Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Aixcrypto Holdings Inc (AIXC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Aixcrypto Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- Scale: Aixcrypto Holdings Inc ranks #88 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (79) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
AIXC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
AIXC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Climb Bio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Praxis Precision Medicines Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Gossamer Bio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Prelude Therapeutics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Aixcrypto Holdings Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | 20.49 | - |
| Eli Lilly And Company | 1,060,477.83 | 79,665.80 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 652,141.13 | 97,929.00 |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | 560,340.86 | 6,128.24 |
| Merck and Co Inc | 366,004.60 | 66,569.00 |
| Novartis Ag | 282,634.35 | 56,674.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 4,295,182.91 | 648,615.88 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Sources: Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Aixcrypto Holdings Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Eli Lilly And Company | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Johnson and Johnson | Oncology 29.26 % |
| Merck and Co Inc | Pharmaceutical segment 88.88 % |
| Amgen Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | Pharmaceuticals 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | 20 | - | - |
| Eli Lilly And Company | 1,060,478 | 1,593,316 | 534,224 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 652,141 | 695,518 | 149,411 |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | 560,341 | 510,686 | 54,642 |
| Merck and Co Inc | 366,005 | 887,587 | 42,267 |
| Novartis Ag | 282,634 | 752,973 | 185,566 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 4,295,162 | 981,762 | 158,393 |
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Eli Lilly And Company | United States 61.21 % |
| Johnson and Johnson | United States 57.42 % |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | United States 51.69 % |
| Merck and Co Inc | EMEA 23.60 % |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | United States 70.78 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 103 companies in Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Aixcrypto Holdings Inc ranks #88 of 103 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,335, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Express Company | 206,654 | 32.26 % |
| 2 | Nu Holdings Ltd | 59,600 | 9.30 % |
| 3 | Coinbase Global Inc | 49,599 | 7.74 % |
| 4 | Eason Technology Limited | 37,743 | 5.89 % |
| 5 | Strategy Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Synchrony Financial | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Circle Internet Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Sofi Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 88 | Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | 20 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83 | Fold Holdings Inc | 29 | -84.64 % |
| 84 | Canaan Inc | 26 | -57.74 % |
| 85 | Pineapple Financial Inc | 25 | -82.99 % |
| 86 | Atlasclear Holdings Inc | 24 | -73.76 % |
| 87 | Orion Digital Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 88 | Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | 20 | -73.32 % |
| 89 | Nft Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 90 | Binah Capital Group inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 91 | Strategic Acquisitions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 92 | Sphere 3d Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 93 | Dave Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-30. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry average (80 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Miscellaneous Financial Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 18.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 15.3x | - |
| P/B | 1.0x | 3.1x | -2.1x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 0.51 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | -58.40 % | -64.05 % | -264.88 % | 158.70 % | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,335 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (36.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | 5.50 | 8.84 | 0.04 |
| Eli Lilly And Company | 0.20 | 1.48 | 1.59 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 0.37 | 1.05 | 0.60 |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | 2.30 | 3.16 | 0.23 |
| Merck and Co Inc | 0.40 | 1.46 | 1.01 |
| Novartis Ag | 0.42 | 1.12 | 0.02 |
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Eli Lilly And Company | Q2 2026 | +47.7 % | +25.3 % |
| Johnson and Johnson | Q2 2026 | +6.6 % | -0.1 % |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | Q2 2026 | +29.7 % | +151.3 % |
| Merck and Co Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.1 % | - |
| Novartis Ag | Q4 2025 | +9.6 % | +17.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.7 % | -15.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Eli Lilly And Company | Q2 2026 | +33.5 % | +72.8 % |
| Johnson and Johnson | Q2 2026 | +5.5 % | +26.7 % |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | Q2 2026 | +6.4 % | -57.0 % |
| Merck and Co Inc | Q2 2026 | +23.6 % | +16.9 % |
| Novartis Ag | Q4 2025 | +18.3 % | +13.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
| Eli Lilly And Company | 21.97% | 33.95% | 92.54% |
| Johnson and Johnson | 10.60% | 13.30% | 25.74% |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | 7.82% | 10.32% | 14.24% |
| Merck and Co Inc | 2.42% | 3.24% | 6.59% |
| Novartis Ag | 12.59% | 12.62% | 30.00% |
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Aixcrypto Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Aixcrypto Holdings Inc | - | - |
| Eli Lilly And Company | 39.83 | 13.31 |
| Johnson and Johnson | 30.93 | 6.66 |
| Beone Medicines Ltd | 845.98 | 91.44 |
| Merck and Co Inc | 119.50 | 5.50 |
| Novartis Ag | 20.21 | 4.99 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 41.05 | 6.62 |
Sign in to see all peers for Aixcrypto Holdings Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.