Planet Green Holdings's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Planet Green Holdings (PLAG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Planet Green Holdings vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8M vs 120,932M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-62.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (-1.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Planet Green Holdings generated 25,390.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -1.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -145.4% net margin compares with -17.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Planet Green Holdings ranks #47 of 62 companies by market capitalization in the Food Processing industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Planet Green Holdings accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.19M compares with $0.44M for the peer group (0.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
PLAG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Planet Green Holdings reported revenue growth of 25,390.42 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -1.62 %.
With a net margin of -145.42 %, Planet Green Holdings reported lower profitability than its competitors (-17.64 %).
Planet Green Holdings generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Planet Green Holdings vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Planet Green Holdings and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Planet Green Holdings's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Food Processing industry grew revenue 12.8% year over year, combined, vs 25,390.4% for Planet Green Holdings. Planet Green Holdings's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Planet Green Holdings's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (8) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 42.90 % (3 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
PLAG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
PLAG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
PLAG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
PLAG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tyson Foods Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Kraft Heinz Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Hormel Foods Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Treehouse Foods Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Planet Green Holdings's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Planet Green Holdings's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Planet Green Holdings Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | 10.25 | 8.44 |
| Kraft Heinz Co | 27,942.16 | 24,900.00 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087.25 | 55,694.00 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 11,004.95 | 12,147.26 |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | 6,713.88 | 18,435.70 |
| The Campbells Company | 6,012.00 | 9,744.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 71,012.51 | 124,275.77 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Sources: Planet Green Holdings Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Planet Green Holdings Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Planet Green Holdings's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Jingshan Sanhe Luckysky | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jilin Chuangyuan | Named by the company | 85% |
| Minerva S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jingshan Sanhe | Named by the company | 85% |
| Global Blue Group Holding Ag | Named by the company | 85% |
| sinal S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Planet Green Holdings's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Planet Green Holdings's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Kraft Heinz Co | North America 73.72 % |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Beef 37.15 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Retail 60.21 % |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | U.S. Reportable 58.14 % |
| The Campbells Company | Meals & Beverages 64.35 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Planet Green Holdings's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | 10 | 187,581 | -578,922 |
| Kraft Heinz Co | 27,942 | 711,429 | -97,143 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087 | 418,752 | 4,496 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 11,005 | 607,363 | 17,123 |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | 6,714 | 293,095 | 8,675 |
| The Campbells Company | 6,012 | 721,778 | 29,852 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 71,002 | 440,924 | -6,339 |
Sign in to see all peers for Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Planet Green Holdings's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | United States 55.93 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Planet Green Holdings's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 53 companies in Planet Green Holdings's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Planet Green Holdings ranks #47 of 53 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,029, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mondel z International Inc | 77,057 | 25.34 % |
| 2 | Hershey Co | 33,750 | 11.10 % |
| 3 | Kraft Heinz Co | 27,966 | 9.20 % |
| 4 | Tyson Foods Inc | 18,027 | 5.93 % |
| 5 | General Mills Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Magnum Ice Cream Co N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | The J M Smucker Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hormel Foods Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Smithfield Foods Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 47 | Planet Green Holdings Corp | 10 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Planet Green Holdings's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Planet Green Holdings's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | The Hain Celestial Group Inc | 44 | -68.91 % |
| 43 | Laird Superfood Inc | 38 | -42.95 % |
| 44 | Borealis Foods Inc | 28 | -44.73 % |
| 45 | Coffee Holding Co Inc | 23 | -12.28 % |
| 46 | Barfresh Food Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 47 | Planet Green Holdings Corp | 10 | -60.41 % |
| 48 | Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 49 | Nightfood Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 50 | Nocera Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 51 | Tofutti Brands Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 52 | Blue Star Foods Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Planet Green Holdings's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Planet Green Holdings's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Food Processing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (79 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.24 % | 26.42 % (avg) | -7.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -200.68 % | industry median | -205.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -194.68 % | -1.80 % (avg) | -192.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 4.50 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Planet Green Holdings's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Food Processing industry average (79 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 26.5x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 12.9x | - |
| P/B | -12.6x | 2.9x | -15.5x |
| Return on Equity | 1,468.52 % | industry aggregate | 1,466.54 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 612.04 % | 0.69 % (avg) | 611.35 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Planet Green Holdings's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -93.59 % | - | - | -11.53 % | 500.00 % | 18.50 % | -75.18 % | -54.82 % |
| Operating Margin | -809.26 % | - | -20.07 % | -76.61 % | -16.51 % | -11.78 % | -99.02 % | -583.39 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -53.35 % | - | -2.78 % | -6.52 % | -6.31 % | -4.82 % | -19.44 % | -185.20 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Planet Green Holdings's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Planet Green Holdings's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Planet Green Holdings is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Planet Green Holdings's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Planet Green Holdings's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Planet Green Holdings falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 1.7% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Planet Green Holdings's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,029 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Planet Green Holdings's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Planet Green Holdings's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Planet Green Holdings's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Planet Green Holdings falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Planet Green Holdings's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 1,466.5 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 205.4 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-62.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (42.90 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Planet Green Holdings's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | 0.01 | 0.57 | - |
| Kraft Heinz Co | 0.30 | 1.13 | 0.51 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 0.15 | 1.58 | 0.57 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 0.47 | 2.15 | 0.45 |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | 0.20 | 1.45 | 0.19 |
| The Campbells Company | 0.09 | 0.82 | 1.78 |
Sign in to see all peers for Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Planet Green Holdings's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | Q2 2026 | +25,390.4 % | - |
| Kraft Heinz Co | Q2 2026 | -1.4 % | - |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.1 % | +169.6 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.3 % | -67.6 % |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.8 % | -96.3 % |
| The Campbells Company | Q2 2026 | -7.9 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -1.6 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Planet Green Holdings's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | Q2 2026 | +43,041.4 % | - |
| Kraft Heinz Co | Q2 2026 | +1.6 % | +1.1 % |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.6 % | -30.0 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.2 % | -5.6 % |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.0 % | - |
| The Campbells Company | Q2 2026 | -3.8 % | -55.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Planet Green Holdings's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | - | - | - |
| Kraft Heinz Co | - | - | - |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 1.66% | 1.98% | 3.28% |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 2.56% | 2.95% | 4.33% |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | 5.39% | 6.98% | 14.80% |
| The Campbells Company | 2.65% | 2.91% | 10.24% |
Sign in to see all peers for Planet Green Holdings Corp.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Planet Green Holdings's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdings Corp | - | 1.21 |
| Kraft Heinz Co | - | 1.12 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 31.43 | 0.32 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 31.78 | 0.91 |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | 12.23 | 0.36 |
| The Campbells Company | 15.07 | 0.62 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.57 |
Sign in to see all peers for Planet Green Holdings Corp.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.