Bio En Holdings's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bio En Holdings (BENH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Bio En Holdings's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (14) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BENH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alto Ingredients Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Green Plains Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Rex American Resources Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Archer daniels midland Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Futurefuel Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Bio En Holdings's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Bio En Holdings's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Mechanical Heat and Pressure: The generic family of processing materials, known as the “pump and tank” mechanical means of inducing higher temperatures in fluids via pumping and heat exchangers includes: wet oxidation (Zimproet. Al.) pyrolysis, acid hydrolysis (both concentrated and dilute). All have in common the use of heat to crack, decompose or make digestible complex organic debris – basically similar to cooking foods for the same reasons. The most common practitioner of these arts was the Zimpro process which built over 200 commercial plants between 1960 and 1990. Of these only 5 are still in operation by virtue of cannibalization of parts from other units. Again, the problems revolve around “on line availability,” mechanical complexity, moving parts, operator challenges and low yields. Attempts at strong acid hydrolysis in lieu of wet oxidation had the added complication of acid destruction of containment vessels. Yields in all cases were low due to the time period to manipulate the combination of the cellulose to sugar reaction (the combination of higher temperatures and acidic conditions) and complex mixtures of thick cellulosic semi-solid pastes obligated by the costs of pumping and containment. The longer the reaction, the more sugars were destroyed before extraction.
Enzymatic Conversions: Rather than solve the problems of acid hydrolysis researchers moved to the more academic fields of enzyme enhancements which to date have turned out to require the use of expendable proteins for the saccharides conversion. Enzymes also held the promise of continuous academic study which also had a peculiar advantage in the research fields. Lignin remains problematic and some attempts are at hand to separate cellulose, hemi cellulose and lignin prior to further processing. Most of these are pursuing agricultural raw materials. The same problems of the processing of incoming MSW remain the same, noting that many components of agri-wastes and MSW share many characteristics and processing challenges in common. The real shortfall occurs from the seasonality of agricultural cellulose sources and the costs to collect and transport adequate quantities of agricultural chaff.
Publicly Traded Peers of Bio en Holdings Corp.
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | 158.57 | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,111.30 | 82,099.00 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 3,109.37 | 3,640.30 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 1,422.21 | 658.58 |
| Green Plains Inc | 1,256.00 | 1,829.36 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 350.87 | 350.34 |
| SUBTOTAL | 45,855.54 | 112,643.11 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Bio en Holdings Corp..
Sources: Bio en Holdings Corp.'s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Bio en Holdings Corp. versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Bio En Holdings's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Archer daniels midland Co | Ag Services and Oilseeds 76.86 % |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | Biomass-based Diesel 90.62 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Ethanol Production 88.24 % |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Ethanol 88.64 % |
| Gevo inc | Gevo North Dakota Segment 88.55 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
Bio En Holdings's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | 159 | - | -75,416 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,111 | 1,978,480 | 42,872 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 3,109 | 5,178,229 | 266,108 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 1,422 | 4,989,212 | 1,040,894 |
| Green Plains Inc | 1,256 | 2,849,477 | 193,986 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 351 | 4,379,203 | 409,072 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 45,697 | 2,294,064 | 49,600 |
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
Bio En Holdings's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | United States 86.19 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Bio En Holdings's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 53 companies in Bio En Holdings's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Bio En Holdings ranks #0 of 53 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,021, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mondel z International Inc | 73,997 | 25.25 % |
| 2 | Hershey Co | 32,252 | 11.00 % |
| 3 | Kraft Heinz Co | 26,525 | 9.05 % |
| 4 | Tyson Foods Inc | 17,853 | 6.09 % |
| 5 | General Mills Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | The J M Smucker Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Magnum Ice Cream Co N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hormel Foods Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Smithfield Foods Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Bio en Holdings Corp. | 17 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Bio En Holdings's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-05-22.
Bio En Holdings's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Food Processing industry average (82 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Food Processing industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 25.7x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 12.6x | - |
| P/B | -122.2x | 2.9x | -125.1x |
| Return on Equity | 14.90 % | industry aggregate | 3.76 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 0.94 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Bio En Holdings's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3,140.82 % | -193.71 % | -47.68 % | 2.90 % | 5.06 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Bio En Holdings's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,021 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Bio En Holdings's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Bio En Holdings's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Bio En Holdings's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (35.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Bio En Holdings's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | 0.01 | 0.01 | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 0.47 | 1.36 | 0.36 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 2.10 | 6.32 | 0.32 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 2.53 | 6.65 | - |
| Green Plains Inc | 0.56 | 1.83 | 0.53 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 1.58 | 3.20 | 0.26 |
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bio En Holdings's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | Q2 2022 | - | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +320.3 % |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | Q4 2019 | +73.4 % | -68.2 % |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | +335.7 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Q2 2026 | -19.3 % | - |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Q2 2024 | -29.6 % | -62.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +14.4 % | +437.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bio En Holdings's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | Q2 2022 | - | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | -10.8 % |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | Q4 2019 | +86.3 % | +458.2 % |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | -7.4 % | +6.0 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Q2 2026 | -34.8 % | -4.0 % |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Q2 2024 | -28.2 % | -93.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
Bio En Holdings's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | - | - | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 3.33% | 5.61% | 7.77% |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 7.45% | 8.25% | 11.05% |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 17.11% | 16.54% | 19.26% |
| Green Plains Inc | 7.84% | 9.27% | 15.53% |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 12.75% | 15.18% | 19.26% |
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Bio En Holdings's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Bio en Holdings Corp. | - | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 21.54 | 0.46 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 16.23 | 0.85 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 11.78 | 2.16 |
| Green Plains Inc | 9.41 | 0.69 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 10.71 | 1.00 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.83 | 0.41 |
Sign in to see all peers for Bio en Holdings Corp..
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.