Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Clean Energy Technologies Inc (CETY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Clean Energy Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-60.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Clean Energy Technologies Inc ranks #48 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Clean Energy Technologies Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.25M compares with $1.28M for the peer group (0.2x).
- Structure: Clean Energy Technologies Inc operates in the following segments: Reportable Subsegments.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CETY Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Clean Energy Technologies Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 43.4% year over year, combined, vs 57.4% for Clean Energy Technologies Inc. Clean Energy Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | - | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CETY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CETY Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CETY Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
CETY Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Electric Power Co Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Clean Energy Technologies Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Clean Energy Technologies Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| 11.52 | 3.72 | |
| 70,203.45 | 22,432.60 | |
| SUBTOTAL | 70,214.98 | 22,436.32 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Clean Energy Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Clean Energy Technologies Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| General Electric International | Company report | 85% |
| Sinopec | Company report | 85% |
| Calnetix | Company report | 85% |
| Consolidated Edison Inc | Company report | 85% |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Clean Energy Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | Reportable Subsegments 0.00 % |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | Vertically Integrated Utilities 57.14 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | 12 | 248,200 | -396,930 |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | 70,203 | 1,275,957 | 215,960 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 70,203 | 1,275,957 | 215,960 |
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 44 companies in Clean Energy Technologies Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Clean Energy Technologies Inc ranks #48 of 44 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 521, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enbridge Inc | 103,806 | 10.57 % |
| 2 | Williams companies inc | 81,401 | 8.29 % |
| 3 | Enterprise Products Partners L p | 80,190 | 8.17 % |
| 4 | Kinder Morgan Inc | 68,018 | 6.93 % |
| 5 | Energy Transfer Lp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Tc Energy Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Cheniere Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Targa Resources Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Oneok Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 12 | Venture Global Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 48 | Clean Energy Technologies Inc | 12 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Clean Energy Technologies Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-09.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | Montauk Renewables Inc | 400 | 64.63 % |
| 44 | Summit Midstream Corporation | 393 | 26.63 % |
| 45 | Rgc Resources Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 46 | Stabilis Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 47 | Opal Fuels Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 48 | Clean Energy Technologies Inc | 12 | -35.32 % |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Clean Energy Technologies Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-09. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Natural Gas Utilities industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (100 companies). See the full Natural Gas Utilities industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -23.32 % | 40.83 % (avg) | -64.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -86.06 % | industry median | -101.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | - | 30.84 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.34 % | 21.08 % (avg) | -20.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Natural Gas Utilities industry average (100 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Natural Gas Utilities industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 25.1x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 11.5x | - |
| P/B | 1.6x | 2.5x | -1.0x |
| Return on Equity | -95.12 % | industry aggregate | -124.27 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -22.58 % | 5.83 % (avg) | -28.41 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 39.01 % | 20.95 % | -12.67 % | -7.51 % | 104.79 % | 419.67 % | -82.48 % | 48.29 % |
| Operating Margin | -114.46 % | -90.35 % | -87.88 % | -120.94 % | -37.16 % | -19.19 % | -50.18 % | -71.18 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | - | - | -95.11 % | -21.62 % | -14.34 % | -20.61 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Strategic Group Map
Clean Energy Technologies Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 113.5% and operating margin of -86.1% compares with an average of 53.4% growth and 18.4% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Clean Energy Technologies Inc sits above that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 6.7% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 521 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.34 % vs industry average 21.08 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Clean Energy Technologies Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 101.6 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 124.3 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-60.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | 0.05 | 1.10 | 0.26 |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | 0.04 | 0.55 | 1.51 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +57.4 % | - |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | Q1 2026 | +10.2 % | +12.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.2 % | +12.6 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +101.8 % | - |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | Q1 2026 | +14.3 % | - |
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | 3.37% | 3.75% | 11.90% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Technologies Inc | - | 3.10 |
| American Electric Power Co Inc | 18.93 | 3.13 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.52 | 3.13 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
