Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5,781M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd ranks #9 of 57 companies by market capitalization in the Marine Transportation industry, holding 3.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ZIM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Marine Transportation industry grew revenue 2.3% year over year, combined, vs -20.8% for Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 16.78% to 12.99%, a loss of 3.79 percentage points.
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ZIM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ZIM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
ZIM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
ZIM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| COSCO | Named by the company | 85% |
| A.P. Moller-Maersk Line | Named by the company | 85% |
| Seaspan | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kenon Holdings Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Maersk | Named by the company | 85% |
| CMA-CGM | Named by the company | 85% |
| Matson inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| MSC | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.