Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc (TLCC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 11M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-39.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc ranks #24 of 37 companies by market capitalization in the Legal Cannabis industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TLCC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Legal Cannabis industry grew revenue 35.0% year over year, combined, vs -50.7% for Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc. Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.14% to 0.05%, a loss of 0.09 percentage points.
Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (3 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TLCC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TLCC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TLCC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TLCC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Nature's Way | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sprouts Farmers Market | Named by the company | 85% |
| Country Life | Named by the company | 85% |
| Natural Grocers | Named by the company | 85% |
| Now Foods | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jarrow Formulas | Named by the company | 85% |
| New Chapter | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Vitamin Shoppe | Named by the company | 85% |
| Enzymatic Therapy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nature's Plus | Named by the company | 85% |
| Solgar | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bluebonnet | Named by the company | 85% |
| Natural Factors | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nordic Naturals | Named by the company | 85% |
| Whole Foods Market | Named by the company | 85% |
| Garden of Life | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Twinlab Consolidated Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.