Bxp Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bxp Inc (BXP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Bxp Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,526M vs 123,920M combined for tracked competitors (2.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-9.6%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Bxp Inc generated 3.1% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -3.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 11.4% net margin compares with 15.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Bxp Inc ranks #33 of 189 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, holding 0.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Bxp Inc accounted for 3.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 2.9% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $4.27M compares with $0.26M for the peer group (16.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BXP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Bxp Inc reported revenue growth of 3.14 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -3.71 %.
With a net margin of 11.44 %, Bxp Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (15.52 %).
Bxp Inc generated 3.10 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 2.90 % a year earlier.
Bxp Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Bxp Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Bxp Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry grew revenue -0.8% year over year, combined, vs 3.1% for Bxp Inc. Bxp Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.20% to 1.25%, a gain of 0.05 percentage points.
Bxp Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (52) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BXP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BXP Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
BXP Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paramount Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Welltower Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Marriott International Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Cto Realty Growth Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Host Hotels and Resorts Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Bxp Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Bxp Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Principal factors of competition in our primary business of owning, acquiring
and developing office properties are the quality of properties, leasing terms
(including rent and other charges and allowances for tenant improvements), attractiveness
and convenience of location, the quality and breadth of tenant services provided,
and reputation as an owner and operator of quality office properties in the
relevant market. Additionally, our ability to compete depends upon, among other
factors, trends of the national and local economies, investment alternatives,
financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants,
availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes,
utilities, governmental regulations, legislation and population trends.
In addition, although not part of our core strategy, we are currently developing
one residential property and operate two residential properties and may in the
future decide to acquire or develop additional residential properties. As an
owner and operator of apartments, we will also face competition for prospective
residents from other operators whose properties may be perceived to offer a
better location or better amenities or whose rent may be perceived as a better
value given the quality, location and amenities that the resident seeks. We
will also compete against condominiums and single-family homes that are for
sale or rent. Because we have limited experience with residential properties,
we expect to retain third parties to manage our residential properties.
Publicly Traded Peers of Bxp Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | 9,965.64 | 3,525.68 |
| Welltower Inc | 169,188.36 | 11,766.87 |
| Prologis Inc | 126,819.38 | 8,948.19 |
| Marriott International Inc | 94,841.77 | 26,904.00 |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | 25,439.68 | 13,719.00 |
| Equity Residential | 24,437.67 | 3,030.82 |
| SUBTOTAL | 626,372.82 | 181,944.31 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Bxp Inc .
Sources: Bxp Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Bxp Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Bxp Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Marriott International | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Bxp Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Bxp Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Welltower Inc | Senior Housing - Operating 77.53 % |
| Prologis Inc | Real Estate Operations Segment 93.26 % |
| Marriott International Inc | U.S. and Canada 74.47 % |
| Loews Corp | CNA Financial Corporation 80.72 % |
| Host Hotels and Resorts Inc | Hotel Ownership 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Bxp Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | 9,966 | 4,268,383 | 500,507 |
| Welltower Inc | 169,188 | 16,526,507 | 2,046,201 |
| Prologis Inc | 126,819 | 3,193,499 | 1,417,057 |
| Marriott International Inc | 94,842 | 64,986 | 6,249 |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | 25,440 | 330,578 | 46,410 |
| Equity Residential | 24,438 | 1,894,260 | 562,004 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 616,407 | 257,135 | 32,769 |
Bxp Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Welltower Inc | United States 76.30 % |
| Host Hotels and Resorts Inc | United States 98.66 % |
| Melco Resorts and Entertainment Limited | MO 85.78 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Bxp Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 182 companies in Bxp Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Bxp Inc ranks #33 of 182 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.70 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 417, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welltower Inc | 169,907 | 11.84 % |
| 2 | Prologis Inc | 127,892 | 8.91 % |
| 3 | Equinix Inc | 101,514 | 7.07 % |
| 4 | American Tower Corporation | 78,673 | 5.48 % |
| 5 | Simon Property Group inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Digital Realty Trust Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Realty Income Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Public Storage | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ventas inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Iron Mountain Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 33 | Bxp Inc | 10,033 | 0.70 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Bxp Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Bxp Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | Gaming And Leisure Properties inc | 11,046 | -16.18 % |
| 29 | American Homes 4 Rent | 11,023 | -6.32 % |
| 30 | Eastgroup Properties Inc | 10,903 | 22.43 % |
| 31 | American Healthcare Reit Inc | 10,102 | 25.27 % |
| 32 | Camden Property Trust | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 33 | Bxp Inc | 10,033 | -16.59 % |
| 34 | Federal Realty Investment Trust | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 35 | Caretrust Reit Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 36 | Brixmor Property Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 37 | Cubesmart | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 38 | Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Bxp Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Bxp Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (194 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 60.79 % | 71.22 % (avg) | -10.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 55.87 % | 37.42 % (avg) | +18.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 28.62 % | 23.97 % (avg) | +4.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Bxp Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry average (194 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 34.6x | 33.2x | +1.4x |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.2x | 17.6x | -9.5x |
| P/B | 1.3x | 2.0x | -0.7x |
| Return on Equity | 5.40 % | industry aggregate | -0.55 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 1.99 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Bxp Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 4.42 % | 8.96 % | -6.58 % | 4.45 % | 7.61 % | 5.31 % | 4.10 % | 2.46 % |
| Operating Margin | 34.50 % | 36.55 % | -13.89 % | 29.84 % | 21.14 % | 33.24 % | 31.89 % | 28.07 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.95 % | 3.34 % | -1.25 % | 2.86 % | 2.09 % | 3.26 % | 3.19 % | 3.00 % |
| P/E | 33.0x | 41.8x | 16.9x | 36.8x | 12.9x | 53.1x | 769.5x | 39.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Bxp Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Bxp Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Bxp Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.06x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 1.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Bxp Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 417 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 28.62 % vs industry average 23.97 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Bxp Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Bxp Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Bxp Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Bxp Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Bxp Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.06x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (34.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-9.6% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Bxp Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | 0.75 | 0.89 | 1.45 |
| Welltower Inc | 2.32 | 3.26 | 0.26 |
| Prologis Inc | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| Marriott International Inc | 0.06 | 0.47 | - |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | 0.78 | 0.98 | 12.34 |
| Equity Residential | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.42 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bxp Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | Q2 2026 | +3.1 % | -14.0 % |
| Welltower Inc | Q1 2026 | +38.3 % | +192.4 % |
| Prologis Inc | Q1 2026 | +7.4 % | +63.4 % |
| Marriott International Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | +0.4 % |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | Q2 2026 | -0.7 % | -33.3 % |
| Equity Residential | Q2 2026 | -10.7 % | -40.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.5 % | +85.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bxp Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.2 % | +13.1 % |
| Welltower Inc | Q1 2026 | +40.7 % | -37.0 % |
| Prologis Inc | Q1 2026 | -83.2 % | -36.5 % |
| Marriott International Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -1.9 % |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | Q2 2026 | - | +16.1 % |
| Equity Residential | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | -80.8 % |
Bxp Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | 1.61% | 1.44% | 5.40% |
| Welltower Inc | 2.33% | 2.29% | 3.58% |
| Prologis Inc | 4.04% | 2.58% | 6.90% |
| Marriott International Inc | 9.30% | 16.43% | - |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | 9.12% | 9.36% | 122.17% |
| Equity Residential | 4.35% | 3.91% | 8.16% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Bxp Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Bxp Inc | 33.56 | 2.83 |
| Welltower Inc | 115.33 | 14.38 |
| Prologis Inc | 33.61 | 14.17 |
| Marriott International Inc | 37.23 | 3.53 |
| Las Vegas Sands Corp | 15.15 | 1.85 |
| Equity Residential | 27.68 | 8.06 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 27.06 | 3.44 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.