Seacor Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Seacor Holdings Inc (CKH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Seacor Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 754M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Seacor Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CKH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2020
Seacor Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Marine Transportation industry grew revenue 2.4% year over year, combined, vs 10.8% for Seacor Holdings Inc. Seacor Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.44% to 0.48%, a gain of 0.04 percentage points.
Seacor Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seacor Holdings Inc | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CKH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CKH Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CKH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Seacor Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Each of the markets in which Offshore Marine Services operates is highly competitive. The most important competitive factors are pricing and the availability and specifications of equipment to fit customer requirements. Other important factors include service, reputation, flag preference, local marine operating conditions, the ability to provide and maintain logistical support given the complexity of a project and the cost of moving equipment from one geographical location to another.
Offshore Marine Services has numerous competitors in each of the geographical regions in which it operates, ranging from international companies that operate in many regions to smaller local companies that typically concentrate their activities in one specific region.
Inland River Services’ main competitors are other barge lines. Railroads
and liquid pipelines also compete for traffic that might otherwise move on the
U.S. Inland River Waterways. The Company believes that 69% of the domestic dry-cargo
fleet is controlled by five companies and 56% of the domestic liquid barge industry
fleet is controlled by five companies.
Generally, the Company believes the primary barriers to effective competitive
entry into the U.S. Inland River Waterways markets are the complexity of operations,
the consolidation of the inland river towing industry and the difficulty in
assembling a large enough fleet and an experienced staff to execute voyages
efficiently and reposition barges effectively to optimize their use. Inland
River Services believes the primary barriers to effective competitive entry
into the Magdalena River and Parana-Paraguay Waterways markets is similar to
the U.S. Inland River Waterways markets along with local flag requirements for
equipment and local content requirements for operation. The primary competitive
factors among established operators are price, availability and reliability
of barges and equipment of a suitable type and condition for a specific cargo.
Each of the markets in which Shipping Services operates is highly competitive.
Primary direct competitors for U.S.-flag petroleum transportation are other
operators of U.S.-flag oceangoing tank vessels, operators of articulated tug-barge
units, operators of refined product pipelines and railroads. Primary direct
competitors of foreign-flag gas transportation are other owners and operators
of foreign built VLGCs. Primary direct competitors for harbor towing and bunkering
are operators of U.S.-flagged harbor tugs. The U.S. “Jones Act”
shipping market is a trade that is not available to foreign-based competition.
The most important competitive factors are pricing, vessel age, vessel type
and vessel availability to fit customer requirements. Primary direct competition
for cargo liner transportation are other operators of cargo vessels operating
between ports in Florida, Puerto Rico, the Bahamas and the Western Caribbean.
Seacor Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Helix Energy Solutions Group inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| U.S. Inland River Waterways. The Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kirby Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Seacor Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
