Edible Garden Ag Incorporated's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Edible Garden Ag Incorporated (EDBL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Edible Garden Ag Incorporated vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 14M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Edible Garden Ag Incorporated ranks #36 of 45 companies by market capitalization in the Agricultural Production industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Edible Garden Ag Incorporated accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
EDBL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Edible Garden Ag Incorporated generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 16.8% year over year, combined, vs 12.8% for Edible Garden Ag Incorporated. Edible Garden Ag Incorporated's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Edible Garden Ag Incorporated's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edible Garden Ag Incorporated | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
EDBL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
EDBL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
EDBL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
EDBL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Edible Garden Ag Incorporated's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Edible Garden Ag Incorporated's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Post Consumer Brands | Named by the company | 85% |
| 80 Acres Farms | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gehl Food & Beverage | Named by the company | 85% |
| Niagara Bottling | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wakefern Food Corporation/ShopRite | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bright Farms | Named by the company | 85% |
| King Kullen | Named by the company | 85% |
| Target | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aero Farms | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gotham Greens | Named by the company | 85% |
| Plenty | Named by the company | 85% |
| Walmart | Named by the company | 85% |
| D’Agostino’s | Named by the company | 85% |
| Meijer | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tops | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bowery Farms | Named by the company | 85% |
| H-Mart | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Edible Garden Ag Incorporated's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.