Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Bgm Group Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bgm Group Ltd (BGM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2024
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-47.29 %
Q4 2024
Net Margin
-6.29 %
Q4 2024

Key Findings: Bgm Group Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 38M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+154.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Bgm Group Ltd ranks #456 of 544 companies by market capitalization in the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Bgm Group Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

BGM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024

Bgm Group Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/BGM/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/BGM/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/BGM/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry grew revenue 7.2% year over year, combined, vs -47.3% for Bgm Group Ltd. Bgm Group Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Bgm Group Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Bgm Group Ltd No Yes Yes Yes
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 33% 0% 0% 60%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2024

100%market share
  • Bgm Group Ltd100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Bgm Group Ltd and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Bgm Group Ltd's full market share breakdown »

BGM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

BGM Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Bgm Group Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
16.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 6)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Bgm Group Ltd -97.50 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Bgm Group Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

BGM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

BGM Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

BGM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

BGM Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Bgm Group Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The competitive landscape in China includes several companies manufacturing products similar to those of the WFOE, the VIE, and its subsidiaries. Jiangxi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is noted as the only company producing compound licorice tablets. Competitors for oxytetracycline tablets include Shanxi Datong Tongxing Antibiotics Co., Ltd., Chifeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Hebei Shengxue Dacheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Producers of oxytetracycline active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) include Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd., Kunming Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Hunan Jianlang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hainan Pharmaceutical Factory Co., Ltd. No. 2 Pharmaceutical Factory, and Anhui Fengyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Gansu QLS differentiates itself by having products approved for human consumption by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA), whereas some competitors’ oxytetracycline products are certified only for veterinary use by the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture. Gansu QLS also reports advantages in production metrics such as fermentation unit, fermentation yield, and bacterial infection rate, which contribute to higher production rates, product quality, and scale. The WFOE, the VIE, and its subsidiaries consider their competitive strengths to include their geographic location in West China, unique product combinations, and lower pricing.

Bgm Group Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Hunan Jianlang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hainan Pharmaceutical Factory Co., Ltd. No. 2 Pharmaceutical Factory Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Shanxi Datong Tongxing Antibiotics Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Anhui Fengyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Jiangxi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hebei Shengxue Dacheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Chifeng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Kunming Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Bgm Group Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Bgm Group Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Bgm Group Ltd Diversified Pharmaceutical and Allied Products 62.22 % Insurance Business 28.92 % Ai Solutions 8.87 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).