Urban Gro Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Urban Gro Inc (UGRO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Urban Gro Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 28M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-99.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Urban Gro Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
UGRO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Urban Gro Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Construction & Mining Machinery industry grew revenue 6.1% year over year, combined, vs -99.4% for Urban Gro Inc. Urban Gro Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.00%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
UGRO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
Urban Gro Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Urban Gro Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Big Bash League (BBL) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pakistan Super League (PSL) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Caribbean Premier League (CPL) | Named by the company | 85% |
| SA20 | Named by the company | 85% |
| Indian Premier League (IPL) | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Urban Gro Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
