Ubs Ag's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ubs Ag (UBS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ubs Ag vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 67,739M vs 5,847M combined for tracked competitors (92.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+13.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ubs Ag generated 15.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 27.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 5.3% net margin compares with 14.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Ubs Ag ranks #5 of 33 companies by market capitalization in the Money Center Banks industry, holding 7.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Ubs Ag accounted for 97.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 97.8% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.09M compares with $1.53M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
UBS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Ubs Ag reported revenue growth of 15.47 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 27.81 %.
With a net margin of 5.26 %, Ubs Ag reported lower profitability than its competitors (14.84 %).
Ubs Ag generated 97.60 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 97.83 % a year earlier.
Ubs Ag vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ubs Ag and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ubs Ag's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Money Center Banks industry grew revenue -2.5% year over year, combined, vs 15.5% for Ubs Ag. Ubs Ag's share of combined industry revenue moved from 6.06% to 7.18%, a gain of 1.11 percentage points.
Ubs Ag's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (5) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
UBS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
UBS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
UBS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gladstone Land Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Farmland Partners Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Alti Global Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Evercore Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Perella Weinberg Partners | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ubs Ag's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Ubs Ag's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Ubs Ag
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | 159,971.73 | 67,739.00 |
| Evercore Inc | 10,761.48 | 4,741.99 |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | 1,489.36 | 689.25 |
| Farmland Partners Inc | 465.77 | 51.46 |
| Gladstone Land Corp | 402.08 | 88.48 |
| Alti Global Inc | 342.55 | 276.01 |
| SUBTOTAL | 173,432.97 | 73,586.19 |
Sources: Ubs Ag's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ubs Ag versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ubs Ag's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| BNP Paribas | Named by the company | 85% |
| JPMorgan Chase | Named by the company | 85% |
| Raymond James | Named by the company | 85% |
| HSBC | Named by the company | 85% |
| PostFinance | Named by the company | 85% |
| Deutsche Bank | Named by the company | 85% |
| Julius Baer | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wells Fargo | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bank of America | Named by the company | 85% |
| Immoscout24 | Named by the company | 85% |
| Raiffeisen | Named by the company | 85% |
| Homegate | Named by the company | 85% |
| Morgan Stanley | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gladstone Land Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Evercore Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | Named by the company | 85% |
| Farmland Partners Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alti Global Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ubs Ag's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Ubs Ag's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Evercore Inc | Investment Banking and Equities 97.29 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Ubs Ag's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | 159,972 | 1,094,347 | 125,963 |
| Evercore Inc | 10,761 | 1,845,132 | 314,863 |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | 1,489 | 936,477 | 37,973 |
| Farmland Partners Inc | 466 | 1,354,342 | 685,895 |
| Gladstone Land Corp | 402 | - | - |
| Alti Global Inc | 343 | 563,280 | -294,910 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 13,461 | 1,525,089 | 184,544 |
Ubs Ag's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Perella Weinberg Partners | United States 82.75 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Ubs Ag's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 31 companies in Ubs Ag's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ubs Ag ranks #5 of 31 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 7.73 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 838, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal Bank Of Canada | 281,709 | 12.93 % |
| 2 | Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Group Inc | 272,377 | 12.51 % |
| 3 | Santander Uk Group Holdings Plc | 256,630 | 11.78 % |
| 4 | Toronto dominion Bank | 201,406 | 9.25 % |
| 5 | Ubs Ag | 168,327 | 7.73 % |
| 6 | Natwest Group Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Ing Groep Nv | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Bank Of Montreal | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Barclays Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Grupo Aval Acciones Y Valores S a | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ubs Ag's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Ubs Ag's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal Bank Of Canada | 281,709 | 38.48 % |
| 2 | Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Group Inc | 272,377 | 48.17 % |
| 3 | Santander Uk Group Holdings Plc | 256,630 | 39.19 % |
| 4 | Toronto dominion Bank | 201,406 | 52.96 % |
| 5 | Ubs Ag | 168,327 | 21.42 % |
| 6 | Natwest Group Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Ing Groep Nv | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Bank Of Montreal | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Barclays Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Grupo Aval Acciones Y Valores S a | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ubs Ag's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Ubs Ag's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Ubs Ag's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Ubs Ag falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.60x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 13.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Ubs Ag's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 838 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ubs Ag's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ubs Ag's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ubs Ag's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ubs Ag falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ubs Ag's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 13.8% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (60.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ubs Ag's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | - | - | - |
| Evercore Inc | 0.94 | 2.54 | 0.26 |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | 3.51 | 4.50 | - |
| Farmland Partners Inc | 0.00 | 1.29 | 0.55 |
| Gladstone Land Corp | 1.03 | 1.21 | 0.19 |
| Alti Global Inc | - | - | 0.01 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ubs Ag's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | Q4 2025 | +15.5 % | +51.5 % |
| Evercore Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.1 % | -0.4 % |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | Q2 2026 | +0.8 % | +48.3 % |
| Farmland Partners Inc | Q2 2026 | -5.7 % | -59.8 % |
| Gladstone Land Corp | Q2 2026 | +3.2 % | - |
| Alti Global Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.6 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +15.5 % | +50.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ubs Ag's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | Q4 2025 | +17.7 % | - |
| Evercore Inc | Q2 2026 | +97.1 % | -58.8 % |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | Q2 2026 | - | +110.4 % |
| Farmland Partners Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +90.1 % |
| Gladstone Land Corp | Q2 2026 | - | -91.7 % |
| Alti Global Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +2,991.7 % |
Ubs Ag's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | 0.48% | 0.48% | 8.62% |
| Evercore Inc | 17.22% | 21.62% | 37.32% |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | 4.16% | 4.46% | - |
| Farmland Partners Inc | 3.63% | 3.86% | 5.63% |
| Gladstone Land Corp | - | - | - |
| Alti Global Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ubs Ag's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ubs Ag | 20.60 | 2.36 |
| Evercore Inc | 14.72 | 2.27 |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | 44.36 | 2.16 |
| Farmland Partners Inc | 8.80 | 9.05 |
| Gladstone Land Corp | - | 4.54 |
| Alti Global Inc | - | 1.24 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 20.39 | 2.36 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.