Seaspan's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Seaspan (SSW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Seaspan vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,096M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Seaspan accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SSW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2018
Seaspan generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Marine Transportation industry grew revenue 2.3% year over year, combined, vs 31.9% for Seaspan. Seaspan's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.91% to 2.46%, a gain of 0.55 percentage points.
Seaspan's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seaspan Corp | - | - | - | - |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SSW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SSW Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Seaspan's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Danaos Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Seaspan's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.