Nanobiotix S A's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Nanobiotix S A (NBTX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Nanobiotix S A vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 37M vs 4,413M combined for its competitors (0.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+296.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+17.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Profitability: Its -73.5% net margin compares with -21.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Nanobiotix S A ranks #134 of 543 companies by market capitalization in the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Nanobiotix S A accounted for 2.7% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.38M compares with $0.77M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NBTX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
With a net margin of -73.52 %, Nanobiotix S A reported lower profitability than its competitors (-21.91 %).
Nanobiotix S A generated 2.74 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
API endpoints for this dataset
Nanobiotix S A vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Nanobiotix S A reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Nanobiotix S A and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Nanobiotix S A's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Nanobiotix S A's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | No | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (39) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | - | - | - | |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NBTX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NBTX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
NBTX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adlai Nortye Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Enliven Therapeutics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | 89bio Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Kezar Life Sciences Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Nanobiotix S A's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Nanobiotix S A's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Nanobiotix S a
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Nanobiotix S a |
1,542.18 | 36.85 |
 Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc |
12,889.45 | 1,427.94 |
 Nuvalent Inc |
9,751.98 | 4.23 |
 Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc |
7,585.40 | 280.75 |
 Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc |
4,933.17 | - |
 Enliven Therapeutics Inc |
3,767.31 | - |
| SUBTOTAL | 60,396.26 | 4,814.75 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Nanobiotix S a .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Nanobiotix S a versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Nanobiotix S A's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Nanobiotix S A reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Janssen | Company report | 85% |
| Pyxis Oncology Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Janssen Pharmaceutica NV | Company report | 85% |
| Adc Therapeutics Sa | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Nanobiotix S A's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Nanobiotix S A's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | Single Reportable 100.00 % |
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | Single reportable segment 100.00 % |
| Hutchmed china Limited | Other Ventures segment 47.94 % |
| Supernus Pharmaceuticals inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Nanobiotix S A's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | 1,542 | 379,901 | -279,287 |
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | 12,889 | 1,560,590 | -169,905 |
| Nuvalent Inc | 9,752 | 18,566 | -1,974,009 |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | 7,585 | 678,135 | -476,599 |
| Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4,933 | - | -1,630,627 |
| Enliven Therapeutics Inc | 3,767 | - | -1,891,367 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 58,854 | 771,875 | -317,776 |
Nanobiotix S A's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Iovance Biotherapeutics inc | US 98.66 % |
| Hutchmed china Limited | CN 74.28 % |
| Xoma Royalty Corporation | CH 54.36 % |
| Adc Therapeutics Sa | United States 96.73 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Nanobiotix S A's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 490 companies in Nanobiotix S A's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Nanobiotix S A ranks #134 of 490 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.02 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 995, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eli Lilly And Company | 1,278,652 | 24.03 % |
| 2 | Johnson and Johnson | 691,817 | 13.00 % |
| 3 | Abbvie Inc | 521,524 | 9.80 % |
| 4 | Merck and Co Inc | 362,966 | 6.82 % |
| 5 | Novartis Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Abbott Laboratories | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Novo Nordisk A | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Pfizer Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Astrazeneca Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 134 | Nanobiotix S a | 1,185 | 0.02 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Nanobiotix S A's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-12.
Nanobiotix S A's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 129 | Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1,277 | 5.56 % |
| 130 | Opko Health Inc | 1,261 | 28.95 % |
| 131 | Nektar Therapeutics | 1,231 | -36.68 % |
| 132 | Rapport Therapeutics Inc | 1,227 | 2.59 % |
| 133 | Savara Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 134 | Nanobiotix S a | 1,185 | 50.88 % |
| 135 | Maravai Lifesciences Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 136 | Gh Research Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 137 | Compass Pathways Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 138 | Harrow Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 139 | Cryoport inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Nanobiotix S A's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-12. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Nanobiotix S A's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (447 companies). See the full Major Pharmaceutical Preparations industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 38.09 % (avg) | -38.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -33.19 % | industry median | -38.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -73.52 % | -6.73 % (avg) | -66.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.65 % | 7.49 % (avg) | -5.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Nanobiotix S A's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 500.00 % | -119.87 % | - |
| Operating Margin | -73.96 % | - | -33.19 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -29.36 % | -90.63 % | -10.56 % |
| P/E | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Nanobiotix S A's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Nanobiotix S A falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Nanobiotix S A's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 995 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.65 % vs industry average 7.49 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Nanobiotix S A's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Nanobiotix S A's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Nanobiotix S A falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Nanobiotix S A's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+296.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 38.4 points below the industry median.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Nanobiotix S A's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | 0.92 | 1.09 | - |
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.83 | 3.39 | 0.60 |
| Nuvalent Inc | 1.98 | 13.90 | - |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1.01 | 3.60 | 0.94 |
| Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc | 17.26 | 35.60 | - |
| Enliven Therapeutics Inc | 20.72 | 44.42 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nanobiotix S A's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q3 2026 | +50.1 % | - |
| Nuvalent Inc | Q1 2026 | - | - |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q3 2026 | +79.6 % | - |
| Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Enliven Therapeutics Inc | Q3 2026 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +66.5 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nanobiotix S A's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | Q4 2025 | +82.4 % | -33.5 % |
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q3 2026 | - | +1.8 % |
| Nuvalent Inc | Q1 2026 | - | - |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q3 2026 | +121.2 % | -98.8 % |
| Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc | Q4 2025 | - | - |
| Enliven Therapeutics Inc | Q3 2026 | - | - |
Nanobiotix S A's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | - | - | - |
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | - | - |
| Nuvalent Inc | - | - | - |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | - | - |
| Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | - | - |
| Enliven Therapeutics Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Nanobiotix S A's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S a | - | 41.85 |
| Madrigal Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | 9.03 |
| Nuvalent Inc | - | 2,303.80 |
| Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | 27.02 |
| Terns Pharmaceuticals Inc | - | - |
| Enliven Therapeutics Inc | - | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 12.54 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.