12.20 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (38) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (13) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cell Source Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

CLCS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

CLCS High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 17) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Nuvectis Pharma inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Tango Therapeutics Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Boundless Bio Inc 282.9% Outperformed
5 Fate Therapeutics Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cell Source Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Cell Source Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The competitive landscape in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and related graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and virus management includes multiple categories of competitors. These include the “Baltimore” protocol employing a T-cell replete approach under reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC); companies focusing on reducing GvHD in a T-cell depleted setting with high-intensity conditioning, such as Orca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck (OncoImmune), and Takeda; and companies treating GvHD post-occurrence, including Abbvie, Incyte, and Kadmon (now part of Sanofi). Additionally, cell therapy companies developing antiviral treatments include Atara and Allovir. In chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, competitors comprise allogeneic CAR-T companies such as Allogene, Legend, and Fate, alongside autologous CAR-T developers including Novartis, Gilead (KITE), and BMS/Celgene (JUNO). Haploidentical HSCT is increasingly utilized in the US, often performed under RIC with T-cell replete transplants and post-transplant cyclophosphamide treatment, notably the “Baltimore” RIC approach. Major US cancer centers—Johns Hopkins, Fred Hutchinson, City of Hope, and Dana Farber—also conduct clinical trials and provide treatments on a not-for-profit basis. The company recognizes that many competitors possess greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and marketing. It seeks to maintain competitiveness through patents, partnerships, and strategic personnel and distribution relationships.

Publicly Traded Peers of Cell Source Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Cell Source Inc 19.20 - -4.72 1
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 35,311.44 4,804.18 807.99 2,500
United Therapeutics Corporation 22,237.73 3,154.50 1,310.90 1,400
Bridgebio Pharma Inc 13,041.30 713.07 -702.02 839
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc 5,392.33 1,105.28 133.27 739
Crispr Therapeutics Ag 5,220.45 13.39 -451.14 201
SUBTOTAL 101,254.79 9,959.25 -1,931.41 9,402
38 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Cell Source Inc .

Sources: Cell Source Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cell Source Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Cell Source Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Bellicum Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
City of Hope Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Incyte Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Merck (OncoImmune) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Takeda Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Allovir Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bristol Myers Squibb Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Fred Hutchinson Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Kiadis Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Orca Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Abbvie Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bluebird Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Dana Farber Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Johns Hopkins Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Molmed Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Legend Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Atara Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cellectis Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Gilead (KITE) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Legend Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Precision Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Allogene Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
BMS/Celgene (JUNO) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Fate Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Kadmon Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Novartis Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cell Source Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Cell Source Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Bridgebio Pharma Inc Reportable 100.00 % - -
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment 100.00 % - -
Precigen Inc Reportable 100.00 % - -
Uniqure N v Single Reportable Segment 100.00 % - -
Verastem Inc Research Developing and Commercialization Drugs Segment 100.00 % - -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

3 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

Cell Source Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Cell Source Inc 19 - -4,719,087
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 35,311 1,921,673 323,195
United Therapeutics Corporation 22,238 2,253,214 936,357
Bridgebio Pharma Inc 13,041 849,903 -836,732
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc 5,392 1,495,643 180,337
Crispr Therapeutics Ag 5,220 66,627 -2,244,473
PEERS TOTAL 101,236 1,059,382 -204,945
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

Cell Source Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
United Therapeutics Corporation UNITED STATES 95.23 % Non-US 4.77 % -
23andme Holding Co United States 90.26 % United Kingdom 5.67 % Canada 5.30 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Cell Source Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 498 companies in Cell Source Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Cell Source Inc ranks #0 of 498 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 827, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Eli Lilly And Company 1,062,533 19.39 %
2 Johnson and Johnson 664,610 12.13 %
3 Beone Medicines Ltd 545,679 9.96 %
4 Abbvie Inc 467,633 8.54 %
5 Merck and Co Inc 1,234 5.2%
6 Novartis Ag 1,234 5.2%
7 Abbott Laboratories 1,234 5.2%
8 Novo Nordisk A 1,234 5.2%
9 Pfizer Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1,234 5.2%
0 Cell Source Inc 21 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cell Source Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.

Cell Source Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry average (341 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 25.1x -
EV / EBITDA - 17.3x -
P/B -0.8x 4.5x -5.3x
Return on Equity 25.19 % industry aggregate 9.90 %
Return on Invested Capital 18.49 % -2.95 % (avg) 21.44 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Cell Source Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20172018201920202021202220232024
Revenue Growth --------
Operating Margin --------
Return on Invested Capital 21.92 %18.80 %40.09 %26.22 %20.74 %37.73 %31.18 %21.79 %
P/E --------

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Cell Source Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 827 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Cell Source Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Cell Source Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Cell Source Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Return on equity 9.9 points above the industry aggregate.

Weaknesses

  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.

Opportunities

  • A meaningful share of tracked competitors (39.50 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-31.2% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Cell Source Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Cell Source Inc 0.01 0.03 - -
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.12 2.86 1.18 0.94
United Therapeutics Corporation 2.58 5.86 - 0.43
Bridgebio Pharma Inc 1.25 1.80 - 0.63
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.58 3.49 1.36 1.09
Crispr Therapeutics Ag 2.51 16.26 0.16 0.01
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Cell Source Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Cell Source Inc Q1 2025----
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc Q2 2026+66.9 %+10.6 %--20.1 %
United Therapeutics CorporationQ2 2026-1.9 %+0.2 %+7.6 %+21.1 %
Bridgebio Pharma Inc Q2 2026+120.4 %+25.3 %--
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc Q1 2026+60.9 %+34.2 %--
Crispr Therapeutics AgQ2 2026+1,041.4 %+598.3 %--
PEERS TOTAL+44.1 %+11.9 %--
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Cell Source Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Cell Source Inc Q1 2025----
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc Q2 2026+110.0 %+43.7 %+142.6 %+58.8 %
United Therapeutics CorporationQ2 2026+13.6 %-25.4 %+73.6 %+7.1 %
Bridgebio Pharma Inc Q2 2026+311.9 %+51.4 %-91.3 %+542.0 %
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc Q1 2026-14.5 %---
Crispr Therapeutics AgQ2 2026--+453.8 %+28.6 %
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

Cell Source Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Cell Source Inc -----
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 15.76%22.10%93.61%5.4311.45
United Therapeutics Corporation17.98%19.53%20.18%9.932.39
Bridgebio Pharma Inc ---3.991.16
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc 13.20%17.94%39.71%3.240.15
Crispr Therapeutics Ag-----
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Cell Source Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Cell Source Inc ---15,772.64-
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 45.207.35-59.4926.08
United Therapeutics Corporation17.437.051.70105.843.47
Bridgebio Pharma Inc -18.29---
Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc 39.454.88-114.9713.00
Crispr Therapeutics Ag-389.82-55.422.99
PEERS AVERAGE-10.1779.618.28
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Cell Source Inc .

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.