Leet Technology Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Leet Technology Inc (BDIC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Leet Technology Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 8,438M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-97.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-18.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Leet Technology Inc generated -98.0% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2025, vs 7.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -6,456.4% net margin compares with 1.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Leet Technology Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.03M compares with $0.29M for the peer group (0.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BDIC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Leet Technology Inc reported revenue contraction of 98.02 % year on year in Q1 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.37 %.
With a net margin of -6,456.36 %, Leet Technology Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (1.93 %).
Leet Technology Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.01 % a year earlier.
Leet Technology Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Leet Technology Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Leet Technology Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.0% year over year, combined, vs -98.0% for Leet Technology Inc. Leet Technology Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Leet Technology Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BDIC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BDIC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Api Group Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Sobr Safe Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Leet Technology Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Leet Technology Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The business of breathalyzer ignition interlock device industry is competitive, and from time-to-time new companies may appear on the list of approved providers in various states, however, there is a high barrier to entry due to the cost of development fees, manufacturing fees, NHSTA-approved testing, and state field testing. We compete with a number of successful companies in the industry, including, but not limited to, LifeSafer®, Smart Start®, Intoxalock®, Guardian Interlock Systems and Dräger. These larger companies have greater financial resources than we do, have approval in most (if not all) states, and likely have 50,000 of their respective ignition interlock devices on the road each. By comparison we currently have approval in eight states and have approximately 225 units on the road. Although we believe our BDI-747/1 device compares favorably to the interlock devices provided by our competitors, we will need to raise significant capital and gain approval in most states in order capitalize on our BDI-747/1 device. We believe if we do this we will be able to compete better with these larger competitors.
Due to the state approvals necessary to service the judicially-mandated breath analyzer ignition interlock market we believe there is a barrier to entry that will discourage too many other companies from entering the industry. Not only must a new entrant develop and manufacture a breathalyzer device, it must meet the NHTSA requirements, and then get approved by state regulators, all of which can be costly. The complexities and costs of meeting all these steps should keep new entrants into the industry to a minimum.
Publicly Traded Peers of Leet Technology Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | 42.31 | 0.52 |
| Api Group Corporation | 16,693.82 | 8,438.00 |
| Sobr Safe Inc | 0.27 | 0.35 |
| SUBTOTAL | 16,736.39 | 8,438.88 |
Sources: Leet Technology Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Leet Technology Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Leet Technology Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Api Group Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Leet Technology Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Leet Technology Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | 42 | 34,835 | -8,573 |
| Api Group Corporation | 16,694 | 290,966 | 11,586 |
| Sobr Safe Inc | 0 | 19,704 | -581,613 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 16,694 | 290,797 | 11,218 |
Leet Technology Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | MY 100.00 % |
| Api Group Corporation | Other Countries 25.78 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Leet Technology Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | IT 100.00 % |
| Api Group Corporation | Safety Services 71.39 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Leet Technology Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 236 companies in Leet Technology Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Leet Technology Inc ranks #0 of 236 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,661, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,756,759 | 50.30 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 486,305 | 6.51 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 388,902 | 5.21 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 268,701 | 3.60 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Leet Technology Inc | 42 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Leet Technology Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2021-08-20.
Leet Technology Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (343 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -7.83 % | 64.28 % (avg) | -72.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -91.90 % | industry median | -85.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -18.99 % | 2.53 % (avg) | -21.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.79 % (avg) | -4.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Leet Technology Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 482.40 % | -23.74 % | -43.23 % | -86.27 % | -232.47 % | - | 108.86 % | 125.35 % |
| Operating Margin | -123.63 % | -104.69 % | -31.64 % | -1,175.48 % | 5,702.19 % | -1,647.09 % | -470.27 % | -51.42 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 436.78 % | 38.94 % | 4.40 % | 17.06 % | 94.03 % | 19.65 % | 8.31 % | 1.86 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Leet Technology Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Leet Technology Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Leet Technology Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Leet Technology Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,661 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.79 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Leet Technology Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Leet Technology Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Leet Technology Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Leet Technology Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Leet Technology Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 85.8 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 20.3 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-97.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 50.30 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-18.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Leet Technology Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Api Group Corporation | 0.34 | 1.45 | 0.88 |
| Sobr Safe Inc | 0.09 | 2.70 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Leet Technology Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | Q1 2025 | -98.0 % | - |
| Api Group Corporation | Q2 2026 | +13.3 % | +15.6 % |
| Sobr Safe Inc | Q2 2026 | -72.1 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +13.3 % | +14.4 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Leet Technology Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | Q1 2025 | -6.7 % | - |
| Api Group Corporation | Q2 2026 | +12.8 % | +14.8 % |
| Sobr Safe Inc | Q2 2026 | +230.1 % | - |
Leet Technology Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | - | - | - |
| Api Group Corporation | 3.68% | 4.70% | 9.82% |
| Sobr Safe Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Leet Technology Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Leet Technology Inc | - | 80.97 |
| Api Group Corporation | - | 1.98 |
| Sobr Safe Inc | - | 0.75 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 51.43 | 1.98 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.