Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Vital Farms Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Vital Farms Inc (VITL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-9.66 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-18.71 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Vital Farms Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 766M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-13.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Vital Farms Inc ranks #34 of 62 companies by market capitalization in the Food Processing industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Vital Farms Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

VITL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Vital Farms Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/VITL/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/VITL/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/VITL/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Food Processing industry grew revenue 12.8% year over year, combined, vs -9.7% for Vital Farms Inc. Vital Farms Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.16% to 0.13%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.

Vital Farms Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Vital Farms Inc Yes Yes Yes Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 0% 0% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 38% 50% 50% 30%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 40.00 % (2 of 5)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Vital Farms Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Vital Farms Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Vital Farms Inc's full market share breakdown »

VITL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

VITL Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Vital Farms Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(3 of 9)
28.6%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Vital Farms Inc -77.20 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Vital Farms Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

VITL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

VITL High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

VITL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

VITL Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

VITL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

VITL Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Vital Farms Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive market for egg and butter products, facing competition from private-label producers and other branded companies. Key competitors include large egg producers such as Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., and international food companies like Ornua Co-operative Limited (Kerrygold). The company also competes with local and regional egg and dairy producers, as well as private-label specialty products processed by other egg and dairy companies. Competitive factors include product quality and taste, brand recognition and loyalty, product variety, packaging and design, shelf space, reputation, price, advertising, promotion, and nutritional claims.

Vital Farms Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Ornua Co-operative Limited (Kerrygold) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ornua (Kerrygold) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Vital Farms Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License