Flowers Foods Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Flowers Foods Inc (FLO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Flowers Foods Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5,224M vs 143,298M combined for tracked competitors (3.5% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-8.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.0%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Flowers Foods Inc generated -4.0% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -3.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 3.4% net margin compares with -7.7% for the peer group.
- Scale: Flowers Foods Inc ranks #27 of 62 companies by market capitalization in the Food Processing industry, holding 0.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Flowers Foods Inc accounted for 3.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 3.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.51M compares with $0.47M for the peer group (1.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
FLO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Flowers Foods Inc reported revenue contraction of 4.02 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -3.73 %.
With a net margin of 3.41 %, Flowers Foods Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-7.68 %).
Flowers Foods Inc generated 3.19 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 3.20 % a year earlier.
Flowers Foods Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Flowers Foods Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Flowers Foods Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Food Processing industry grew revenue 12.8% year over year, combined, vs -4.0% for Flowers Foods Inc. Flowers Foods Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.08% to 0.92%, a loss of 0.16 percentage points.
Flowers Foods Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (14) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 42.90 % (3 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
FLO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
FLO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
FLO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
FLO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dupont De Nemours Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Seneca Foods Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | The J M Smucker Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Tyson Foods Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Mannatech Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Flowers Foods Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Flowers Foods Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The U.S. market for fresh and frozen bakery products is estimated at $35 billion
at retail. This category is intensely competitive and underwent significant
change in 2013. From a national standpoint, Flowers Foods is currently the number
two company in the U.S. fresh baking industry based on market share.
In January 2012, Hostess filed for bankruptcy. By November 2012, Hostess, which
had been in bankruptcy for six of the last nine years, ceased production and
announced it would liquidate. This event impacted the industry as Hostess sales
shifted to other producers to meet marketplace needs. These producers included
Flowers, BBU (with Sara Lee, Arnolds, Thomas, and Entenmann’s brands),
Campbell Soup Company (with the Pepperidge Farm brand), McKee Foods Corporation
(Little Debbie) and smaller regional bakeries, retailer-owned bakeries, and
store brands. The Hostess cake products were re-introduced into the market in
July 2013 by a new and separate company formed by Apollo Global Management and
C. Dean Metropoulous & Co.
The current competitive landscape for breads and rolls in the U.S. baking industry
now consists of BBU, Flowers Foods, and Campbell Soup Company on a national
or super-regional scale, together with independent regional bakers, local bakeries,
and retailer-owned bakeries. The company faces significant competition from
store brands (also known as “private label”) and products produced
by independent bakers. While store brand breads and rolls have been offered
by food retailers for decades, food retailers have put more emphasis on store
brand products with the entry of mass merchandisers like Walmart and the ongoing
consolidation of traditional supermarkets into much larger regional operations.
In general, the store brand share of retail fresh packaged bread accounts for
approximately 26% of the dollar sales and approximately 39% of unit sales and
has remained stable for the past five years.
There are a number of smaller regional bakers in the U.S. Some of these do not
enjoy the competitive advantages of larger operations, including greater brand
awareness and economies of scale in purchasing, distribution, production, information
technology, advertising and marketing. However, size alone is not sufficient
to ensure success in our industry.
Competition in the baking industry continues to be driven by a number of factors.
These include the ability to serve consolidated retail and foodservice customers,
generational changes in family-owned businesses, and competitors’ promotional
efforts on branded bread and store brands. Competition typically is based on
product availability, product quality, brand loyalty, price, effective promotions,
and the ability to target changing consumer preferences. Customer service, including
frequent delivery to keep store shelves well-stocked, is an increasingly important
competitive factor.
Competition for fresh packaged bakery snack products is based upon the ability
to meet production and distribution demands of retail and vending customers
at a competitive price. Primary national competitors for fresh packaged bakery
snack products include Hostess cake products, McKee Foods Corporation (Little
Debbie and Drake’s), ARYZTA (Cloverhill Bakery), and BBU.
Competitors for frozen bakery products include Alpha Baking Co., Inc., Rotella’s
Italian Bakery, Highland Baking Company, United States Bakery, Turano Baking
Company, and All Round Foods, Inc. Competition for frozen bakery products is
based primarily on product quality and consistency, product variety and the
ability to consistently meet production and distribution demands at a competitive
price.
The company also faces competition from store brands that are produced both
by us and our competitors. For several decades, store brand breads and rolls
have been offered by food retail customers. Recently, food retailers have put
more emphasis on store brand products, initiating a store brand push in such
categories as chips and cereals. In general, the store brand share of the fresh
bread aisle has remained relatively consistent.
Publicly Traded Peers of Flowers Foods Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | 1,200.59 | 5,223.93 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087.25 | 55,694.00 |
| General Mills Inc | 18,073.44 | 18,296.60 |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | 17,918.06 | 4,701.00 |
| The J M Smucker Company | 12,886.08 | 9,157.10 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 11,004.95 | 12,147.26 |
| SUBTOTAL | 99,498.41 | 148,663.05 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Flowers Foods Inc.
Sources: Flowers Foods Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Flowers Foods Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Flowers Foods Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Hostess Brands inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Turano Baking Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Alpha Baking Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Campbell Soup Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Highland Baking Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| McKee Foods Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Flowers Foods Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Flowers Foods Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Tyson Foods Inc | Beef 37.15 % |
| General Mills Inc | United States Meals and Baking Solutions Operating Unit 24.61 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | Diversified Industrials 52.94 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | U.S. Retail Coffee 38.83 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Retail 60.21 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Flowers Foods Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | 1,201 | 507,177 | 5,357 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087 | 418,752 | 4,496 |
| General Mills Inc | 18,073 | 609,887 | -29,703 |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | 17,918 | 313,400 | 5,600 |
| The J M Smucker Company | 12,886 | 1,308,157 | 32,786 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 11,005 | 607,363 | 17,123 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 98,298 | 472,481 | -2,798 |
Flowers Foods Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | United States 44.47 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | United States 94.68 % |
| Pilgrim s Pride Corporation | United States 55.93 % |
| J and j Snack Foods Corp | US 95.74 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Flowers Foods Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 53 companies in Flowers Foods Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Flowers Foods Inc ranks #27 of 53 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.39 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,027, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mondel z International Inc | 77,391 | 25.34 % |
| 2 | Hershey Co | 33,585 | 11.00 % |
| 3 | Kraft Heinz Co | 27,942 | 9.15 % |
| 4 | Tyson Foods Inc | 18,087 | 5.92 % |
| 5 | General Mills Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Magnum Ice Cream Co N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | The J M Smucker Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hormel Foods Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Smithfield Foods Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 27 | Flowers Foods Inc | 1,201 | 0.39 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Flowers Foods Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Flowers Foods Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | The Marzetti Company | 2,771 | -42.07 % |
| 23 | Nomad Foods Limited | 1,597 | -17.97 % |
| 24 | J and j Snack Foods Corp | 1,458 | -19.14 % |
| 25 | Utz Brands Inc | 1,261 | 18.02 % |
| 26 | Seneca Foods Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 27 | Flowers Foods Inc | 1,201 | -55.88 % |
| 28 | Bellring Brands Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 29 | The Simply Good Foods Company | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 30 | Steakholder Foods Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 31 | Sanfilippo John B and Son Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 32 | Once Upon A Farm Pbc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Flowers Foods Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Flowers Foods Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Food Processing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (79 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.63 % | 26.42 % (avg) | +22.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 2.74 % | industry median | -2.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 3.92 % | -1.80 % (avg) | +5.7 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.21 % | 4.50 % (avg) | -2.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Flowers Foods Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Food Processing industry average (79 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 29.8x | 26.5x | +3.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.0x | 12.9x | +4.1x |
| P/B | 1.3x | 2.9x | -1.7x |
| Return on Equity | 4.13 % | industry aggregate | 2.15 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.07 % | 0.69 % (avg) | 2.38 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Flowers Foods Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 2.10 % | 4.36 % | 6.40 % | -1.30 % | 10.97 % | 5.93 % | 0.25 % | 3.00 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.37 % | 5.47 % | 7.33 % | 6.81 % | 6.31 % | 3.40 % | 6.82 % | 3.31 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.87 % | 5.50 % | 6.59 % | 6.40 % | 6.91 % | 4.08 % | 8.30 % | 3.57 % |
| P/E | 26.0x | 28.0x | 31.8x | 27.9x | 26.7x | 38.2x | 17.9x | 27.2x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Flowers Foods Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Flowers Foods Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Flowers Foods Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Flowers Foods Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Flowers Foods Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Flowers Foods Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 1.7% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Flowers Foods Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,027 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.21 % vs industry average 4.50 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Flowers Foods Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Flowers Foods Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Flowers Foods Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Flowers Foods Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Flowers Foods Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-8.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (41.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Flowers Foods Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | 0.02 | 0.77 | 1.37 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 0.15 | 1.58 | 0.57 |
| General Mills Inc | 0.07 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | 0.62 | 2.29 | 0.28 |
| The J M Smucker Company | - | 0.83 | 1.24 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 0.47 | 2.15 | 0.45 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Flowers Foods Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.0 % | -30.3 % |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.1 % | +169.6 % |
| General Mills Inc | Q3 2026 | -2.8 % | -67.0 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | Q2 2026 | -44.2 % | +110.0 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | Q2 2026 | +5.0 % | - |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.3 % | -67.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -4.2 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Flowers Foods Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | -3.3 % | -22.6 % |
| Tyson Foods Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.6 % | -30.0 % |
| General Mills Inc | Q3 2026 | -2.8 % | -17.4 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | Q2 2026 | +3.2 % | +52.0 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | Q2 2026 | -24.3 % | +4.9 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.2 % | -5.6 % |
Flowers Foods Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | 1.31% | 1.65% | 4.13% |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 1.66% | 1.98% | 3.28% |
| General Mills Inc | - | - | - |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.51% |
| The J M Smucker Company | 1.36% | 1.58% | 3.92% |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 2.56% | 2.95% | 4.33% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Flowers Foods Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods Inc | 21.39 | 0.23 |
| Tyson Foods Inc | 31.43 | 0.32 |
| General Mills Inc | - | 0.99 |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | 291.07 | 3.81 |
| The J M Smucker Company | 56.21 | 1.41 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 31.78 | 0.91 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.67 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.