Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Aersale's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Aersale (ASLE) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-33.92 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-7.85 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Aersale vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 303M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-6.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Aersale ranks #16 of 20 companies by market capitalization in the Construction & Mining Machinery industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Aersale accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ASLE Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Aersale generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ASLE/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ASLE/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ASLE/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Construction & Mining Machinery industry grew revenue 6.1% year over year, combined, vs -33.9% for Aersale. Aersale's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.20% to 0.12%, a loss of 0.07 percentage points.

Aersale's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Aersale Corporation No No No Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (8) 100% 88% 63% 38%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 38% 29% 29% 63%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 75.00 % (6 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Aersale100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Aersale and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Aersale's full market share breakdown »

ASLE Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ASLE Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Aersale's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
57.1%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(4 of 7)
57.1%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(4 of 7)
71.4%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(5 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Aersale Corporation -36.10 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Aersale's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ASLE Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

ASLE High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

ASLE Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

ASLE Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

ASLE Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

ASLE Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Aersale's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The aviation aftermarket is characterized by intense competition among various participants, including flight equipment OEMs, MRO providers, airlines, aircraft and engine leasing companies, financial sponsors, USM sales organizations, and independent manufacturers and service providers. Competitors often specialize in specific segments such as aircraft MRO, engine MRO, engineered solutions, aircraft leasing, engine leasing, USM part sales, and asset management. Component MRO providers may focus on repairs related to composites, pneumatics, hydraulics, electronics, landing gear, wheels and brakes, and auxiliary power units. Buyers evaluate suppliers based on quality, pricing, availability, reputation, technical specifications, prior history, turnaround time, location, and financial terms. In the Asset Management Solutions segment, competitors include AAR Corp., AerCap, Delta Air Lines, Inc., GA Telesis, LLC, Kellstrom Aerospace, Heico Corporation, Willis Lease Finance Corp, Air Transport Services Group, LLC, Unical Aviation, Inc., Satair Group, Aviall, Inc., and FTAI Aviation. The TechOps segment features competitors such as AAR Corp., Aviation Technical Services, Inc., HAECO Americas, MRO Holdings, Inc., ST Engineering North America, Air Transport Services Group, LLC, Delta TechOps, TransDigm Group, VSE Corporation, Woodward, Inc., Lufthansa Technik AG, and Triumph Group. Large pure-play aircraft and engine leasing companies are generally not considered core competitors due to their focus on financial products and limited technical capabilities for mid-life assets. Some competitors possess greater marketing, financial, technical, and infrastructure resources, enabling them to offer broader product and service ranges at more competitive pricing. The company focuses on services and products where it has synergistic capabilities that provide a competitive advantage.

Aersale's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
MRO Holdings, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Unical Aviation, Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
AAR Corp. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Delta Air Lines, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Kellstrom Aerospace Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
ST Engineering North America Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Aviall, Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
HAECO Americas Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
MTU Aero Engines Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Willis Lease Finance Corp Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
AerCap Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Delta TechOps Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Lufthansa Technik AG Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
TransDigm Group Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Aviation Technical Services, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Heico Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Satair Group Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Woodward, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Air Transport Services Group, LLC Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
GA Telesis, LLC Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Aersale's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Aersale's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Aersale Corporation Asset Management Solutions 52.33 % Tech Ops 47.67 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).