Agape Atp's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Agape Atp (ATPC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Agape Atp vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 88,263M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-62.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+5.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Agape Atp generated -76.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 11.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 140.2% net margin compares with 12.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Agape Atp ranks #194 of 247 companies by market capitalization in the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Agape Atp accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.06M compares with $0.36M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ATPC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Agape Atp reported revenue contraction of 76.56 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 11.53 %.
With a net margin of 140.24 %, Agape Atp achieved higher profitability than its competitors (12.45 %).
Agape Atp generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Agape Atp vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Agape Atp and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Agape Atp's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry grew revenue 15.0% year over year, combined, vs -76.6% for Agape Atp. Agape Atp's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Agape Atp's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 57.10 % (4 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ATPC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ATPC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
ATPC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
ATPC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Ecolab Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Trimble Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Agape Atp's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Agape Atp Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | 2.20 | 1.15 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 251,760.60 | 46,336.00 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199.36 | 21,499.00 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,080.91 | 16,995.90 |
| Trimble Inc | 13,399.83 | 3,432.50 |
| SUBTOTAL | 468,442.89 | 88,264.55 |
Sources: Agape Atp Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Agape Atp Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Agape Atp's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Elken Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bio-Life Marketing Sdn Bhd | Named by the company | 85% |
| NHF Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| BMS Organics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Usana Group | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Agape Atp's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Agape Atp's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | Skin Care and Health Segment 12.55 % |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Clinical Research 19.98 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Diversified Industrial 66.93 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Water Services 50.05 % |
| Trimble Inc | Field Systems 49.88 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Agape Atp's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | 2 | 64,027 | -63,670 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 251,761 | 370,688 | 55,912 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 124,199 | 359,215 | 60,969 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,081 | 354,081 | 44,450 |
| Trimble Inc | 13,400 | 298,478 | -9,104 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 468,441 | 361,217 | 51,839 |
Agape Atp's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | North America 51.27 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | North America 67.21 % |
| Trimble Inc | North America 66.43 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Agape Atp's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 222 companies in Agape Atp's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Agape Atp ranks #194 of 222 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 587, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 145,832 | 13.38 % |
| 2 | Medtronic Plc | 113,372 | 10.40 % |
| 3 | Stryker Corp | 105,405 | 9.67 % |
| 4 | 3m Company | 88,542 | 8.12 % |
| 5 | Boston Scientific Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Becton Dickinson And Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Dexcom Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Resmed Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Alcon inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 194 | Agape Atp Corporation | 2 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Agape Atp's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Agape Atp's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 189 | Adm Tronics Unlimited Inc | 3 | - |
| 190 | Intelligent Bio Solutions Inc | 3 | -86.54 % |
| 191 | Escalon Medical Corp | 2 | - |
| 192 | Invo Fertility Inc | 2 | - |
| 193 | Aethlon Medical Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 194 | Agape Atp Corporation | 2 | -96.41 % |
| 195 | Vivos Therapeutics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 196 | Vycor Medical Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 197 | Autonomix Medical Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 198 | Bluejay Diagnostics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 199 | Odyssey Health Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Agape Atp's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Agape Atp's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (288 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 53.35 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -271.38 % | industry median | -263.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -105.65 % | -6.82 % (avg) | -98.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 5.43 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Agape Atp's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry average (288 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 34.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 19.7x | - |
| P/B | 0.1x | 4.7x | -4.6x |
| Return on Equity | -5.13 % | industry aggregate | -17.19 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -6.99 % | -2.32 % (avg) | -4.67 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Agape Atp's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Agape Atp's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Agape Atp is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Agape Atp's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Agape Atp's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Agape Atp falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Agape Atp's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 587 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Agape Atp's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Agape Atp's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Agape Atp's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Agape Atp falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Agape Atp's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 263.0 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 17.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-62.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Agape Atp's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | 0.06 | 10.62 | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 0.32 | 1.62 | 0.78 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 0.08 | 1.16 | 0.65 |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.38 | 1.38 | 1.29 |
| Trimble Inc | 0.17 | 1.02 | 0.25 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Agape Atp's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | Q2 2026 | -76.6 % | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +7.6 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.8 % | +18.2 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.5 % | +1.9 % |
| Trimble Inc | Q2 2026 | +28.2 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.5 % | -8.2 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Agape Atp's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | Q2 2026 | -99.3 % | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | Q2 2026 | +142.5 % | +53.1 % |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.8 % | +32.2 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.1 % | +10.8 % |
| Trimble Inc | Q2 2026 | +85.7 % | +20.3 % |
Agape Atp's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | - | - | - |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 6.36% | 7.71% | 13.37% |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 11.99% | 15.10% | 25.38% |
| Ecolab Inc | 8.24% | 9.11% | 21.51% |
| Trimble Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Agape Atp's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Agape Atp Corporation | - | 1.91 |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 36.52 | 5.43 |
| Parker hannifin Corporation | 34.06 | 5.78 |
| Ecolab Inc | 37.59 | 4.65 |
| Trimble Inc | - | 3.90 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 36.98 | 5.31 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.