Golden Minerals Co's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Golden Minerals Co (AUMN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Golden Minerals Co vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 28M vs 74,231M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Scale: Golden Minerals Co ranks #122 of 155 companies by market capitalization in the Metal Mining industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.83M compares with $1.35M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Golden Minerals Co vs. its Competitors, Q2 2025
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Golden Minerals Co and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Golden Minerals Co's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Golden Minerals Co's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | - | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (31) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
AUMN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
AUMN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gold Resource Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Augusta Gold Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Southern Copper Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | International Tower Hill Mines Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Golden Minerals Co's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Golden Minerals Co's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Golden Minerals Co
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | 3.15 | 28.18 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 168,365.34 | 15,787.50 |
| Newmont Corporation | 124,865.68 | 25,767.00 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 102,943.62 | 25,868.00 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 20,560.07 | 1,547.06 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 18,464.50 | 3,171.20 |
| SUBTOTAL | 460,330.97 | 91,946.05 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Golden Minerals Co.
Sources: Golden Minerals Co's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Golden Minerals Co versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Golden Minerals Co's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Newmont Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gold Resource Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hecla Mining Company | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Golden Minerals Co's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Golden Minerals Co's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Southern Copper Corp | Reportable subsegments 100.00 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Rod and Refining 33.08 % |
| Royal Gold Inc | Stream interest 66.67 % |
| Hecla Mining Company | Keno Hill 0.39 % |
| Gold Resource Corp | Oaxaca Mexico Segment 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Golden Minerals Co's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | 3 | 828,765 | -69,618 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 168,365 | 950,081 | 341,752 |
| Newmont Corporation | 124,866 | 1,472,400 | 501,086 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 102,944 | 892,000 | 158,276 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 20,560 | 39,668,103 | 19,097,205 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 18,465 | 1,210,381 | 324,583 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 460,328 | 1,345,855 | 353,621 |
Sign in to see all peers for Golden Minerals Co.
Golden Minerals Co's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Southern Copper Corp | Other European Countries 6.87 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Mexico 44.60 % |
| Verde Resources Inc | US 96.41 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Golden Minerals Co's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 131 companies in Golden Minerals Co's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Golden Minerals Co ranks #122 of 131 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 758, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhp Group Limited | 215,834 | 15.46 % |
| 2 | Southern Copper Corp | 168,365 | 12.06 % |
| 3 | Rio Tinto Plc | 154,810 | 11.09 % |
| 4 | Newmont Corporation | 124,866 | 8.94 % |
| 5 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Franco nevada Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Anglogold Ashanti Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cameco Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 122 | Golden Minerals Co | 3 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Golden Minerals Co's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
Golden Minerals Co's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 117 | Golden Star Resource Corp | 6 | - |
| 118 | Northern Minerals and Exploration Ltd | 5 | - |
| 119 | Foremost Clean Energy Ltd | 5 | -77.81 % |
| 120 | Silver Bull Resources Inc | 4 | - |
| 121 | China Natural Resources Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 122 | Golden Minerals Co | 3 | - |
| 123 | Liberty Star Uranium and Metals Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 124 | Artisan Consumer Goods Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 125 | Code Chain New Continent Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 126 | Stardust Power Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 127 | Mako Mining Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Golden Minerals Co's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-30. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Golden Minerals Co's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Metal Mining industry average (72 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Metal Mining industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 21.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 13.3x | - |
| P/B | -1.0x | 3.5x | -4.6x |
| Return on Equity | 85.61 % | industry aggregate | 71.70 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 125.22 % | 7.81 % (avg) | 117.41 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Golden Minerals Co's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 4.55 % | 7.86 % | - | - | 354.07 % | -9.03 % | -48.46 % | - |
| Operating Margin | -57.73 % | -27.16 % | - | -156.11 % | -5.73 % | -43.57 % | -75.99 % | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -18.84 % | -10.68 % | -36.61 % | -46.37 % | -5.03 % | -40.68 % | -71.10 % | -495.97 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Golden Minerals Co's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Golden Minerals Co's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Golden Minerals Co falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 33.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Golden Minerals Co's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 758 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Golden Minerals Co's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Golden Minerals Co's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Golden Minerals Co's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Golden Minerals Co falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Golden Minerals Co's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 71.7 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 33.6% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (36.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-8.3% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Golden Minerals Co's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | 0.63 | 0.76 | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | 2.36 | 4.46 | 0.61 |
| Newmont Corporation | 1.44 | 2.33 | 0.15 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 0.70 | 2.29 | 0.31 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 1.77 | 3.12 | 0.10 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 1.65 | 3.07 | 0.00 |
Sign in to see all peers for Golden Minerals Co.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Golden Minerals Co's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | Q2 2025 | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | Q2 2026 | +40.6 % | +71.5 % |
| Newmont Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.1 % | +8.5 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Q2 2026 | -7.3 % | +80.2 % |
| Royal Gold Inc | Q2 2026 | +114.9 % | +79.3 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Q2 2026 | +125.9 % | +72.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +119.0 % | +28.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Golden Minerals Co.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Golden Minerals Co's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | Q2 2025 | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | Q2 2026 | +14.7 % | +79.4 % |
| Newmont Corporation | Q2 2026 | +4.3 % | +6.7 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.2 % | - |
| Royal Gold Inc | Q2 2026 | +148.5 % | -55.6 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Q2 2026 | +408.9 % | +106.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Golden Minerals Co.
Golden Minerals Co's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | - | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | 25.88% | 28.19% | 49.18% |
| Newmont Corporation | 15.44% | 17.36% | 25.42% |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 7.86% | 7.15% | 14.70% |
| Royal Gold Inc | 9.04% | 8.45% | 11.58% |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 8.57% | 10.48% | 12.49% |
Sign in to see all peers for Golden Minerals Co.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Golden Minerals Co's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Golden Minerals Co | - | 0.11 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 30.13 | 10.66 |
| Newmont Corporation | 14.81 | 4.85 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 34.97 | 3.98 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 25.85 | 13.29 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 14.51 | 5.82 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 19.06 | 5.01 |
Sign in to see all peers for Golden Minerals Co.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.