Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Clean Energy Technologies Inc (CETY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors
5
Named by the company
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
57.42 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-288.46 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Clean Energy Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-60.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Clean Energy Technologies Inc ranks #48 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Natural Gas Utilities industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Clean Energy Technologies Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.25M compares with $1.28M for the peer group (0.2x).
  • Structure: Clean Energy Technologies Inc operates in the following segments: Reportable Subsegments.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CETY Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Clean Energy Technologies Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CETY/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CETY/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CETY/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.
Explore the Financial Data API

For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 43.4% year over year, combined, vs 57.4% for Clean Energy Technologies Inc. Clean Energy Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Clean Energy Technologies Inc - Yes Yes Yes
Competitors combined (1) 100% 100% 100% 0%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 67% 67% 67% 33%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 80% 80% 40% 20%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Clean Energy Technologies Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Clean Energy Technologies Inc and its 5 competitors.

See Clean Energy Technologies Inc's full market share breakdown »

CETY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CETY Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(0 of 1)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 2)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(2 of 5)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Clean Energy Technologies Inc -35.30 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (1) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Clean Energy Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

CETY Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

CETY High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

CETY Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

CETY Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 5) Percent change over the selected range

CETY Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

CETY Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 American Electric Power Co Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Clean Energy Technologies Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the market for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems generating up to 1 MW. Its Clean Cycleâ„¢ generator, based on technology acquired from General Electric International, offers approximately 15% higher efficiency than competing products and features a magnetic design that eliminates the need for oils and lubricants, thereby reducing downtime and maintenance costs. To date, over 123 Clean Cycleâ„¢ generators have been deployed across various applications. The company plans to increase its installation capacity to 6-8 units per year, with the potential to double annual sales. In the natural gas trading market, the company competes on availability and price, targeting gross profit margins of 20-30%, which are substantially higher than the 1-5% margins typical of competitors. The company secures natural gas at significant discounts through prepayment arrangements, enabling it to offer more competitive prices to downstream customers. Competitors identified in filings include General Electric International.

Publicly Traded Peers of Clean Energy Technologies Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Clean Energy Technologies Inc 11.52 3.72 -5.95 15
American Electric Power Co Inc 70,203.45 22,432.60 3,796.80 17,581
SUBTOTAL 70,214.98 22,436.32 3,790.85 17,596

Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Clean Energy Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from Clean Energy Technologies Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
General Electric International Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sinopec Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Calnetix Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Consolidated Edison Inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
American Electric Power Co Inc Company report 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Clean Energy Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Clean Energy Technologies Inc Reportable Subsegments 0.00 % - -
American Electric Power Co Inc Vertically Integrated Utilities 57.14 % Transmission and Distribution Companies 26.73 % Generation and Marketing 15.81 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Clean Energy Technologies Inc 12 248,200 -396,930
American Electric Power Co Inc 70,203 1,275,957 215,960
PEERS TOTAL 70,203 1,275,957 215,960

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 44 companies in Clean Energy Technologies Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc ranks #48 of 44 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 521, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Enbridge Inc 103,806 10.57 %
2 Williams companies inc 81,401 8.29 %
3 Enterprise Products Partners L p 80,190 8.17 %
4 Kinder Morgan Inc 68,018 6.93 %
5 Energy Transfer Lp 1,234 5.2%
6 Tc Energy Corporation 1,234 5.2%
7 Cheniere Energy Inc 1,234 5.2%
9 Targa Resources Corp 1,234 5.2%
11 Oneok Inc 1,234 5.2%
12 Venture Global Inc 1,234 5.2%
48 Clean Energy Technologies Inc 12 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Clean Energy Technologies Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-09.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
43 Montauk Renewables Inc 400 64.63 % 43.62 % 1.52 1.00
44 Summit Midstream Corporation 393 26.63 % -23.14 % 0.82 0.83
45 Rgc Resources Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
46 Stabilis Solutions Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
47 Opal Fuels Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
48 Clean Energy Technologies Inc 12 -35.32 % 0.53 % 0.44 0.34
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Clean Energy Technologies Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-09. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Natural Gas Utilities industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (100 companies). See the full Natural Gas Utilities industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin -23.32 % 40.83 % (avg) -64.2 pp
Operating Margin -86.06 % industry median -101.6 pp
EBITDA Margin - 30.84 % (avg) -
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.34 % 21.08 % (avg) -20.7 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Natural Gas Utilities industry average (100 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Natural Gas Utilities industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 25.1x -
EV / EBITDA - 11.5x -
P/B 1.6x 2.5x -1.0x
Return on Equity -95.12 % industry aggregate -124.27 %
Return on Invested Capital -22.58 % 5.83 % (avg) -28.41 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.
Metric 20182019202020212022202320242025
Revenue Growth 39.01 %20.95 %-12.67 %-7.51 %104.79 %419.67 %-82.48 %48.29 %
Operating Margin -114.46 %-90.35 %-87.88 %-120.94 %-37.16 %-19.19 %-50.18 %-71.18 %
Return on Invested Capital -----95.11 %-21.62 %-14.34 %-20.61 %
P/E --------

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Strategic Group Map

Clean Energy Technologies Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)VGVLPEEOKEENBSJIOGSCTRIClean Energy Technologies Inc

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 113.5% and operating margin of -86.1% compares with an average of 53.4% growth and 18.4% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Clean Energy Technologies Inc sits above that peer average on growth and below it on margin.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Clean Energy Technologies Inc

Clean Energy Technologies Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 6.7% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 521 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.34 % vs industry average 21.08 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)

Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Clean Energy Technologies Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective Clean Energy Technologies Inc
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Clean Energy Technologies Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

No rule matched.

Weaknesses

  • Operating margin 101.6 points below the industry median.
  • Return on equity 124.3 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-60.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
  • Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Clean Energy Technologies Inc 0.05 1.10 0.26 0.28
American Electric Power Co Inc 0.04 0.55 1.51 0.20

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Clean Energy Technologies Inc Q2 2026+57.4 %-52.5 %--
American Electric Power Co Inc Q1 2026+10.2 %+13.3 %+12.6 %+49.2 %
PEERS TOTAL+10.2 %+13.2 %+12.6 %+48.9 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Clean Energy Technologies Inc Q2 2026+101.8 %-22.5 %--
American Electric Power Co Inc Q1 2026+14.3 %+27.9 %--10.7 %

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Clean Energy Technologies Inc ---2.0510.60
American Electric Power Co Inc 3.37%3.75%11.90%5.5212.37

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Clean Energy Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Clean Energy Technologies Inc -3.10--1.92
American Electric Power Co Inc 18.933.130.891,493.692.13
PEERS AVERAGE18.523.131,647.822.13

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API Connect Your AI