Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc (ASNA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,994M vs 2,793M combined for tracked competitors (51.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-23.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+7.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc generated -46.0% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2020, vs 48.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 13.3% net margin compares with 5.4% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc accounted for 43.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 67.7% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ASNA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2020
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc reported revenue contraction of 45.97 % year on year in Q1 2020, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 48.53 %.
With a net margin of 13.32 %, Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (5.39 %).
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc generated 43.30 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 67.73 % a year earlier.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2020
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Retail Apparel industry grew revenue 3.1% year over year, combined, vs -46.0% for Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc. Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.33% to 1.22%, a loss of 1.11 percentage points.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 85.70 % (6 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ASNA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ASNA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vince Holding Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Tilly s Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Torrid Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Zumiez Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | 6.12 | 2,994.00 |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | 238.91 | 979.38 |
| Zumiez Inc | 229.14 | 937.47 |
| Vince Holding Corp | 139.00 | 305.59 |
| Tilly s Inc | 134.63 | 570.57 |
| SUBTOTAL | 747.80 | 5,787.01 |
Sources: Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | Premium Fashion 53.49 % |
| Vince Holding Corp | Vince Wholesale 55.27 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | 6 | - | - |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | 239 | 172,274 | -2,209 |
| Zumiez Inc | 229 | 104,164 | 1,605 |
| Vince Holding Corp | 139 | 547,647 | 16,272 |
| Tilly s Inc | 135 | 111,375 | -635 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 742 | 137,141 | 379 |
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Zumiez Inc | US 76.22 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Retail Apparel industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (41 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.44 % | 37.51 % (avg) | +7.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | -44.43 % | industry median | -40.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -30.92 % | 6.11 % (avg) | -37.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.13 % | 2.45 % (avg) | -1.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Retail Apparel industry average (41 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 17.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 9.5x | - |
| P/B | 0.0x | 3.0x | -3.0x |
| Return on Equity | 182.44 % | industry aggregate | 192.38 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -135.40 % | 1.57 % (avg) | -136.97 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | 17.48 % | 18.58 % | 22.48 % | -4.74 % | 0.37 % | -39.72 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.39 % | 2.82 % | -5.18 % | 1.58 % | -16.86 % | 0.22 % | -16.27 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.71 % | 3.88 % | -6.56 % | 2.03 % | -34.76 % | 0.49 % | -31.64 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | 148.4x | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.13 % vs industry average 2.45 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 192.4 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 40.7 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-23.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Losing revenue share to the broader industry (-1.1 points over the past year).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | 0.39 | 0.91 | - |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | 0.08 | 0.80 | - |
| Zumiez Inc | 0.53 | 1.88 | - |
| Vince Holding Corp | 0.01 | 1.65 | 0.58 |
| Tilly s Inc | 0.36 | 1.17 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | Q3 2020 | -46.0 % | +140.7 % |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | Q1 2026 | -7.8 % | -93.0 % |
| Zumiez Inc | Q1 2026 | +4.9 % | - |
| Vince Holding Corp | Q1 2026 | +10.5 % | - |
| Tilly s Inc | Q1 2026 | +15.9 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -28.4 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | Q3 2020 | -26.1 % | -90.1 % |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | Q1 2026 | -3.7 % | +115.3 % |
| Zumiez Inc | Q1 2026 | +2.3 % | -23.1 % |
| Vince Holding Corp | Q1 2026 | +10.0 % | -84.8 % |
| Tilly s Inc | Q1 2026 | +2.7 % | -8.7 % |
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | - | - | - |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
| Zumiez Inc | 2.29% | 2.16% | 4.73% |
| Vince Holding Corp | 3.91% | 4.81% | 18.07% |
| Tilly s Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Mahwah Bergen Retail Group Inc | - | 0.00 |
| Torrid Holdings Inc | - | 0.24 |
| Zumiez Inc | 17.68 | 0.24 |
| Vince Holding Corp | 0.02 | 0.45 |
| Tilly s Inc | - | 0.24 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.13 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.