Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mid Penn Bancorp Inc (MPB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Mid Penn Bancorp Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 264M vs 756,288M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+14.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+9.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Mid Penn Bancorp Inc generated 44.7% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 25.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 28.8% net margin compares with 29.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Mid Penn Bancorp Inc ranks #84 of 216 companies by market capitalization in the Regional Banks industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Mid Penn Bancorp Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.36M compares with $0.48M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MPB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc reported revenue growth of 44.66 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 25.03 %.
With a net margin of 28.79 %, Mid Penn Bancorp Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (28.95 %).
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc generated 0.04 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.03 % a year earlier.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Mid Penn Bancorp Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Regional Banks industry grew revenue -15.0% year over year, combined, vs 44.7% for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc. Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.06%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (185) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MPB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MPB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Old Point Financial Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Optimumbank Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Community Ban corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Bank Of The James Financial Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | The Bank Of New York Mellon Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of Mid Penn depends principally upon the Bank’s ability to compete in its market area. The Bank actively competes with other financial services companies for deposit, loan, and trust business. Competitors include other commercial banks, credit unions, savings banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, securities brokerage firms, finance companies, mutual funds, and service alternatives via the Internet. Financial institutions compete primarily on the quality of services rendered, interest rates on loans and deposits, service charges, the convenience of banking facilities, location and hours of operation and, in the case of loans to larger commercial borrowers, relative lending limits.
Many competitors are significantly larger than the Bank and have significantly
greater financial resources, personnel and locations from which to conduct business.
In addition, the Bank is subject to banking regulations while certain competitors
may not be. There are relatively few barriers for companies wanting to enter
into the financial services industry.
Mid Penn has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions
by emphasizing customer service. Mid Penn’s customer service model is
based on convenient hours, efficient and friendly employees, local decision
making, and quality products. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB”),
which broke down many barriers between the banking, securities and insurance
industries, has significantly affected the competitive environment in which
Mid Penn operates.
The flow of cash into mutual funds, much of which is made through tax deferred
investment vehicles such as 401(k) plans, have, until recently, had been a popular
savings vehicle for investors. The recent economic turmoil has negatively impacted
the returns on many of these investments and impacted the manner in which investors
distribute their funds across investment alternatives. The safety of traditional
bank products has again become an attractive option during this period of market
volatility. Mid Penn’s ability to attract funds in the future will be
impacted by the public’s appetite for the safety of insured or local investments
versus the returns offered by alternative choices as part of their personal
investment mix.
Publicly Traded Peers of Mid Penn Bancorp Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 923.52 | 263.71 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 906,840.78 | 186,328.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609.27 | 121,098.00 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,473.80 | 83,940.00 |
| Citigroup inc | 233,259.84 | 88,262.00 |
| Capital one financial corp | 122,021.31 | 51,099.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,863,578.44 | 858,789.03 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
Sources: Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Mid Penn Bancorp Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Bradesco | Named by the company | 85% |
| Financial Institutions Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Citigroup inc | Markets 29.42 % |
| D r Horton Inc | HomeBuildingOps 94.14 % |
| First Citizens Bancshares Inc | Commercial Bank 46.42 % |
| Pultegroup Inc | Florida 26.99 % |
| Lennar Corp | Homebuilding West 34.85 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 924 | 356,366 | 92,082 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 906,841 | 584,995 | 200,752 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,609 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,474 | 351,213 | 95,100 |
| Citigroup inc | 233,260 | 390,540 | 72,049 |
| Capital one financial corp | 122,021 | 669,712 | 137,615 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,862,655 | 484,826 | 130,213 |
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Lionsgate Studios Corp | UNITED STATES 64.70 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 198 companies in Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Mid Penn Bancorp Inc ranks #84 of 198 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.12 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 523, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bank Of Nova Scotia | 114,825 | 15.01 % |
| 2 | Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft | 72,405 | 9.47 % |
| 3 | State Street Corp | 50,515 | 6.60 % |
| 4 | Fifth Third Bancorp | 47,236 | 6.18 % |
| 5 | Ita Unibanco Holding S a | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | M and t Bank Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Northern Trust Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Citizens Financial Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | First Citizens Bancshares Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Bank Bradesco | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 84 | Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 924 | 0.12 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79 | Cnb Financial Corp | 998 | 31.50 % |
| 80 | Horizon Bancorp Inc | 977 | 18.99 % |
| 81 | Trustco Bank Corp Ny | 962 | 42.37 % |
| 82 | Central Pacific Financial Corp | 949 | 19.77 % |
| 83 | Five Star Bancorp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 84 | Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 924 | 22.36 % |
| 85 | Southside Bancshares Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 86 | Farmers National Banc Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 87 | First Community Bankshares Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 88 | First Financial Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 89 | Third Coast Bancshares Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Regional Banks industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (130 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 64.14 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 72.49 % | 49.90 % (avg) | +22.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.41 % | 3.18 % (avg) | -0.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Regional Banks industry average (130 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.8x | 15.6x | -3.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.7x | 6.2x | -1.5x |
| P/B | 1.0x | 1.3x | -0.3x |
| Return on Equity | 8.02 % | industry aggregate | -2.86 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 3.20 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 10.43 % | 46.42 % | 29.39 % | 25.24 % | 24.77 % | -2.10 % | 8.53 % | 26.45 % |
| Operating Margin | 26.98 % | 20.23 % | 26.33 % | 30.75 % | 28.35 % | 27.30 % | 33.79 % | 32.22 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.43 % | 3.05 % | 3.77 % | 4.95 % | 4.06 % | 0.80 % | 1.00 % | 2.45 % |
| P/E | 19.6x | 17.3x | 13.2x | 7.4x | 10.5x | 10.0x | 10.3x | 11.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.01x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 12.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 523 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.41 % vs industry average 3.18 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+14.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.01x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 12.3% median pace.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 0.11 | 0.80 | 1.41 |
| Citigroup inc | 0.01 | 0.40 | 1.75 |
| Capital one financial corp | 0.03 | 1.03 | 0.39 |
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | Q2 2026 | +44.7 % | +355.5 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +44.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +21.6 % |
| Citigroup inc | Q1 2026 | +14.1 % | +44.6 % |
| Capital one financial corp | Q2 2026 | +1,392.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +23.6 % | +46.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | Q2 2026 | -76.7 % | -33.7 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | -6.4 % | - |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | -16.2 % | - |
| Citigroup inc | Q1 2026 | - | -6.7 % |
| Capital one financial corp | Q2 2026 | -73.8 % | -8.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 1.03% | 2.76% | 8.02% |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 1.35% | 3.71% | 17.50% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 1.05% | 2.94% | 12.48% |
| Citigroup inc | 0.61% | 0.63% | 7.62% |
| Capital one financial corp | 1.56% | 3.24% | 9.26% |
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Mid Penn Bancorp Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp Inc | 12.51 | 3.50 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 14.17 | 4.87 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 12.78 | 3.34 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 11.82 | 2.96 |
| Citigroup inc | 16.34 | 2.64 |
| Capital one financial corp | 11.69 | 2.39 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 12.42 | 3.33 |
Sign in to see all peers for Mid Penn Bancorp Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.