American International Holdings's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of American International Holdings (AMIH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: American International Holdings vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 1,117,171M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+97.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-24.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: American International Holdings generated 398.8% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2023, vs 9.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -846.6% net margin compares with 4.6% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: American International Holdings accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.00M compares with $1.85M for the peer group (0.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
AMIH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2023
American International Holdings reported revenue growth of 398.75 % year on year in Q1 2023, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.92 %.
With a net margin of -846.57 %, American International Holdings reported lower profitability than its competitors (4.60 %).
American International Holdings generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
American International Holdings vs. its Competitors, Q1 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across American International Holdings and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across American International Holdings's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.3% year over year, combined, vs 398.8% for American International Holdings. American International Holdings's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
American International Holdings's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
AMIH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
AMIH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Centene Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Humana Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Molina Healthcare Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | The Cigna Group | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for American International Holdings's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of American International Holdings Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | 0.15 | 0.10 |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | 342,313.98 | 450,129.00 |
| The Cigna Group | 71,752.79 | 282,382.00 |
| Humana Inc | 47,009.28 | 137,200.00 |
| Centene Corporation | 31,097.34 | 202,938.00 |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | 9,728.53 | 44,522.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 501,902.06 | 1,117,171.10 |
Sources: American International Holdings Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on American International Holdings Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
American International Holdings's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | UnitedHealthcare 76.78 % |
| The Cigna Group | Evernorth 85.32 % |
| Humana Inc | Insurance 96.00 % |
| Centene Corporation | Medicaid 59.67 % |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | Medicaid 74.02 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
American International Holdings's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | 0 | 4,444 | -55,130 |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | 342,314 | 1,154,177 | 38,236 |
| The Cigna Group | 71,753 | 4,171,078 | 103,146 |
| Humana Inc | 47,009 | 2,045,929 | 17,074 |
| Centene Corporation | 31,097 | 3,321,408 | -83,568 |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | 9,729 | 2,343,263 | -368 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 501,902 | 1,846,991 | 29,638 |
American International Holdings's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 113 companies in American International Holdings's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.American International Holdings ranks #0 of 113 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 788, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shell Plc | 289,637 | 19.00 % |
| 2 | Totalenergies Se | 216,606 | 14.21 % |
| 3 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 104,814 | 6.88 % |
| 4 | Eni Spa | 96,185 | 6.31 % |
| 5 | Slb Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Eog Resources Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Cenovus Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Diamondback Energy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Devon Energy Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | American International Holdings Corp | - | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of American International Holdings's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-25.
American International Holdings's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (165 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.25 % | 57.30 % (avg) | -26.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -1,466.51 % | industry median | -1,505.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 313.68 % | 11.81 % (avg) | +301.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 24.95 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
American International Holdings's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (165 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 15.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.4x | 8.9x | -4.5x |
| P/B | -0.2x | 1.8x | -2.0x |
| Return on Equity | 43.70 % | industry aggregate | -1.33 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 26.15 % | 5.38 % (avg) | 20.77 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
American International Holdings's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | - | -99.65 % | 206.90 % |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - | -58.38 % | -34,683.04 % | -3,923.29 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.98 % | -3.03 % | 69.15 % | 25,396.42 % | -429.70 % | 691.23 % | 145.18 % | 26.08 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
American International Holdings's Strategic Group Map
Every company in American International Holdings's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. American International Holdings is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
American International Holdings's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 788 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See American International Holdings's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See American International Holdings's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
American International Holdings's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
American International Holdings falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
American International Holdings's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+97.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 1,505.3 points below the industry median.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-24.0% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
American International Holdings's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | 0.02 | 0.08 | - |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.24 | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| The Cigna Group | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Humana Inc | 0.26 | 1.93 | 0.70 |
| Centene Corporation | 0.52 | 1.10 | 0.98 |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | 0.61 | 1.66 | 0.91 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
American International Holdings's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | Q1 2023 | +398.8 % | - |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +0.4 % | +58.7 % |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.7 % | +22.4 % |
| Humana Inc | Q1 2026 | +23.5 % | -4.7 % |
| Centene Corporation | Q2 2026 | +9.9 % | - |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.8 % | -76.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.2 % | +55.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
American International Holdings's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | Q1 2023 | +6,395.0 % | - |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +2.7 % | -9.8 % |
| The Cigna Group | Q2 2026 | +6.4 % | - |
| Humana Inc | Q1 2026 | - | +27.4 % |
| Centene Corporation | Q2 2026 | +13.7 % | -16.3 % |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.0 % | -28.6 % |
American International Holdings's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | - | - | - |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | 4.78% | 7.51% | 14.55% |
| The Cigna Group | 4.46% | 6.88% | 16.50% |
| Humana Inc | 2.24% | 3.44% | 6.25% |
| Centene Corporation | - | - | - |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
American International Holdings's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| American International Holdings Corp | - | 1.47 |
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | 24.31 | 0.76 |
| The Cigna Group | 11.27 | 0.25 |
| Humana Inc | 41.60 | 0.34 |
| Centene Corporation | - | 0.15 |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | - | 0.22 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 28.00 | 0.45 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.