Blum Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Blum Holdings Inc (BLMH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Blum Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 12M vs 246,261M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+41.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-14.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Blum Holdings Inc generated 25.4% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2025, vs 26.0% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -59.2% net margin compares with 5.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: Blum Holdings Inc ranks #47 of 58 companies by market capitalization in the Specialty Retail industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Blum Holdings Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Structure: Blum Holdings Inc operates in the following segments: Cannabis Cultivation and Distributions.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BLMH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2025
Blum Holdings Inc reported revenue growth of 25.35 % year on year in Q3 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 25.97 %.
With a net margin of -59.21 %, Blum Holdings Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (5.38 %).
Blum Holdings Inc generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.01 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Blum Holdings Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Blum Holdings Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Blum Holdings Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Blum Holdings Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Specialty Retail industry grew revenue 16.4% year over year, combined, vs 25.4% for Blum Holdings Inc. Blum Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Blum Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (6) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BLMH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BLMH Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnite Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Pubmatic Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Digital Turbine Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Meta Platforms Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Trade Desk Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Blum Holdings Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Blum Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Blum Holdings Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Blum Holdings Inc |
1.76 | 12.26 |
 Meta Platforms Inc |
1,604,548.53 | 241,607.00 |
 Trade Desk Inc |
7,270.10 | 2,990.14 |
 Magnite Inc |
4,318.03 | 742.04 |
 Digital Turbine Inc |
943.34 | 631.42 |
 Pubmatic Inc |
876.94 | 290.19 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,617,996.88 | 246,281.93 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Blum Holdings Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Blum Holdings Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Blum Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Blum Holdings Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Aiadvertising Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Pubmatic Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Digital Turbine Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Trade Desk Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Magnite Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Blum Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Blum Holdings Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | Cannabis Cultivation and Distributions 1.62 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Family of Apps 99.31 % |
| Digital Turbine Inc | On Device Solutions 64.70 % |
| Pubmatic Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Blum Holdings Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | 2 | - | - |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1,604,549 | 3,063,552 | 954,149 |
| Trade Desk Inc | 7,270 | 778,074 | 105,878 |
| Magnite Inc | 4,318 | 764,206 | 171,873 |
| Digital Turbine Inc | 943 | 1,551,408 | -12,811 |
| Pubmatic Inc | 877 | 281,735 | -13,087 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,617,995 | 2,893,342 | 890,524 |
Blum Holdings Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc | US & Canada 40.58 % |
| Magnite Inc | United States 74.29 % |
| Digital Turbine Inc | Asia Pacific 38.11 % |
| Pubmatic Inc | United States 51.91 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Blum Holdings Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 54 companies in Blum Holdings Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Blum Holdings Inc ranks #47 of 54 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,663, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jd com Inc | 40,218 | 31.13 % |
| 2 | Ulta Beauty Inc | 28,619 | 22.15 % |
| 3 | Dick s Sporting Goods inc | 13,169 | 10.19 % |
| 4 | Firstcash Holdings Inc | 8,000 | 6.19 % |
| 5 | Signet Jewelers Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Academy Sports And Outdoors Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Bath and Body Works Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Bobs Discount Furniture Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Yunji Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Rh | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 47 | Blum Holdings Inc | 2 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Blum Holdings Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-12.
Blum Holdings Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | Sportsman s Warehouse Holdings Inc | 47 | -48.17 % |
| 43 | Live Ventures Inc | 22 | - |
| 44 | Weshop Holdings Limited | 21 | - |
| 45 | Naas Technology inc | 10 | -53.51 % |
| 46 | Eco Science Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 47 | Blum Holdings Inc | 2 | - |
| 48 | Kindcard Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 49 | Redcloud Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 50 | Blue Line Protection Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 51 | Fortune Valley Treasures Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 52 | Webuy Global Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Blum Holdings Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-12. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Blum Holdings Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Specialty Retail industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (102 companies). See the full Specialty Retail industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.61 % | 32.30 % (avg) | +21.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | -2.48 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.30 % | 3.07 % (avg) | -2.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Blum Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Specialty Retail industry average (102 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Specialty Retail industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 1.2x | 31.2x | -30.1x |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.9x | 9.8x | -9.0x |
| P/B | -0.9x | 3.4x | -4.3x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 120.47 % | 0.55 % (avg) | 119.92 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Blum Holdings Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Blum Holdings Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -1.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Blum Holdings Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,663 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.30 % vs industry average 3.07 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Blum Holdings Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Blum Holdings Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Blum Holdings Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Blum Holdings Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+41.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (1.2x vs 31.2x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-14.9% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Blum Holdings Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | 0.03 | 0.12 | - |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 0.42 | 2.23 | 0.29 |
| Trade Desk Inc | 0.31 | 1.68 | - |
| Magnite Inc | 0.23 | 1.02 | 0.52 |
| Digital Turbine Inc | 0.12 | 1.18 | 1.89 |
| Pubmatic Inc | 0.35 | 1.34 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Blum Holdings Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | Q3 2025 | +25.3 % | - |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Q3 2026 | +26.1 % | +264.0 % |
| Trade Desk Inc | Q2 2026 | +3.0 % | -28.6 % |
| Magnite Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.2 % | +73.9 % |
| Digital Turbine Inc | Q3 2026 | +29.4 % | - |
| Pubmatic Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +25.7 % | +258.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Blum Holdings Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | Q3 2025 | +100.0 % | +1,150.0 % |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Q3 2026 | +45.2 % | +80.3 % |
| Trade Desk Inc | Q2 2026 | +22.1 % | -63.6 % |
| Magnite Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.5 % | +2.6 % |
| Digital Turbine Inc | Q3 2026 | +800.9 % | +14.4 % |
| Pubmatic Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.5 % | +16.1 % |
Blum Holdings Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | 34.61% | 58.30% | - |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 17.81% | 20.54% | 30.27% |
| Trade Desk Inc | 6.90% | 13.97% | 16.09% |
| Magnite Inc | 5.53% | 12.87% | 18.62% |
| Digital Turbine Inc | - | - | - |
| Pubmatic Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Blum Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Blum Holdings Inc | 0.26 | 0.14 |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 21.28 | 6.64 |
| Trade Desk Inc | 18.64 | 2.43 |
| Magnite Inc | 26.67 | 5.82 |
| Digital Turbine Inc | - | 1.49 |
| Pubmatic Inc | - | 3.02 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.34 | 6.57 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.