Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc (TYPE) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 246M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TYPE Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2019
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 1.3% year over year, combined, vs 4.1% for Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc. Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.04% to 0.05%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 85.70 % (6 of 7) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 33.30 % (2 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.