Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Applied Minerals Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Applied Minerals Inc (AMNL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2020
Competitors Tracked
12
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.00 %
vs 0.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
392.67 %
Peers: -4.70 %
Net Margin
-523.75 %
Peers: 3.38 %

Key Findings: Applied Minerals Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 105,759M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+46.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-49.8%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Applied Minerals Inc generated 392.7% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2020, vs -4.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its -523.8% net margin compares with 3.4% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Applied Minerals Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.02M compares with $1.05M for the peer group (0.0x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

AMNL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2020

Applied Minerals Inc reported revenue growth of 392.67 % year on year in Q3 2020, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -4.70 %.

With a net margin of -523.75 %, Applied Minerals Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (3.38 %).

Applied Minerals Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/AMNL/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/AMNL/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/AMNL/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Applied Minerals Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2020

Revenue growth, year on year

Applied Minerals Inc +392.7 %
Competitors combined -4.7 %

Net margin

Applied Minerals Inc -523.8 %
Competitors combined +3.4 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Applied Minerals Inc +46.9 %
Competitors combined -49.8 %

TTM net margin

Applied Minerals Inc -377.2 %
Competitors combined +5.4 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Applied Minerals Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Applied Minerals Inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (4) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Applied Minerals Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 11.9% year over year, combined, vs 392.7% for Applied Minerals Inc. Applied Minerals Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Applied Minerals Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Applied Minerals Inc No No No No
Competitors combined (12) 70% 89% 67% 27%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2020

0%market share
  • Applied Minerals Inc0.0%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Applied Minerals Inc and its 12 tracked competitors.

See Applied Minerals Inc's full market share breakdown »

AMNL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

AMNL Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Applied Minerals Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(4 of 8)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 3)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Applied Minerals Inc - -
Competitors combined (8) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Applied Minerals Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

AMNL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

AMNL Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Nucor Corporation 282.9% Outperformed
2 Steel Dynamics Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Reliance Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Mcewen Inc 282.9% Outperformed
5 Commercial Metals Company 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Applied Minerals Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Applied Minerals Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Competition from Other Miners of Halloysite

Currently there is limited competition involving the sale of halloysite-based products in our advanced applications target markets. If our DRAGONITE penetrates our advanced application target markets, we may face significant competition from such competitors as well as non-halloysite solutions often sold by larger, more established companies. The basis for competition is performance, price and reliability. If we are successful in penetrating our advanced applications target markets, we may face significant competition from producers of halloysite.

Despite the widespread occurrence of halloysite, large deposits from which high purity halloysite can be economically extracted are comparatively rare. These include deposits with high-grade zones that are dominantly halloysite and lower grade deposits where halloysite can be readily separated to give a high purity product. Relatively pure halloysite typically occurs as narrow lenses or pockets in altered rock and often requires selective mining and sorting to produce a high-grade product. Halloysite is often associated with fine-grained kaolinite, silica or other fine-grained mineral contaminants. using beneficiation methods that rely primarily on wet size classification.

The production of high-grade halloysite from large deposits for specialist industrial use at present is limited to the Dragon Mine and open pit mines owned by Imerys, a large French minerals company, in Northland, New Zealand. The New Zealand mines produce about 15,000 tons of halloysite per year. The raw clay from New Zealand contains around 50% halloysite, 50% silica minerals (quartz, cristobalite, tridymite, amorphous silica), and minor feldspar. It must be processed to eliminate the silica materials, which are classified as carcinogens. The exact percentages of silica and cristobalite in Imerys’ halloysite products is not known, but Imerys’ Safety Data Sheet for its premium halloysite filter cake indicates that the levels of cristobalite and silica are less than 10%. The permitted exposure levels for cristobalite are one–half of the permitted exposure levels for crystalline silica. Our Safety Data Sheet indicates that our processed halloysite “may contain naturally occurring Respirable Crystalline Silica (CAS #’s 14808-60-7 and 14464-46-1) at trace concentration levels below HazCom 2012 and GHS Revision 3 hazard classification limits. Per XRC analysis, which combines the analytical capabilities of X-Ray Diffraction, Computer Controlled Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy and Raman Spectroscopy to conduct particle-by-particle inter-instrumental relocation and physicochemical/mineralogical analysis - naturally occurring trace level substances in these products, including Respirable Crystalline Silica, are inextricably bound, environmentally unavailable and at de minimis concentrations. Thus, in the current and anticipated future physical state of these products, they are believed to be incapable of causing harm under normal conditions of use or as a result of extreme upset.” Our halloysite does not contain cristobalite.

Imerys’ halloysite has low amounts of Fe2O3. Some of our raw halloysite may contain more Fe2O3 but it can be processed out through bleaching or can be reduced through blending with purer halloysite.


Imerys’ website indicates that its halloysite is sold for use in tableware, but an article from 2000 indicated that a small percentage was being sold for use in synthetic zeolite-base molecular sieves and in the manufacture of honeycomb catalyst supports. We have no information to indicate that it being sold for those purposes now.

Smaller or lower grade deposits occur in many countries including Japan, Korea, China, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, South America, and Europe. It is reported that halloysite from China, Brazil, and Turkey is sold commercially. Halloysite is typically used for ceramics and for paper coating and a small percentage of the halloysite from Turkey is sold for use in catalysts.

The degree or extent to which the halloysite from other deposits can or will compete with our halloysite-based products is subject to a variety of factors, including the following:


Deposits of halloysite are formed under a variety of geological conditions of hydrothermal alteration and weathering. As a result, the nature and extent of impurities, the length of the tube, thickness of the walls, and the size of the pore or lumen can all vary. In many deposits, the halloysite is mixed with other clays, limiting its usefulness for certain applications. Other deposits can contain significant amounts of crystalline silica and/or cristobalite, which may limit the usefulness for certain applications and/or require additional processing, although given the fine grain of silica and cristobalite, there are limits to the ability to eliminate them. Other deposits contain more iron oxide than is acceptable, requiring additional processing


Some deposits are subject to difficulties relating to mining. Some deposits are located in geographically isolated areas.

The global resource base for halloysite might be expanded to meet substantial growth in demand, especially if demand was for higher-value markets that would justify higher costs for mining and processing out containments. Such expansion might be anticipated both through the discovery of new deposits and through the adoption of more elaborate process methods to separate halloysite occurring within lower-grade sources. Competition from the other halloysite producers could arise and could adversely affect sales and margins and such competition would be based on performance and/or price.

Competition from Suppliers of Alternative Solutions to Halloysite

When we market halloysite for use in situations where halloysite has not been previously used, or is to be used as an additive in substitution for another additive to enhance certain functionality of an application, we will face competition from suppliers of other solutions and the competition will be based on performance, price and reliability.

Competition for Iron Oxide

We expect to compete with companies that, in some cases, may be larger and better capitalized than us. Because individual iron oxide deposits can differ in significant respects, our iron oxide may not be suitable for certain uses and we may have to demonstrate that our iron oxide will actually work for the manufacturer’s particular need and we can encounter problems in getting manufacturers to test our product and even if such tests are successful, to use our iron oxide.

There is significant competition within the iron oxide pigment market. We will try to compete directly with established synthetic iron oxide pigments in the coatings markets by selling our pigments at a lower price. In other iron oxide pigment markets, there can be very little product differentiation with competition focused primarily on price, performance and reliability.

Publicly Traded Peers of Applied Minerals Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Applied Minerals Inc 0.03 0.60 -2.28 32
Nucor Corporation 55,865.97 36,101.00 3,256.00 33,000
Steel Dynamics Inc 33,312.32 20,538.68 1,599.33 14,400
Reliance Inc 20,349.38 14,835.60 806.70 15,700
Scandium International Mining Corp 7,868.08 0.28 -0.37 5
Commercial Metals Company 7,204.49 8,850.09 783.95 12,690
SUBTOTAL 133,901.81 105,760.04 5,743.77 100,985
7 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Applied Minerals Inc .

Sources: Applied Minerals Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Applied Minerals Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Applied Minerals Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Alternative Solutions Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Applied Minerals Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Applied Minerals Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Nucor Corporation Steel mills 63.56 % Steel products 29.34 % Raw materials 7.10 %
Reliance Inc Metals Service Centers Segment 100.00 % - -
Commercial Metals Company North America Steel Group 72.06 % Construction Solutions Group 15.89 % Europe Steel Group 11.73 %
Cleveland cliffs Inc Steelmaking 97.51 % Other Businesses 3.39 % Eliminations -0.90 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Applied Minerals Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Applied Minerals Inc 0 18,902 -71,300
Nucor Corporation 55,866 1,093,970 98,667
Steel Dynamics Inc 33,312 1,426,297 111,065
Reliance Inc 20,349 944,943 51,382
Scandium International Mining Corp 7,868 55,444 -73,769
Commercial Metals Company 7,204 697,406 61,777
PEERS TOTAL 133,902 1,047,611 56,918
7 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Applied Minerals Inc .

Applied Minerals Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Steel Dynamics Inc US 92.24 % Non Us 7.76 % -
Ryerson Holding Corporation US 92.82 % Non Us 7.18 % -

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Applied Minerals Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Construction Raw Materials industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (45 companies). See the full Construction Raw Materials industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 100.00 % 29.19 % (avg) +70.8 pp
Operating Margin -324.22 % industry median -330.1 pp
EBITDA Margin -176.25 % 8.38 % (avg) -184.6 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.00 % 12.01 % (avg) -12.0 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Applied Minerals Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Construction Raw Materials industry average (45 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Construction Raw Materials industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 26.6x -
EV / EBITDA - 14.0x -
P/B 0.0x 2.6x -2.7x
Return on Equity 4.48 % industry aggregate -7.25 %
Return on Invested Capital 2.98 % 0.69 % (avg) 2.29 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Applied Minerals Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 2015201620172018201920202021
Revenue Growth 116.66 %500.00 %-39.08 %99.34 %-90.03 %80.88 %60.27 %
Operating Margin -1,954.15 %-113.63 %-214.25 %-41.06 %-831.90 %-322.31 %-148.51 %
Return on Invested Capital 214.08 %34.65 %20.45 %5.42 %9.59 %5.89 %3.98 %
P/E -------

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Applied Minerals Inc's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Applied Minerals Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Applied Minerals Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)CUOCSTEYECOFUUUUCVIAQSCIOCHNCApplied Minerals IncDLCR

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Applied Minerals Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 12.01 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Applied Minerals Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Applied Minerals Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Applied Minerals Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest Applied Minerals Inc

Applied Minerals Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Applied Minerals Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+46.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

  • Operating margin 330.1 points below the industry median.
  • Return on equity 7.3 points below the industry aggregate.

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-49.8% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Applied Minerals Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Applied Minerals Inc 0.01 0.03 - 0.50
Nucor Corporation 0.52 2.76 0.31 1.01
Steel Dynamics Inc 0.31 3.12 0.46 1.24
Reliance Inc 0.23 4.15 0.21 1.41
Scandium International Mining Corp 3.90 4.01 - 0.17
Commercial Metals Company 0.58 2.55 0.74 1.05
7 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Applied Minerals Inc .

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Applied Minerals Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Applied Minerals Inc Q3 2020-69.0 %+5.3 %--
Nucor CorporationQ2 2026+23.0 %+9.5 %+81.3 %+47.1 %
Steel Dynamics Inc Q2 2026+33.4 %+17.0 %+76.2 %+32.7 %
Reliance Inc Q1 2026+15.5 %+15.1 %+32.5 %+127.2 %
Scandium International Mining Corp Q3 2024----
Commercial Metals CompanyQ2 2026+22.9 %+16.5 %+335.3 %+289.0 %
PEERS TOTAL+22.7 %+12.6 %+186.3 %+80.4 %
7 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Applied Minerals Inc .

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Applied Minerals Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Applied Minerals Inc Q3 2020----
Nucor CorporationQ2 2026+15.6 %+4.6 %-40.1 %-13.6 %
Steel Dynamics Inc Q2 2026+30.0 %+15.6 %-57.0 %-10.2 %
Reliance Inc Q1 2026+16.4 %+12.2 %-26.1 %-12.3 %
Scandium International Mining Corp Q3 2024----
Commercial Metals CompanyQ2 2026+17.9 %+16.3 %+74.6 %-
7 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Applied Minerals Inc .

Applied Minerals Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Applied Minerals Inc ---14.13-
Nucor Corporation9.14%9.96%14.49%10.315.42
Steel Dynamics Inc 9.66%10.53%17.76%10.444.74
Reliance Inc 7.64%8.27%11.18%8.684.71
Scandium International Mining Corp -----
Commercial Metals Company9.30%9.96%18.10%6.986.89
7 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Applied Minerals Inc .

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Applied Minerals Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Applied Minerals Inc -0.05-0.06-
Nucor Corporation19.511.550.16105.012.40
Steel Dynamics Inc 20.941.620.46303.643.54
Reliance Inc 25.571.372.50-2.85
Scandium International Mining Corp -28,382.19--6,595.62
Commercial Metals Company12.190.810.01-1.59
PEERS AVERAGE23.311.27398.272.57
7 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Applied Minerals Inc .

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.