Cincinnati Financial's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cincinnati Financial (CINF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Cincinnati Financial vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 13,954M vs 1,296,686M combined for tracked competitors (1.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+22.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Cincinnati Financial generated 31.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 7.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 29.4% net margin compares with 14.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Cincinnati Financial ranks #10 of 65 companies by market capitalization in the Property & Casualty Insurance industry, holding 1.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Cincinnati Financial accounted for 1.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 1.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $2.45M compares with $1.31M for the peer group (1.9x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CINF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Cincinnati Financial reported revenue growth of 31.59 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.59 %.
With a net margin of 29.36 %, Cincinnati Financial achieved higher profitability than its competitors (14.82 %).
Cincinnati Financial generated 1.27 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 1.04 % a year earlier.
Cincinnati Financial vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Cincinnati Financial reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Cincinnati Financial and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Cincinnati Financial's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Property & Casualty Insurance industry grew revenue 5.4% year over year, combined, vs 31.6% for Cincinnati Financial. Cincinnati Financial's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.25% to 1.56%, a gain of 0.31 percentage points.
Cincinnati Financial's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (63) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CINF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CINF Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CINF Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CINF Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Fire Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Universal Insurance Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Heritage Insurance Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Safety Insurance Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Travelers Companies inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cincinnati Financial's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Cincinnati Financial's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The U.S. property casualty insurance industry is a highly competitive marketplace
with more than 2,000 stock and mutual companies operating independently or in
groups. No single company or group dominates across all product lines and states.
Standard market insurance companies (carriers) can market a broad array of products
nationally or:
choose to sell a limited product line or only one type of insurance (monoline
carrier)
target a certain segment of the market (for example, personal insurance)
focus on one or more states or regions (regional carrier)
Standard market property casualty insurers generally offer insurance products
through one or more distribution channels:
independent agents, who represent multiple carriers
captive agents, who represent one carrier exclusively
direct marketing to consumers
Publicly Traded Peers of Cincinnati Financial Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 27,758.20 | 13,954.00 |
| Progressive Corp | 134,144.00 | 91,055.00 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 85,385.66 | 48,921.00 |
| The Cigna Group | 83,380.32 | 282,382.00 |
| Allstate Corp | 67,132.81 | 70,137.00 |
| Metlife Inc | 66,999.43 | 79,403.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,087,253.39 | 1,370,438.14 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
Sources: Cincinnati Financial Corporation's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cincinnati Financial Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Cincinnati Financial's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Cincinnati Financial reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Prudential Financial Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Alleghany Corp | Company report | 85% |
| State Auto Financial Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Mercury General Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Horace Mann Educators Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Employers Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hartford Financial Services Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Metlife Inc | Company report | 85% |
| United Fire Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Old Republic International Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| James River Group Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Global Indemnity Group Llc | Company report | 85% |
| Progressive Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Loews Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Safety Insurance Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Kemper Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Donegal Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hanover Insurance Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Markel Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Heritage Insurance Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Enstar Group Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Travelers Companies inc | Company report | 85% |
| W R Berkley Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Rli Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Kingstone Companies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hallmark Financial Services inc | Company report | 85% |
| Cno Financial Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| American International Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Globe Life Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Universal Insurance Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Security National Financial Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Arch Capital Group Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Axis Capital Holdings Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Partnerre Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| American National Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
| The Cigna Group | Company report | 85% |
| Assurant Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cincinnati Financial's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Cincinnati Financial reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Cincinnati Financial's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | Consolidated Property and Casualty Insurance 59.62 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Business Insurance 47.23 % |
| The Cigna Group | Evernorth 85.32 % |
| Allstate Corp | Allstate Protection 87.37 % |
| Metlife Inc | Group Benefits 36.13 % |
| Aon Plc | Risk Capital 70.80 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
Cincinnati Financial's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 27,758 | 2,445,925 | 583,173 |
| Progressive Corp | 134,144 | 1,821,100 | 233,900 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 85,386 | 1,438,853 | 244,618 |
| The Cigna Group | 83,380 | 4,171,078 | 102,555 |
| Allstate Corp | 67,133 | 1,308,526 | 248,134 |
| Metlife Inc | 66,999 | 1,726,152 | 79,543 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,059,495 | 1,305,106 | 177,184 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
Cincinnati Financial's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Aon Plc | Europe, Middle East, and Africa, Other Than United Kingdom and Ireland 16.91 % |
| Brown and Brown Inc | US 86.46 % |
| Ncr Atleos Corporation | United States 47.84 % |
| Citizens Inc | All Countries 66.88 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Cincinnati Financial's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 65 companies in Cincinnati Financial's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Cincinnati Financial ranks #10 of 65 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.37 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,516, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Chubb Limited | 143,614 | 7.07 % |
| 3 | Progressive Corp | 134,144 | 6.60 % |
| 4 | Travelers Companies inc | 86,602 | 4.26 % |
| 5 | Allstate Corp | 67,133 | 3.30 % |
| 6 | American International Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Arch Capital Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | W R Berkley Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 27,758 | 1.37 % |
| 11 | Markel Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cincinnati Financial's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-10-22.
Cincinnati Financial's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Allstate Corp | 67,133 | 32.74 % |
| 6 | American International Group Inc | 44,303 | 6.35 % |
| 7 | The Hartford Insurance Group Inc | 38,530 | 10.92 % |
| 8 | Arch Capital Group Ltd | 35,818 | 15.35 % |
| 9 | W R Berkley Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 27,758 | 14.00 % |
| 11 | Markel Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 12 | Loews Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Everest Group Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Renaissancere Holdings Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Assurant Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Cincinnati Financial's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-10-22. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Cincinnati Financial's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Property & Casualty Insurance industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (86 companies). See the full Property & Casualty Insurance industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.86 % | 42.84 % (avg) | -42.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 0.23 % | industry median | -30.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 21.11 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.12 % | 1.02 % (avg) | -0.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Cincinnati Financial's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Property & Casualty Insurance industry average (86 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Property & Casualty Insurance industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 7.8x | 12.9x | -5.2x |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.0x | 5.0x | -1.0x |
| P/B | 1.6x | 2.1x | -0.5x |
| Return on Equity | 0.21 % | industry aggregate | -14.48 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.20 % | 7.54 % (avg) | -7.35 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Cincinnati Financial's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | -4.90 % | 27.79 % | -31.91 % | 52.71 % | 13.22 % | 11.41 % |
| Operating Margin | - | 37.73 % | 26.94 % | 44.17 % | -0.90 % | 29.91 % | 32.16 % | 30.29 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.94 % | 10.81 % | 7.02 % | 12.12 % | -0.15 % | 6.92 % | 7.34 % | 7.33 % |
| P/E | 36.7x | 7.4x | 11.2x | 6.5x | - | 8.2x | 9.7x | 10.5x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Cincinnati Financial's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Cincinnati Financial's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Cincinnati Financial is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Cincinnati Financial's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Cincinnati Financial's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Cincinnati Financial falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.19x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Cincinnati Financial's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 3,516 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.12 % vs industry average 1.02 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Cincinnati Financial's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Cincinnati Financial's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Cincinnati Financial's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Cincinnati Financial falls in the High attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Cincinnati Financial's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+22.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 30.2 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 14.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.19x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Cincinnati Financial's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 0.15 | 1.57 | 0.05 |
| Progressive Corp | 0.06 | 1.06 | 0.23 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.29 |
| The Cigna Group | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Allstate Corp | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| Metlife Inc | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.70 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cincinnati Financial's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | Q2 2026 | +31.6 % | +83.2 % |
| Progressive Corp | Q2 2026 | +7.3 % | +4.3 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Q3 2026 | -0.5 % | +1.5 % |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.7 % | +22.4 % |
| Allstate Corp | Q2 2026 | +11.8 % | +55.8 % |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +6.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.5 % | +51.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cincinnati Financial's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | Q2 2026 | +7.7 % | -50.0 % |
| Progressive Corp | Q2 2026 | +1,027.3 % | +35.3 % |
| Travelers Companies inc | Q3 2026 | +0.4 % | - |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.4 % | - |
| Allstate Corp | Q2 2026 | +6.1 % | - |
| Metlife Inc | Q2 2026 | +1,959.3 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
Cincinnati Financial's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 8.02% | 8.98% | 20.89% |
| Progressive Corp | 9.51% | 11.22% | 35.40% |
| Travelers Companies inc | 5.82% | 7.60% | 26.20% |
| The Cigna Group | 4.44% | 6.84% | 16.41% |
| Allstate Corp | 10.88% | 16.50% | 43.12% |
| Metlife Inc | 0.49% | 0.77% | 12.93% |
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Cincinnati Financial's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 8.41 | 1.99 |
| Progressive Corp | 11.52 | 1.47 |
| Travelers Companies inc | 10.68 | 1.75 |
| The Cigna Group | 13.10 | 0.30 |
| Allstate Corp | 5.19 | 0.96 |
| Metlife Inc | 19.88 | 0.84 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 5.80 | 0.79 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cincinnati Financial Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.