Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Swk Holdings's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Swk Holdings (SWKH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
18
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.01 %
vs 0.02 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-29.70 %
Peers: 42.96 %
Net Margin
-223.08 %
Peers: 10.63 %

Key Findings: Swk Holdings vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 41M vs 280,747M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-16.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+4.3%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Swk Holdings generated -29.7% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 43.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its -223.1% net margin compares with 10.6% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Swk Holdings accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $4.61M compares with $3.77M for the peer group (1.2x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SWKH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Swk Holdings reported revenue contraction of 29.70 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 42.96 %.

With a net margin of -223.08 %, Swk Holdings reported lower profitability than its competitors (10.63 %).

Swk Holdings generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.02 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SWKH/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SWKH/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SWKH/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Swk Holdings vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Revenue growth, year on year

Swk Holdings -29.7 %
Competitors combined +43.0 %

Net margin

Swk Holdings -223.1 %
Competitors combined +10.6 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Swk Holdings -16.1 %
Competitors combined +4.3 %

TTM net margin

Swk Holdings -6.1 %
Competitors combined +9.7 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Swk Holdings and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Swk Holdings Corporation $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Swk Holdings's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs -29.7% for Swk Holdings. Swk Holdings's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Swk Holdings's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Swk Holdings Corporation No No No No
Competitors combined (18) 100% 80% 73% 38%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

0%market share
  • Swk Holdings0.0%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Swk Holdings and its 18 tracked competitors.

See Swk Holdings's full market share breakdown »

SWKH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SWKH Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Swk Holdings's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
13.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(2 of 15)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Swk Holdings Corporation -9.70 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (15) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Swk Holdings's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SWKH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SWKH Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Wisdomtree Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Voya Financial Inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 U S Global Investors Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Westwood Holdings Group Inc 282.9% Outperformed
5 Stonex Group Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Swk Holdings's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Swk Holdings's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Our markets are very competitive. We face competition in the pursuit of outside investors, investment management clients and opportunities to deploy our capital in attractive healthcare related companies. Our primary competitors provide financing to prospective companies and include non-bank financial institutions, federal or state chartered banks, venture debt funds, venture capital funds, private equity funds, pharmaceutical royalty and other investment funds, business development companies and investment banks. Many of these entities have greater financial and managerial resources than we have. Some of these competitors may also have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not available to us, which may create a competitive disadvantage for us. As a result, we tend not to compete on price, but instead focus on our industry experience, flexible financing options and speed to evaluate and complete a transaction. In addition, since many of our competitors that provide longer term, royalty-related financing options have much greater financial resources than us, they tend not to focus on transaction sizes below $50 million as it is generally inefficient for them to do so.

Publicly Traded Peers of Swk Holdings Corporation

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Swk Holdings Corporation 193.38 41.46 -2.53 9
Blackrock Inc 176,378.92 27,626.00 7,130.00 24,900
Blackstone Inc 91,612.25 16,110.48 6,825.69 5,285
Apollo Global Management Inc 72,616.39 35,899.00 4,299.00 6,140
Carlyle Group Inc 14,515.76 3,611.30 540.90 2,500
Evercore Inc 10,761.48 4,741.99 809.20 2,570
SUBTOTAL 399,137.48 282,135.24 27,249.91 74,816
13 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Swk Holdings Corporation.

Sources: Swk Holdings Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Swk Holdings Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Swk Holdings's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Aptar Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Swk Holdings's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Swk Holdings's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Swk Holdings Corporation Pharmaceutical Development, 5.19 % - -
Apollo Global Management Inc Retirement Services 36.50 % Asset Management 12.04 % Principal Investing 1.41 %
Carlyle Group Inc Global Private Equity 50.44 % Global Credit 32.35 % Carlyle AlpInvest 16.21 %
Evercore Inc Investment Banking and Equities 97.29 % Investment Management 1.62 % -
Stonex Group Inc Commercial 97.75 % Institutional 1.90 % Self-Directed/Retail 0.23 %
Lazard Inc Financial Advisory 60.86 % Asset Management 35.79 % Corporate 0.63 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

5 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

Swk Holdings's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Swk Holdings Corporation 193 4,606,333 -281,444
Blackrock Inc 176,379 1,109,478 286,345
Blackstone Inc 91,612 3,048,341 1,291,521
Apollo Global Management Inc 72,616 5,846,743 700,163
Carlyle Group Inc 14,516 1,444,520 216,360
Evercore Inc 10,761 1,845,132 314,863
PEERS TOTAL 398,944 3,770,954 364,303
13 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

Swk Holdings's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Blackrock Inc Americas 64.41 % Europe 28.86 % Asia Pacific 5.41 %
Stonex Group Inc Middle East and Asia 90.47 % United States 6.01 % Europe 3.10 %
U s Silica Holdings Inc Non-US 5.82 % - -
Westwood Holdings Group Inc United States 99.40 % Canada 0.60 % -

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Swk Holdings's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 155 companies in Swk Holdings's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Swk Holdings ranks #0 of 155 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,026, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Visa Inc 704,590 22.57 %
2 Mastercard Incorporated 501,774 16.07 %
3 Repay Holdings Corporation 312,320 10.00 %
4 Alibaba Group Holding Limited 252,525 8.09 %
5 Uber Technologies Inc 1,234 5.2%
6 Accenture Plc 1,234 5.2%
7 Pdd Holdings inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Orix Corporation 1,234 5.2%
9 Mercadolibre Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Uxin Limited 1,234 5.2%
0 Swk Holdings Corporation 193 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Swk Holdings's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-04-15.

Swk Holdings's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Professional Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (230 companies).
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 97.77 % 47.17 % (avg) +50.6 pp
Operating Margin 48.91 % industry median +47.0 pp
EBITDA Margin 71.17 % 5.74 % (avg) +65.4 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) - 4.25 % (avg) -

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Swk Holdings's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Professional Services industry average (230 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 25.6x -
EV / EBITDA 7.1x 15.4x -8.3x
P/B 0.8x 3.7x -2.9x
Return on Equity -0.99 % industry aggregate -19.61 %
Return on Invested Capital 3.70 % 5.25 % (avg) -1.55 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Swk Holdings's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20182019202020212022202320242025
Revenue Growth -30.67 %18.30 %19.40 %52.96 %-26.13 %-8.98 %19.14 %-7.85 %
Operating Margin 1.10 %48.71 %14.28 %55.94 %24.85 %43.69 %25.75 %48.91 %
Return on Invested Capital 0.07 %3.25 %1.08 %5.95 %1.84 %2.87 %1.92 %3.70 %
P/E 20.3x6.9x34.4x9.5x18.2x13.6x15.0x-

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Swk Holdings's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Swk Holdings's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Swk Holdings is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)VOYASwk HoldingsRELXFISVCASSGSKYHQICDKPDM

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Swk Holdings's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 1,026 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Swk Holdings's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Swk Holdings's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Swk Holdings's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest Swk Holdings
Harvest / Divest

Swk Holdings falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Swk Holdings's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 47.0 points above the industry median.

Weaknesses

  • Return on equity 19.6 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-16.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.

Opportunities

  • A meaningful share of tracked competitors (37.50 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Swk Holdings's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Swk Holdings Corporation 4.27 7.54 0.09 0.14
Blackrock Inc 7.72 7.87 0.23 0.16
Blackstone Inc 1.26 4.17 0.63 0.33
Apollo Global Management Inc - - 0.33 0.08
Carlyle Group Inc 4.53 5.37 0.42 0.13
Evercore Inc 0.94 2.54 0.26 1.01
13 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Swk Holdings's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Swk Holdings CorporationQ4 2025-22.7 %-20.1 %--
Blackrock Inc Q2 2026+27.2 %+4.4 %+22.6 %-12.2 %
Blackstone Inc Q2 2026+35.9 %+39.4 %+44.9 %+87.3 %
Apollo Global Management Inc Q2 2026+63.7 %+120.5 %+148.1 %-
Carlyle Group Inc Q2 2026-28.6 %+342.3 %-31.5 %-
Evercore Inc Q2 2026+19.1 %-28.7 %-0.4 %-67.0 %
PEERS TOTAL+20.6 %+5.3 %+30.5 %+162.4 %
13 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Swk Holdings's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Swk Holdings CorporationQ4 2025-52.9 %---
Blackrock Inc Q2 2026--+22.5 %+2.8 %
Blackstone Inc Q2 2026---20.4 %-4.3 %
Apollo Global Management Inc Q2 2026----
Carlyle Group Inc Q2 2026--+82.9 %+13.9 %
Evercore Inc Q2 2026+97.1 %-6.7 %-58.8 %+245.8 %
13 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

Swk Holdings's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Swk Holdings Corporation---8.41-
Blackrock Inc 4.20%4.33%12.59%5.36-
Blackstone Inc 14.18%13.64%33.51%30.69-
Apollo Global Management Inc 0.92%1.23%10.53%--
Carlyle Group Inc 1.89%1.36%7.59%--
Evercore Inc 17.22%21.62%37.32%8.64-
13 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Swk Holdings's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Swk Holdings Corporation-4.66-5.250.82
Blackrock Inc 25.976.38-173.093.05
Blackstone Inc 25.625.690.74409.254.35
Apollo Global Management Inc 42.962.02-5.401.75
Carlyle Group Inc 11.574.020.73-2.01
Evercore Inc 14.722.270.2116.824.94
PEERS AVERAGE14.651.4117.511.79
13 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Swk Holdings Corporation.

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.