Greenhill And Co Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Greenhill And Co Inc (GHL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Greenhill And Co Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 248M vs 922,564M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-50.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-22.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Greenhill And Co Inc generated -62.2% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2023, vs 6.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -91.7% net margin compares with 23.8% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Greenhill And Co Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.31M compares with $0.65M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
GHL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2023
Greenhill And Co Inc reported revenue contraction of 62.18 % year on year in Q3 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 6.40 %.
With a net margin of -91.70 %, Greenhill And Co Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (23.80 %).
Greenhill And Co Inc generated 0.02 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.05 % a year earlier.
Greenhill And Co Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Greenhill And Co Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Greenhill And Co Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Investment Services industry grew revenue -2.0% year over year, combined, vs -62.2% for Greenhill And Co Inc. Greenhill And Co Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.03% to 0.01%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (52) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 71.40 % (5 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
GHL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
GHL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
GHL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Bank Of New York Mellon Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | S and t Bancorp Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Citigroup inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | United Bankshares Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Popular Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Greenhill And Co Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We operate in a highly competitive environment where there are no long-term
contracted sources of revenue. Each revenue-generating engagement is separately
awarded and negotiated. Our list of clients with whom there is an active engagement
changes continually. To develop new client relationships, and to develop new
engagements from historic client relationships, we maintain, on an ongoing basis,
business dialogues with a large number of clients and potential clients. We
have gained a significant number of new clients each year through our business
development initiatives, through recruiting additional senior investment banking
professionals who bring with them client relationships and expertise in certain
industry sectors or geographies and through referrals from members of boards
of directors, attorneys and other parties with whom we have relationships. At
the same time, we lose clients each year as a result of the sale or merger of
a client, a change in a client’s senior management team, competition from
other investment banks and other causes.
The financial services industry is intensely competitive, and we expect it to
remain so. Our competitors are global and regional integrated banking firms,
mid-sized full service financial firms, other independent financial services
firms and specialized financial advisory firms. We compete with some of our
competitors globally and with others on a regional, product, industry or niche
basis. We compete on the basis of a number of factors, including transaction
execution skills, our range of products and services, strength of relationships,
innovation, reputation and price.
The global and regional integrated banking firms offer a wider range of products,
from loans, deposit-taking and insurance to brokerage, hedging, foreign exchange,
asset management and corporate finance and securities underwriting services,
which may enhance their competitive position. They also have the ability to
support their investment banking operations with commercial banking, insurance
and other financial services revenues in an effort to gain market share, which
could result in pricing pressure in our business. In addition to our larger
and mid-sized full service competitors, we compete with a number of independent
investment banks, which offer independent advisory services on a model similar
to ours. A few of the independent banks with whom we compete are larger and
have greater general and industry specific coverage resources. Further, over
the past few years, there has been an increase in the number of newly formed
independent advisory firms. Since independent advisory firms require minimal
capital to operate, there are few obstacles to starting new firms.
We believe our primary competitors in securing mergers and acquisitions and
financing advisory engagements are large, diversified financial institutions
including Bank of America Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, Citigroup Inc., Credit
Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., JPMorgan Chase
& Co., Morgan Stanley, and UBS AG, as well as other publicly listed investment
banking firms such as Evercore Partners Inc., Jefferies Group, Inc., Lazard
Ltd., Moelis & Company and PJT Partners, and certain closely held boutique
firms. Advisory services in restructuring and bankruptcy situations tend to
be highly specialized, and we believe our primary competitors to be Evercore
Partners, Inc., Houlihan Lokey, Inc., Lazard Ltd., Moelis & Company, PJT
Partners, Rothschild Group and many closely held boutique firms. We believe
our primary competitors in our capital advisory business are Credit Suisse Group
AG, Evercore Partners, Inc., Lazard Ltd., Park Hill Group LLC (part of PJT Partners)
and UBS AG and many closely held boutique firms.
Publicly Traded Peers of Greenhill and Co Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | 282.04 | 247.62 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 911,205.38 | 186,328.00 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,281.04 | 121,098.00 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,758.40 | 68,350.00 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 278,809.71 | 52,259.00 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,842.75 | 83,940.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 3,011,501.34 | 948,494.91 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Greenhill and Co Inc .
Sources: Greenhill and Co Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Greenhill and Co Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Credit Suisse Group AG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Perella Weinberg Partners | Named by the company | 85% |
| Barclays Bank PLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Evercore Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Deutsche Bank AG | Named by the company | 85% |
| Citigroup Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Moelis and Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bank of America Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Greenhill And Co Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Citigroup inc | Markets 29.42 % |
| Schwab Charles Corp | Investor Services 78.17 % |
| First Citizens Bancshares Inc | Commercial Bank 46.42 % |
| Webster Financial Corporation | Commercial Banking 48.55 % |
| Stifel Financial Corp | Global Wealth Management 36.46 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
Greenhill And Co Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | 282 | 309,526 | -33,904 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 911,205 | 584,995 | 200,752 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 404,281 | 568,535 | 158,005 |
| Morgan Stanley | 303,758 | 823,494 | 245,422 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 278,810 | 1,102,511 | 442,468 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 248,843 | 351,213 | 95,100 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 3,011,219 | 647,132 | 154,920 |
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
Greenhill And Co Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Stifel Financial Corp | Americas 55.21 % |
| Houlihan Lokey Inc | United States 71.23 % |
| Stonex Group Inc | Middle East and Asia 90.47 % |
| Brc Group Holdings Inc | North America 93.52 % |
| Credit Suisse Ag | Switzerland 86.53 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Investment Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (78 companies). See the full Investment Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 117.43 % | 61.67 % (avg) | +55.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -15.65 % | industry median | -47.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -7.46 % | 19.52 % (avg) | -27.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.23 % | 2.93 % (avg) | -0.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Investment Services industry average (78 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Investment Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 23.9x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 12.8x | - |
| P/B | 5.0x | 3.0x | +2.0x |
| Return on Equity | -49.21 % | industry aggregate | -60.07 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -6.72 % | 8.46 % (avg) | -15.18 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -4.97 % | 28.28 % | -28.71 % | 47.16 % | -14.48 % | 3.54 % | 1.88 % | -18.61 % |
| Operating Margin | 39.41 % | 42.60 % | 28.29 % | -73.05 % | 21.04 % | 21.40 % | 26.14 % | -3.08 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 17.37 % | 22.85 % | 10.30 % | -43.33 % | 13.92 % | 12.88 % | 13.58 % | -1.38 % |
| P/E | 30.9x | 14.5x | - | 17.3x | 42.2x | 128.8x | 10.8x | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Greenhill And Co Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Greenhill And Co Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.23 % vs industry average 2.93 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Greenhill And Co Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Greenhill And Co Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Greenhill And Co Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Greenhill And Co Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 47.3 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 60.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-50.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-22.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | 3.23 | 7.59 | 4.92 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Morgan Stanley | 0.40 | 1.12 | 3.16 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 0.50 | 0.79 | 3.11 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 0.11 | 0.80 | 1.41 |
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | Q3 2023 | -62.2 % | - |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | +30.4 % | +44.0 % |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.0 % | +27.5 % |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | -30.6 % | +58.1 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -65.3 % | +78.0 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | +21.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.4 % | +20.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Greenhill And Co Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | Q3 2023 | - | -89.5 % |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | Q2 2026 | -6.4 % | - |
| Bank Of America Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Morgan Stanley | Q2 2026 | - | +7.3 % |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Q2 2026 | -73.4 % | +5.5 % |
| Wells Fargo and Company | Q2 2026 | -16.2 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
Greenhill And Co Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | - | - | - |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 1.35% | 3.71% | 17.50% |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 0.97% | 2.76% | 11.13% |
| Morgan Stanley | 1.35% | 1.95% | 17.85% |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 1.07% | 1.86% | 16.95% |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 1.05% | 2.94% | 12.48% |
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Greenhill And Co Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhill and Co Inc | - | 1.14 |
| Jpmorgan Chase and Co | 14.24 | 4.89 |
| Bank Of America Corporation | 12.77 | 3.34 |
| Morgan Stanley | 15.66 | 4.44 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 14.16 | 5.34 |
| Wells Fargo and Company | 11.83 | 2.96 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.27 | 3.18 |
Sign in to see all peers for Greenhill and Co Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
