Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Mitek Systems Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
18.17 %
Q3 2026
Net Margin
15.48 %
Q3 2026

Key Findings: Mitek Systems Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 198M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+9.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Mitek Systems Inc ranks #10 of 22 companies by market capitalization in the Computer Peripherals & Office Equipment industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Mitek Systems Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

MITK Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026

Mitek Systems Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MITK/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MITK/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/MITK/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Computer Peripherals & Office Equipment industry grew revenue 12.3% year over year, combined, vs 18.2% for Mitek Systems Inc. Mitek Systems Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.36% to 0.38%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.

Mitek Systems Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Mitek Systems Inc Yes Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 0% 50% 0% 50%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 60% 80% 60% 22%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 5)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2026

100%market share
  • Mitek Systems Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Mitek Systems Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Mitek Systems Inc's full market share breakdown »

MITK Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

MITK Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Mitek Systems Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 2)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(2 of 10)
42.9%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Mitek Systems Inc 72.10 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Mitek Systems Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

MITK Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

MITK High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

MITK Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

MITK Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

MITK Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

MITK Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Mitek Systems Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the identity verification, authentication, and fraud prevention industry, which is characterized by intense competition and rapid change. Competitors often possess greater financial, technical, and marketing resources, and new entrants regularly enter the market. Competition centers on price, accuracy, reliability, global coverage, and technical support. Key competitors include customer-developed solutions, providers of alternative fraud and identity solutions, and companies offering technologies for mobile remote deposit capture. The company must continually invest in compliance and product adaptation to address evolving regulatory requirements and the increasing use of artificial intelligence by enterprises and fraudsters, which introduces risks such as synthetic identities and deepfakes. Inability to respond to these factors may negatively impact the company's competitiveness, revenues, and operating results.

Mitek Systems Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
T Stamp Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ipsidy Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mitek Systems Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.